Discursive shifts in Dutch river management: ‘deep’ institutional change or adaptation strategy?

  • M. A. Wiering
  • B. J. M. Arts
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 187)


This paper argues that a discursive shift is taking place in Dutch water policy, from ‘a battle against water’ to ‘living with water’ or ‘accommodating water’. Yet we ask ourselves whether this shift is just an adaptation strategy of the existing elite group of water managers, who pay lip-service to new management approaches in order to maintain their vested interests, as some authors claim, or whether it implies ‘deep’ institutional change, e.g. in terms of the emergence of new water institutions, power relations and procedures. While investigating this question, we make use of the ‘policy arrangement approach’, which pays attention to institutional and discursive aspects of policy making alike. Our conclusion is that we are currently observing institutional changes beyond ‘policy talk’, particularly in terms of new legislation and procedures. However, it is too early to speak of ‘deep’ institutional change in Dutch water management, because the former water institutions are still maintaining their power positions, despite the availability of additional resources for policy and research as well as the emergence of several new modes of governance.

Key words

discourse analysis institutional change new modes of governance river basin approach policy arrangement approach water management 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arts, B. J. M., 1998. The Political Influence of Global NGOs. Case Studies on the Climate and Biodiversity Conventions. International Books, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  2. Arts, B. & P. Leroy (eds), 2003. Verandering van politiek, vernieuwing van milieubeleid. Klassieke en post-moderne arrangementen. Nijmegen University Press, Nijmegen (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  3. Backes, Ch. W., 1999. Towards international water boards and cross-border spatial plans? In Van Hall, A., G. Th. Drupsteen, & H. J. M. Havekes (eds), The State of Water. Koninklijke Vermande, Lelystad: 179–194 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  4. Boonstra, F., 2004. Laveren tussen regio’s en regels. Verankering van beleidsarrangementen rond plattelandsontwikkeling in Noordwest Friesland, de Graafschap en Zuidwest Salland. Van Gorcum, Assen (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  5. Disco, C., 2002. Remaking nature: the ecological turn in Dutch water management. Science, Technology and Human Values 27: 206–235.Google Scholar
  6. Giddens, A., 1984. The Constitution of Society. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Godfroij, A. J. A. & N. J. M. Nelissen (eds), 1993. Verschuivingen in de Besturing van de Samenleving. Coutinho, Bussum (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  8. Hajer, M. A., 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Haverland, M., 1999. National Autonomy, European Integration and the Politics of Packaging Waste. Thela-thesis, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  10. Huberts, L. & J. Kleinnijenhuis (eds), 1994. Methoden van Invloedsanalyse. Boom, Meppel (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  11. Kickert, W., E. Klijn & J. Koppejan (eds), 1997. Managing Complex Networks. Strategies for the Public Sector. SAGE, London.Google Scholar
  12. Marsh, D. & R. A. W. Rhodes (eds), 1992. Policy networks in British government. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Memorandum, 2004. Integratie van Waterwetgeving. Parliamentary Paper 29694, No. 1. Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, Den Haag (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  14. Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Conservation & Food Quality, 2003. Lonkend Rivierenland. National Forest Service, Driebergen (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  15. Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, 2000. A Different Approach to Water, Water Management Policy in the 21st Century. [English version 2001] http://
  16. Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, 2003. Nationaal Bestuursakkoord Water. Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Den Haag (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  17. Remmelzwaal, A. & J. Vroon 2000. Werken met water, veerkracht als strategie. Report 2000.021. RIZA, Lelystad (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  18. Rittberger, V. (eds), 1993. Regime Theory and International Relations. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Sabatier, P. A. & H. C. Jenkins Smith (eds), 1993. Policy Change and Learning, an Advocacy Coalition Approach. West View Press Inc., Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  20. Smits, A. J. M., P. H. Nienhuis & R. S. E. W. Leuven (eds), 2000. New Approaches to River Management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.Google Scholar
  21. Therborn, G., 1980. The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology. Verso NLB, London.Google Scholar
  22. Van de Bilt, S., 2004. Eén terrein, waar twee beheren. MSc-thesis Political Sciences of the Environment. Radboud University, Nijmegen (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  23. Van Eeten, M., 1999. Dialogues of the Deaf, Defining New Agendas for Environmental Deadlocks. Eburon, Delft.Google Scholar
  24. Van Hemert, M., 1999. Ruimte voor de ingenieur, rivierbeheer in Nederland eind jaren negentig. Kennis en Methode, Tijdschrift voor Empirische Filosofie 23: 361–387.Google Scholar
  25. Van Leussen, W., 2002. Leven met water, vermaatschappelijking van het waterbeheer-consequenties voor de civiel ingenieur en voor waterbeheerorganisaties. Inaugural address Universiteit Twente, Enschede (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  26. Van Steen, P. J. M. & P. H. Pellenbarg, 2004. Water management challenges in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 95: 590–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Stokkom, H. T. C., A. J. M. Smits & R. S. E. W. Leuven, 2005. Flood defense in the Netherlands: a new era, a new approach. Water International 30: 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Van Tatenhove, J., B. Arts & P. Leroy (eds), 2000. Political Modernization and the Environment. The Renewal of Environmental Policy Arrangements. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  29. Van de Ven, G. P., 2004. Man-made Lowlands. History of Water Management and Land Reclamation in the Netherlands. Matrijs, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  30. Wiering, M. A. & P. P. J. Driessen, 2001. Beyond the art of diking. Interactive policy on river management in the Netherlands. Water Policy 3: 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wiering, M. A. & I. F. G. Immink, 2003. Nieuwe beleidsarrangementen voor waterbeheer en ruimtelijke ordening? In Hidding, M. & M. Van der Vlist (eds), Water en Ruimte. SDU Uitgevers bv, The Hague (in Dutch): 183–196.Google Scholar
  32. Wisserhof, J., 2000. Inventarisatie kennisinfrastructuur. Report NRLO/2000/4. Nationale Raad voor Landbouwkundig Onderzoek, Adviesraad voor het Wetenschaps-en Technologiebeleid, Raad voor het Milieu-en Natuuronderzoek. The Hague (in Dutch).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer2006 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Wiering
    • 1
  • B. J. M. Arts
    • 1
  1. 1.Political Sciences of the EnvironmentNijmegen School of Management, Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations