Advertisement

Living rivers: trends and challenges in science and management

  • G. van der Velde
  • R. S. E. W. Leuven
  • A. M. J. Ragas
  • A. J. M. Smits
Chapter
  • 846 Downloads
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 187)

Abstract

This paper discusses and summarizes the major conclusions of the special issue entitled ‘Living rivers: trends and challenges in science and management’ of Hydrobiologia/Developments in Hydrobiology. It is structured along three lines: (1) Functioning of river systems; (2) Ecological rehabilitation of river systems; (3) Challenges and obstacles to sustainable management. Sustainable river basin management requires a thorough understanding of natural, physical, chemical and ecological processes as well as socio-economic functioning. Environmental rehabilitation of river systems inevitably requires an ecosystem-based approach involving solutions supported by the public. The challenge is to combine ecological and socioeconomic sustainability. Rethinking our efforts in both directions must lead to more innovative solutions than those available at present.

Key words

environmental rehabilitation ecological rehabilitation ecosystem-based water management river functioning sustainability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Admiraal, W., G. van der Velde, H. Smit & W. G. Cazemier, 1993. The rivers Rhine and Meuse in the Netherlands: present state and signs of ecological recovery. Hydrobiologia 265: 97–128.Google Scholar
  2. Ahn, C., D. M. Johnston, R. E. Sparks & D. C. White, 2006. Analysis of naturalization alternatives for the recovery of moist-soil plants in the floodplain of the Illinois River. Hydrobiologia 565: 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anonymous, 2003. Freude am Fluss project, Interreg IIIB North-West Europe, Application Form Radboud University Nijmegen. Interreg IIIB NWE Secretariat ENO, Lille.Google Scholar
  4. Baptist, M. J., M. Haasnoot, P. Cornelissen, J. Icke, G. van der Wedden, H. J. de Vriend & G. Gugić, 2006. Flood detention, nature development and water quality along the lowland river Sava, Croatia. Hydrobiologia 565: 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bij de Vaate, A., R. Breukel & G. van der Velde, 2006. Longterm developments in ecological rehabilitation of the main distributaries in the Rhine delta: fish and macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 565: 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bohannon, J. & M. Enserink, 2005. Hurricane Katrina. Scientists weigh options for rebuilding New Orleans. Science 309: 1808–1809.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brouwer, G., 2003. The creeping storm. Civil Engineering-ASCE 73: 46–55.Google Scholar
  8. Brundtland Commission, 1987. Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development of the United Nations. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Buijse, A., F. Klijn, R. S. E. W. Leuven, H. Middelkoop, F. Schiemer, J. Thorp & H. Wolfert, 2005. Rehabilitation of large rivers: references, achievements and integration into river management. Archiv fü r Hydrobiologie Supplement 155(1-4) Large Rivers 15(1-4): 715–738.Google Scholar
  10. De Groot, W. T. & H. J. R. Lenders, 2006. Emergent principles for river management. Hydrobiologia 565: 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Nooij, R. J. W., W. C. E. P. Verberk, H. J. R. Lenders, R. S. E. W. Leuven & P. H. Nienhuis, 2006. The importance of hydrodynamics for protected and endangered biodiversity of lowland rivers. Hydrobiologia 565: 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischetti, M., 2001. Drowing New Orleans. Scientific American 285: 76–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geerling, G. W., A. M. J. Ragas, R. S. E. W. Leuven, J. H. van den Berg, M. Breedveld, D. Liefhebber & A. J. M. Smits, 2006. Succession and rejuvenation in floodplains along the River Allier (France). Hydrobiologia 565: 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hollander, A., M. A. J. Huijbregts, A. M. J. Ragas & D. van de Meent, 2006. BasinBox: a generic multimedia fate model for the predicting of the fate of chemicals in river catchments. Hydrobiologia 565: 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnston, C. A. & R. J. Naiman, 1990. Browse selection by beaver: effects on riparian forest composition. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 1036–1043.Google Scholar
  16. Knip, K. 2005. Overstroming New Orleans was zoals voorspeld. NRC Handelsblad 7 September 2005 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  17. Lamers, L. P. M., R. Loeb, A. M. Antheunissen, M. Miletto, E. C. H. E. T. Lucassen, A. W. Boxman, A. J. P. Smolders & J. G. M. Roelofs, 2006. Biogeochemical constraints on the ecological rehabilitation of wetland vegetation in river floodplains. Hydrobiologia 565: 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lenders, H. J. R. & L. Knippenberg, 2005. The temporal and social dimensions of river rehabilitation: towards a multi-dimensional research perspective. Archiv fü r Hydrobiologie Supplement 155 (1-4) Large Rivers 15 (1-4): 119–131.Google Scholar
  19. Leuven, R. S. E. W., A. J. M. Smits & P. H. Nienhuis, 2000. From integrated approaches to sustainable river basin management. In Smits, A. J. M., P. H. Nienhuis, & R. S. E. W. Leuven (eds), New Approaches to River Management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 329–347.Google Scholar
  20. Leuven, R. S. E. W., P. J. M. van den Heuvel, M. M. van Katwijk, P. M. J. Herman, G. van der Velde & A. M. J. Ragas, 2006a. Pieter Hendrik Nienhuis: aquatic ecologist and environmental scientist. Hydrobiologia 565: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leuven, R. S. E. W., A. M. J. Ragas, A. J. M. Smits & G. van der Velde (eds), 2006b. Living rivers: trends and challenges in science and management. Hydrobiologia 565: 1–367.Google Scholar
  22. Nienhuis, P. H., R. S. E. W. Leuven & A. M. J. Ragas (eds), 1998. New Concepts for Sustainable Management of River Basins. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.Google Scholar
  23. Nienhuis, P. H. & R. S. E. W. Leuven, 1998. Ecological concepts for the sustainable management of lowland river basins: a review. In Nienhuis, P. H., R. S. E. W. Leuven & A. M. J. Ragas (eds), New Concepts for Sustainable Management of River Basins. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 7–34.Google Scholar
  24. Nienhuis, P. H., A. D. Buijse, R. S. E. W. Leuven, A. J. M. Smits, R. J. W. de Nooij & E. M. Samborska, 2002. Ecological rehabilitation of the lowland basin of the river Rhine (NW Europe). Hydrobiologia 478: 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nienhuis, P. H., 2006. Water and values: Ecological research as the basis for water management and nature management. Hydrobiologia 565: 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peters, B., E. Kater & G. W. Geerling, 2005. Handboek Cyclisch Beheer-Omgaan met Spontane Natuur en Hydraulische Opstuwing. Staatsbosbeheer, Rijkswaterstaat, Stichting Ark & Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  27. Petts, G.E., J. Nestler & R. Kennedy, 2006. Advancing science for water resources management. Hydrobiologia 565: 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pollux, B. J. A., A. Korosi, W. C. E. P. Verberk, P. M. J. Pollux & G. van der Velde, 2006. Reproduction, growth and migration of fishes in a regulated lowland tributary: Potential recruitment to the river Meuse. Hydrobiologia 565: 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryder, D. & A. J. Boulton, 2005. Redressing the limnological imbalance: trends in aquatic ecology, management and conservation in Australia. Hydrobiologia 552: 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smits, A. J. M., P. H. Nienhuis & R. S. E. W. Leuven (eds), 2000. New Approaches to River Management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.Google Scholar
  31. Smits, A. J. M., P. H. Nienhuis & H. L. F. Saeijs, 2006. Changing estuaries, changing views. Hydrobiologia 565: 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Straatsma, M. W. & H. Middelkoop, 2006. Airborne laser scanning as a tool for lowland floodplain vegetation monitoring. Hydrobiologia 565: 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tockner, K., I. Klaus, C. Baumgartner & J. V. Ward, 2006. Amphibian diversity and nestedness in a dynamic floodplain river (Tagliamento, NE-Italy). Hydrobiologia 565: 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van der Velde, G., I. Nagelkerken, S. Rajagopal & A. bij de Vaate, 2002. Invasions by alien species in inland freshwater bodies in western Europe: the Rhine delta. In Leppä koski, E., S. Gollasch, & S. Olenin (eds), Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe. Distribution, Impacts and Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 360–372.Google Scholar
  35. Van der Velde, G., R. S. E. W. Leuven & I. Nagelkerken, 2004. Types of river ecosystems. In: Fresh surface water. Water Sciences, Engineering and Technology Resources. Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS). UNESCO, EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, 1–29 (http://www.eolss.net/).Google Scholar
  36. Van Duinen, G. A., Y. Zhuge, W. C. E. P. Verberk, A. M. T. Brock, H. H. van Kleef, R. S. E. W. Leuven, G. van der Velde & H. Esselink, 2006. Effects of rewetting measures in Dutch raised bog remnants on assemblages of aquatic Rotifera and microcrustaceans. Hydrobiologia 565: 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Eck, W. H. J. M., J. P. M. Lenssen, H. M. van de Steeg, C. W. P. M. Blom & H. de Kroon, 2006. Seasonal dependent effects of flooding on plant species survival and zonation: a comparative study of ten grassland species. Hydrobiologia 565: 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Kleef, H. H., W. C. E. P. Verberk, R. S. E. W. Leuven, H. Esselink, G. van der Velde & G. A. van Duinen, 2006. Biological traits successfully predict the effects of restoration management on macroinvertebrates in shallow softwater lakes. Hydrobiologia 565: 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Riel, M. C., G. van der Velde, S. Rajagopal, S. Marguillier, F. Dehairs & A. de bij Vaate, 2006. Trophic relationships in the lower Rhine food web during invasion and after establishment of the Ponto-Caspian invader Dikerogammarus villosus. Hydrobiologia 565: 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Stokkom, H. T. C., A. J. M. Smits & R. S. E. W. Leuven, 2005. Flood defense in the Netherlands: a new era, a new approach. Water International 30: 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vugteveen, P., R. S. E. W. Leuven, M. A. J. Huijbregts & H. J. R. Lenders, 2006. Redefinition and elaboration of river ecosystem health: perspective for river management. Hydrobiologia 565: 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wetzel, A. G., 2001. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems (3rd edn.). Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  43. Wiering, M. A. & B. J. M. Arts, 2006. Discursive shifts in Dutch river management: ‘deep’ institutional change or adaptation strategy? Hydrobiologia 565: 327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wijnhoven, S., G. van der Velde, R. S. E. W. Leuven & A. J. M. Smits, 2005. Flooding ecology of voles, mice and shrews: the importance of geomorphological and vegetational heterogeneity in river floodplains. Acta Theriologica 50: 453–473.Google Scholar
  45. Wijnhoven, S., G. van der Velde, R. S. E. W. Leuven & A. J. M. Smits, 2006. Modelling recolonisation of heterogeneous river floodplains by small mammals. Hydrobiologia 565: 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Witter, J. V., H. T. C. van Stokkom & G. Hendriksen, 2006. From river management to river basin management: a water manager’s perspective. Hydrobiologia 565: 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer2006 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. van der Velde
    • 1
    • 5
  • R. S. E. W. Leuven
    • 2
    • 5
  • A. M. J. Ragas
    • 2
    • 5
  • A. J. M. Smits
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Animal Ecology and EcophysiologyInstitute for Wetland and Water Research, Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Environmental ScienceInstitute for Wetland and Water Research, Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Centre for Water and SocietyNijmegenRadboud University NijmegenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Erasmus Centre for Sustainability and ManagementErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Member of the Netherlands Centre for River Studies (NCR)DelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations