Drawing on the work of Foucault, Rose and actor-network theory this chapter examines some of the methodological and theoretical implications of this work for conceptions of workplace learning. We suggest that workplaces need to be examined for the spatio-temporal ordering of practices and the actors drawn into them in order to move beyond the totalizing discourses of for instance, the knowledge economy, globalization, performativity and even workplace learning itself. We argue that there is no single trajectory for workplace subjectivities and that pedagogic practices are embedded in the actor-networks of specific workplaces. These networks can be formulated as part of those actions at a distance associated with the development of governmental power in contemporary social orders. This is illustrated by way of a critique of discourses that posit a move from disciplined, Fordist work to flexible Post-Fordist forms of work. In this way, we seek to locate discussions of workplace learning within the wider debates in the social sciences about changing practices of governing and the differing forms of subjectivity associated with them. The chapter is intended to illuminative and is theory driven
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 619-44.
Barry, A. (2001). Political machines: Governing a technological society. London: The Athlone Press.
Burchell, B., Day, D., Hudson, M., Lapido, D., Mankelow, R., Nolan, J., Reed, H., Witchert, I. & Wilkinson, F. (1999). Findings: Job insecurity and work intensification. York: Joseph Rowntree Trust.
Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality. London: Sage.
du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison, Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. Martin, H. Gutman, and P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the Self (pp. 16-49). London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (2003) Society must be defended. London: Allen Lane.
Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.) Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
Miller, P. & Rose, N. (1993) Governing economic life. In M. Gane & T. Johnson (Eds.), Foucault’s new domains. London: Routledge.
Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. London: Falmer Press.
Parker, M. (2000). Organizational culture and identity. London: Sage.
Rose, N. (1991). Governing the soul. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rose, N. (1998). Inventing ourselves. Cambridge: Policy Press.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Edwards, R., Nicoll, K. (2007). Action at a Distance: Governmentality, Subjectivity and Workplace Learning. In: Billett, S., Fenwick, T., Somerville, M. (eds) Work, Subjectivity and Learning. Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5360-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5360-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5359-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5360-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)