Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 187))

Abstract

Despite the major advances in science to underpin water resources and river management that have taken place over the past two decades, a need remains to establish a unifying framework that will lead to new, appropriate tools for water resources management. In Europe, this need has been highlighted by the promotion of the Water Framework Directive. From a scientific perspective, key questions focus on the ecological significance of flow variability over a range of timescales and the linkage between flow variability, habitat variability and biological population responses, and the biological interactions among these populations. Creation of scientifically sound tools requires development of knowledge at the level of first principles to realize sustainable developments within the context of adaptive management. Similitude analyses provide a mechanism for upscaling from fine ‘research’ scales to the coarser scales of water resource managers. Lack of appropriate data is the major obstacle to the development of these tools, especially those concerned with large rivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amon, R. M. W., G. Budeus & B. Meon, 2003. Dissolved organic carbon distribution and origin in the Nordic Seas: exchanges with the Arctic Ocean and the North Atlantic. Journal of Geophysical Research 108/27: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, E., C. Nilsson & M.E. Johansson, 2000. Effects of river fragmentation on plant dispersal and riparian flora. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 16: 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A., 2001. Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix characterisation of some sewage impacted rivers. Environmental Science and Technology 35: 948–953.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A., 2002. Fluorescence properties of some farm wastes: implications for water quality monitoring. Water Research 36: 189–194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boon, P. J., B. R. Davies & G. E. Petts, (eds), 2000. Global Perspectives on River Conservation. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattanéo, F., N. Lamouroux, P. Breil & H. Capra, 2002. The influence of hydrological and biotic processes on brown trout (Salmo trutta) population dynamics. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capra, H., C. Sabaton, V. Gournaud, Y. Souchon & P. Lim, 2003. A population dynamics model and habitat simulation as a tool to predict brown trout demography in natural and bypassed stream reaches. River Research and Applications 19: 551–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cioffi, F. & F. Gallerano, 2003. A 2D self-adaptive hydrodynamic scheme for the assessment of the effects of structures on flooding phenomena in river basins. River Research and Applications 19: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, M., 2002. Geomorphic thresholds in riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology 47: 541–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. J., 2002. Dealing with uncertainty: adaptive approaches to sustainable river management. Aquatic Conservation 12: 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D. & G. E. Petts (eds), 1990. Water, Engineering and Landscape. Belhaven Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Agency, 2001. Our Vision: Making It Happen. Environment Agency, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, H., A. Sukhodolov, S. Wilczek & C. Engelhardt, 2003. Effects of flow dynamics and sediment movement on microbial activity in a lowland river. River Research and Applications 19: 473–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geerling, G. W., A. M. J. Ragas, R. S. E. W. Leuven, J. H. van den Berg, M. Breedveld, D. Liefhebber & A. J. M. Smits, 2006. Succession and rejuvenation in floodplains along the river Allier (France). Hydrobiologia 565: 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, J. M., A. M. Gurnell, P. G. Angold & I. P. Morrissey, 2002. Riparian seed banks along the lower River Dove, UK: their structure and ecological implications. Geomorphology 47: 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouraud, V., J. L. Baglinière, P. Baran, C. Sabaton, P. Lim & D. Ombredane, 2001. Factors regulating brown trout populations in two French rivers: application of a dynamic population model. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17: 557–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurnell, A. M. & G. E. Petts, 2002. Island-dominated landscapes of large floodplain rivers, a European perspective. Freshwater Biology 47: 581–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, K., 2004. Classifying ecological status under the European Water Framework Directive: the need for monitoring to account for natural variability. Aquatic Conservation 14: 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junk, W. J., P. B. Bayley & R. E. Sparks, 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. In Dodge D. P. (ed.), Proceedings International Large River Symposium. Canadian Special Publication Fisheries Aquatic Sciences 106: 110–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latterell, J. J., K. D. Fausch, C. Gowan & S. C. Riley, 1998. Relationship of trout recruitment to snowmelt runoff flows and adult trout abundance in six Colorado Mountain streams. Rivers 6: 240–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuven, R. S. E. W., A. J. M. Smits & P. H. Nienhuis, 2000. From integrated approaches to sustainable river basin management. In Smits, A. J. M., P. H. Nienhuis & R. S. E. W. Leuven (eds), New Approaches to River Management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 329–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, P. & M. Furse, 2002. Preparing for the European Water Framework Directive-making the links between habitat and aquatic biota. Aquatic Conservation 12: 425–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau, M., S. Naeem, P. Inchausti, J. Bengtsson, J.P. Grime, A. Hector, D. U. Hooper, M. A. Huston, D. Raffaelli, B. Schmid, D. Tilman & D. A. Wardle, 2001. Ecology-biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294: 804–808.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, A. M., J. E. Brittain & G. E. Petts, 2001. Trends of macroinvertebrate community structure in glacier-fed rivers in relation to environmental conditions: a synthesis. Freshwater Biology 46: 1833–1848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J., S. E. Bunn, C. Nilsson, G. E. Petts, G. Pinay & L. Thompson, 2002. Legitimizing fluvial ecosystems as users of water: an overview. Environmental Management 30: 455–467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nienhuis, P. H. & R. S. E. W. Leuven, 2001. River restoration and flood protection: controversy or synergism. Hydrobiologia 444: 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasternack, G. B., C. L. Wang & J. E. Merz, 2004. Application of a 2D hydrodynamic model to design of reseach-scale spawning gravel replenishment on the Mokelumne River, California. River Research and Applications 20: 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts, G. E., 1987. Timescales for ecological change in regulated rivers. In Craig, J. & J. B. Kemper (eds), Regulated Streams: Advances in Ecology. Plenum, New York, 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petts, G. E., 1996. Water allocation to protect river ecosystems. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12: 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts, G. E., 2000. A perspective on the abiotic processes sustaining the ecological integrity of running waters. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petts, G. E., M. A. Bickerton, C. Crawford, D. N. Lerner & D. Evans, 1999. Flow management to sustain groundwater-dominated stream ecosystems. Hydrological Processes 13: 497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts, G. E. & A. M. Gurnell, 2005. Dams and geomorphology: research progress and future directions. Geomorphology 71: 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts, J. I., S. Owens & H. Bulkeley, 2005. Summary of discussions and recommendations. ESRC Transdisciplinary Seminar Series: knowledge and power, exploring the science/ society interface in the urban environment context. http://www.cert.bham.ac.uk/urbanenvironments/index.htm.

  • Poff, N. L. & J. V. Ward, 1989. Implication of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of streamflow patterns. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46: 1805–1818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. A. Palmer, D. D. Hart, B. D. Richter, A. H. Arthington, K. H. Rogers, J. L. Meyer & J. A. Stanford, 2003. River flows and water wars? Emerging science for environmental decision-making. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 298–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. Richter, R. Sparks & J. Stromberg, 1997. The natural flow regime: a new paradigm for riverine conservation and restoration. BioScience 47: 769–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L. & J. V. Ward, 1990. The physical habitat template of lotic systems: recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatio-temporal heterogeneity. Environmental Management 14: 629–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L. & J. D. Allan, 1995. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrologic variability. Ecology 76: 606–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postel, S. & S. Carpenter, 1997. Freshwater ecosystem services. In Daily, G. C. (ed.), Nature’s Services. Island Press. Washington DC: 195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railsback, S. F. & B. C. Harvey, 2003. An Individual-based Trout Model for Instream Flow Assessment: Validity, Advantages, and Disadvantages International IFIM Users’ Workshop. Fort Collins: Colorado USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H., A. V. Brown, A. P. Covich, M. E. Gurtz, H. W. Li, G. W. Minshall, S. R. Reice, A. L. Sheldon, J. B. Wallace & R. C. Wissmar, 1988. The role of disturbance in stream ecology. Journal of North American Benthological Society 7: 433–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, K., J. Brasington & F. Hughes, 2002. Geomorphic dynamics of floodplains: ecological implications and a potential modelling strategy. Freshwater Biology 47: 559–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, J. Powell & P. D. Braun, 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10: 1163–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, R. Wingington & P. D. Braun, 1997. How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biology 37: 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, J. P., D. Bell & A. P. Fowles, 2004. The hydroecological controls and conservation value of beetles on exposed riverine sediments in England and Wales. Biological Conservation 118: 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauvage, S., S. Teissier, P. Vervier, T. Ameziane, F. Garabetian, F. Delmas & B. Caussade, 2003. A numerical tool to integrate biophysical diversity of a large regulated river: hydrobiogeochemical bases. The case of the Garonne River (France). River Research and Applications 19: 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsaburgh, R. L. & S. E. G. Findley, 2003. Dissolved organic matter: out of the black box and into the mainstream. In: Findlay, S. E. G. & R. L. Sinsabaugh (eds), Aquatic Ecosystems: Interactivity of DOM, Academic Press: 479–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits, A. J. M., P. H. Nienhuis & H. L. F. Saeijs, 2006. Changing estuaries, changing views. Hydrobiologia 565: 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, J. A., J. V. Ward, W. J. Liss, C. A. Frissell, R. N. Williams, J. A. Lichatowich & C. C. Coutant, 1996. A general protocol for restoration of regulated rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12: 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabacchi, E., D. L. Correll, R. Hauer, G. Pinay, A.-M. Planty-Tabacchi & R. C. Wissmar, 1998. Development, maintenance and role of riparian vegetation in the river landscape. Freshwater Biology 40: 497–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tockner, K., F. Malard & J. V. Ward, 2000. An extension of the flood pulse concept. Hydrological Processes 14: 2861–2883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, C. R., 1989. The patch dynamic concept of stream community ecology. Journal North American Benthological Society 8: 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Stokkom, H. T. C., A. J. M. Smits & R. S. E. W. Leuven, 2005. Flood defense in the Netherlands: a new era, a new approach. Water International 30/1: 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannotte, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vugteveen, P., R. S. E. W. Leuven, M. A. J. Huijbregts & H. J. R. Lenders, 2006. Redefinition and elaboration of river ecosystem health: perspective for river management. Hydrobiologia 565: 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C., 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. Blackburn Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V., K. Tockner, U. Uehlinger & F. Malard, 2001. Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17: 311 323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, D. & B. Shelby, 2000. Managed flow regimes and resources values: traditional versus alternative strategies. Rivers 7: 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer2006

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Petts, G.E., Nestler, J., Kennedy, R. (2006). Advancing science for water resources management. In: Leuven, R.S.E.W., Ragas, A.M.J., Smits, A.J.M., van der Velde, G. (eds) Living Rivers: Trends and Challenges in Science and Management. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 187. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5367-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics