Advertisement

Changing estuaries, changing views

  • A. J. M. Smits
  • P. H. Nienhuis
  • H. L. F. Saeijs
Chapter
  • 852 Downloads
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 187)

Abstract

During the design and the execution of the Delta project, carried out after the storm flood of 1953 in the SW Netherlands, the importance of the long-term effects of morphological and ecological developments driven by tides and currents, have been underestimated. Due to these processes the height of the dams will have to be increased for centuries to come, because the land behind the levees cannot grow in elevation anymore with the rising of the sea. Maintenance of the civil-engineering structures, and mitigating their unpredictable impacts on ecosystems, involve very high recurrent costs. The chance of flooding is reduced, but the potential damage after a storm flood is enlarged: seawalls and dykes provide a false sense of safety against flooding. Changes in the role of agricultural use in the European context, offer an opportunity to abandon arable fields and to retrocede them to the sea in order to absorb tidal energy and to allow the land to rise concomitant with the sea. A cost-benefit analysis of this approach should assess the direct and indirect economic values, as well as the non-use (intrinsic) values, whereby public engagement in management questions, facilitates decision-making processes. Reversible and resilient economic measures within the limits of the natural processes are preferable. A future, speculative perspective is an urbanised landscape, where people and investments are located in safe places, e.g. on floating, or sea-encircled artificial dwelling-mounds, surrounded by a landscape that is ruled by the forces of nature. New approaches such as developed in the Westerschelde offer flexible solutions to flooding problems, and are worth a broader evaluation. A worldwide platform of experts should be organised to study the future management of estuaries and deltas, and to develop and exchange new ideas and techniques.

Key words

closure dams estuaries flooding offensive water management potential risks return tidal dynamics SW Netherlands 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bloemers, J. H. F. & T. van Dorp, 1991. Pre-and protohistorie van de lage landen. Open Universiteit, Unieboek, Houten (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  2. Bouma, J. J. & H. L. F. Saeijs, 2000. Eco-centric cost-benefit analysis for hydraulic engineering in river basins. In Smits, A. J. M., P. H. Nienhuis & R. S. E. W. Leuven (eds), New Approaches to River Management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 167–178.Google Scholar
  3. Costanza, R., R. d’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, S. Naeem, K. Limburg, J. Paruelo, R. V. O′Neill, R. Raskin, P. Sutton & M. van den Belt, 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Jonge, V. N., 1983. Relations between annual dredging activities, suspended matter concentrations, and the development of the tidal regime in the Ems estuary. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40 (suppl. 1): 289–300.Google Scholar
  5. De Jonge, V. N. & D. J. de Jong, 2002. Ecological restoration in coastal areas in the Netherlands, concepts, dilemmas and some examples. Hydrobiologia 478: 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huisman, P., W. Cramer, G. van Ee, J. C. Hooghart, H. Salz & E. C. Zuidema (eds), 1998. Water in the Netherlands. Netherlands Hydrological Society, Delft: 1–186.Google Scholar
  7. Kerkhofs, M. J. J., T. Tiebosch, J. A. van der Velden & J. W. M. Kuijpers, 2005. Alternative management of the Haringvliet sluices: the first step towards major rehabilitation of the Rhine-Meuse estuary. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement 155, Large Rivers 15: 569–578.Google Scholar
  8. Kuijpers, J. W. M., 1995. Ecological restoration of the Rhine-Maas estuary. Water Science and Technology 31: 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nienhuis P. H., 1982. De oecologische consequenties van de Deltawerken. In Wolff, W. J. (ed.), Wadden, Duinen, Delta. Biologische Raad Reeks, PUDOC, Wageningen: 101–132 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  10. Nienhuis, P. H., 2006. Water and values: ecological research as the basis for water management and nature management. Hydrobiologia 565: 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nienhuis, P. H. & A. C. Smaal, 1994. The Oosterschelde estuary (the Netherlands), a case-study of a changing ecosystem. Hydrobiologia 282/283: 1–597.Google Scholar
  12. RIKZ, 2004. Verlopend getij. Oosterschelde, een veranderend natuurmonument. RIKZ Rapport (2004).028. Rijksinstituut voor Kust en Zee, Middelburg: 1–80 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  13. RIVM, 2004. Risico’s in bedijkte termen. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, Milieu-en Natuurplanbureau-RIVM rapport 500799002, RIVM, Bilthoven: 1–242 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  14. Saeijs, H. L. F., Pieters T. & Turkstra E., 1993. Van graven met de hand tot beheren met verstand. Visie op de toekomst van het Schelde-estuarium. Symposium volume Hogeschool Zeeland Gazet 6(8/9): 5–9 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  15. Saeijs, H. L. F., A. J. M. Smits, W. Overmars & D. Willems, 2004. Changing Estuaries, Changing Views. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Radboud University Nijmegen, XXL Press, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  16. Schuijt, K., 2001. The economic value of lost natural functions of the Rhine river basin; costs of human development of the Rhine river basin ecosystem. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Publication Series 36: 1–42.Google Scholar
  17. Slager, K., 2003. De Ramp; een reconstructie van de watersnood van 1953. Atlas, Amsterdam/Antwerpen (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  18. Smit, H., G. van der Velde, R. G. Smits & H. Coops, 1997. Ecosystem developments in the Rhine-Meuse Delta during two decades after enclosure and steps towards estuary restoration. Estuaries 20: 504–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stikvoort, E., J. Graveland & R. Eertman, 2002. Leve(n)de Noordrand. Pragmatische toekomstvisie voor het ecologische herstel van het Rotterdamse havengebied. Rapport RIKZ, Den Haag/2002.032 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  20. Tinbergen, J., 1959. Socio-economic aspects of the Delta Plan. Report Delta Commission, Contribution VI, Research with importance to the design of dykes and dams. Rijkswaterstaat, Den Haag: 66–74 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  21. Tosserams, M., E. H. R. R. Lammens & M. Platteeuw, 2002. Het Volkerak-Zoommeer; de ecologische ontwikkeling van een afgesloten zeearm. RIZA Rapport 2000.024. Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Lelystad (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  22. Van Dantzig, D., 1959. The economic decision problem related to flood management in the Netherlands. Report Delta Commission, Contribution II,2, Research with importance to the design of dykes and dams. Rijkswaterstaat, Den Haag, 58–110 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  23. Van den Bergh, E., S. van Damme, J. Graveland, D. J. de Jong, I. Baten & P. Meire, 2003. Voorstel voor natuurontwikkelingsmaatregelen ten behoeve van de Ontwikkelingsschets 2010 voor het Schelde estuarium. Werkdocument RIKZ/OS/2003.825x. RIKZ, Middelburg (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  24. Van den Bergh, E., P. Meire, M. Hoffmann & T. Ysebaert, 1999. Natuurherstelplan Zeeschelde: drie mogelijke inrichtingsvarianten. Rapport IN 99/18. Instituut voor Natuurbehoud, Brussels (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  25. Van den Born, J. G., H. J. R. Lenders, W. T. De Groot & E. Huijsman, 2001. The new biophilia: an exploration of visions of nature in Western countries. Environmental Conservation 28: 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Van Stokkom, H. T. C., A. J. M. Smits & R. S. E. W. Leuven, 2005. Flood defence in the Netherlands: a new era, a new approach. Water International 30: 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer2006 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. M. Smits
    • 1
    • 3
  • P. H. Nienhuis
    • 2
  • H. L. F. Saeijs
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Water and SocietyRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute for Wetland and Water Research, Department of Environmental ScienceRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Erasmus Centre for Environmental StudiesErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations