Advertisement

From river management to river basin management: a water manager’s perspective

  • J. V. Witter
  • H. T. C. van Stokkom
  • G. Hendriksen
Chapter
  • 839 Downloads
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 187)

Abstract

Because of climate change and the need for sustainable water systems, water management has changed considerably in recent years, from river management to basin management. This change is illustrated for both the main Dutch river system and a small, representative regional water system in the Netherlands. This change results in four major challenges, (1) creating an effective regional administration which functions as a network authority, (2) increasing collaboration with other water managers, (3) increasing efficiency and achieving goals at minimum cost, and (4) communicating in an open manner with stakeholders. The article outlines the way in which water managers try to address these challenges. Special attention is given to the need for increased coordination between environmental policies and water policies.

Key words

network authority sustainable water systems stakeholder analysis environmental policy joint planning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous, 1936. Verslag inzake onderzoek verbetering afwatering Mark en Dintel en verbinding Mark-Vliet. Province of Noord-Brabant, Den Bosch (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous, 1999. Fourth national policy document on water management. Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, The Hague.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous, 2005. Ontwerp planologische kernbeslissing Ruimte voor de Rivier. Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management and Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment, The Hague (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  4. Bruin, A. T. H., 2002. Verandering in neerslagkarakteristieken in Nederland gedurende de periode 1901-2001. Royal Dutch Meteorological Institute, De Bilt (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  5. Buijse, A., F. Klijn, R. S. E. W. Leuven, H. Middelkoop, F. Schiemer, J. Thorp & H. Wolfert, 2005. Rehabilitation of large rivers: references, achievements and integration into river management. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement 155 (1-4) Large Rivers 15(1-4): 715–738.Google Scholar
  6. De Jonge, V. N. & D. J. de Jong, 2002. Ecological restoration in coastal areas in the Netherlands, concepts, dilemmas and some examples. Hydrobiologia 478: 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dister, E., P. Obrdlik & E. Schneider, 1990. Water management and ecological perspectives of the Upper Rhine’s floodplains. Regulated Rivers 5: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huisman, P., W. Cramer, G. van Ee, J. C. Hooghart, H. Salz & F. C. Zuidema, 1998. Water in the Netherlands. Netherlands Hydrological Society, Delft.Google Scholar
  9. Hunsberger, C. A., R. B. G ibson & S. K. Wismer, 2005. Citizen involvement in sustainability-centred environmental assessment follow-up. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25: 609–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leuven, R. S. E. W., A. J. M. Smits & P. H. Nienhuis, 2000. From integrated approaches to sustainable river basin management. In Smits, A. J. M., P. H. Nienhuis & R. S. E. W. Leuven (eds), New Approaches to River Management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 329–347.Google Scholar
  11. Morrison, K., 2003. Stakeholder involvement in water management: necessity or luxury? Water Science and Technology 47: 43–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nienhuis, P. H., A. D. Buise, R. S. E. W. Leuven, A. J. M. Smits, R. J. W. de Nooij & E. M. Samborska, 2002. Ecological rehabilitation of the lowland basin of the river Rhine (NW Europe). Hydrobiologia 478: 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. RIVM, 2004. Risico’s in bedijkte termen: een evaluatie van het beleid inzake de veiligheid tegen overstromen. Dutch Institute for Public Health and Environment, Bilthoven, Report no 500799002. (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  14. Smits, A. J. M., P. H. Nienhuis & H. L. F. Saeijs, 2006. Changing estuaries, changing views. Hydrobiologia 565: 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Van der Ham, J., 2004. Afleiden of opruimen? De strijd om de beste aanpak tegen rivierbederf. Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management (RIZA), Lelystad. (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  16. Van de Ven, G. P, 2004. Man-made Lowlands. Uitgeverij Matrijs, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  17. Van Stokkom, H. T. C., A. J. M. Smits & R. S. E. W. Leuven, 2005. Flood defense in The Netherlands: a new era, a new approach. Water International 30: 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wiering, M. A. & B. J. M. Arts, 2006. Discursive shifts in Dutch river management: _deep_ institutional change or adaptation strategy? Hydrobiologia 565: 327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Witter, V. J. & T. Raats, 2001. Hydrological criteria for durable water systems. In Schumann, A. H., M. C. Acreman, R. Davis, M. A. Marino, D. Rosbjerg & J. Xia (eds), Regional Management of Water Resources. IAHS Publication 268: 231–238.Google Scholar
  20. Witter, V. J., 2003. Small hydrological basins in delta regions, past and future (climatic) changes: the Mark-Vliet basin. Water Resources Systems-Water availability and Global Change. IAHS Publication 280: 3–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer2006 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. V. Witter
    • 1
  • H. T. C. van Stokkom
    • 1
  • G. Hendriksen
    • 2
  1. 1.Brabantse Delta Water BoardBredaThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water ManagementArnhemThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations