Skip to main content

The Role of Moral Reasoning and the Status of Socioscientific Issues in Science Education

Philosophical, Psychological and Pedagogical Considerations

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Science & Technology Education Library ((CTISE,volume 19))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York, New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G.S. (1992). The integration of STS into science education. Theory into Practice, 31(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S., Fleming, R. W., & Ryan, A. G. (1987). High school graduates’ beliefs about science-technology-society: I. Methods and issues in monitoring student views. Science Education, 71(2), 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. (1906). Social and ethical interpretations in mental development. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W. (1985). The role of discussion in moral education. In M. W. Berkowitz & F. Oser (Eds.), Moral education: Theory and application (p.197–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W. (1987). The development of sociomoral discourse. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral development through social interaction. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W. (1996). The “plus one” convention revisited...and beyond. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association of Moral Education, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W. (1997). The complete moral person: Anatomy and formation. In J. M. DuBois, (Ed.), Moral issues in psychology: Personalist contributions to selected problems. New York: University Press of America, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W. (1998). Finding common ground to study and implement character education: Integrating structure and content in moral education. Journal of Research in Education, 8(1), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W., Oser, F. & Althof, W. (1987). The development of sociomoral discourse. In W.M. Kurtines & J.L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral development through social interaction (337–345). New York: J. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, L. E. (1997). The moral contours of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 48, 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W., Powell, J. C., Ellis, J. D., Giese, J. R. Parisi, L., & Singleton, L. (1991). Integrating the history and nature of science and technology in science social studies curriculum: A rationale. Science Education, 75(1), 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpendale, J. I. & Krebs, D. L. (1992). Situational variation in moral judgment: In a stage or on a stage? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1987). Feminism and difference: Gender, relation, and difference in psychoanalytic perspective. In M. Walsh (Ed.), The psychology of woman (p. 249–264). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1989). Feminism and psychoanalytic theory. New Haven: Yale University Press. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Ministers of Education Canada (CMEC) Pan Canadian Science Project. (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes: K-12. [On-line] Available: http://www.qscc.qld.edu.au/kla.sose.publications.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A. & Kohlberg, L. (1975). The relationship between the development of formal operations and moral judgment. In D. Bush and S. Feldman (Eds.), Cognitive development and social development: Relationships and implications. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment. Vol. 2: Standard issue scoring manual. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, R., Dyas, L., Maddux, C.D. & Kochman, A. (2001). Principled moral reasoning and behavior of preservice teacher education students. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1930). Experience and conduct. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Psychologies of 1930. Worcester: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1974). Science as subject-matter and as a method. In D. Archambault (Editor), John Dewey on education. Chicago, Illinois: University Chicago Press. [1910]

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1978). Moral principles in education. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. [1909]

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1971). Stage-related properties of concept development. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 421–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H. & Miller, S. A. (1993). Cognitive development. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs: NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1977). Woman’s conceptions of self and morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47(4), 481–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. & Attanucci, J. (1988). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C., & Wiggins, G. (1987). The origin of morality in early childhood relationships. J. Kagan, & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (p. 277–305). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrum, D., Hackling, M. & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools: A research report prepared for the Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA) [Online] Available: http://www.detya.gov.au/schools/Publications/reports/science/chap2.htm#2.2.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampshire, S. (1983). Fallacies in moral reasoning. In A. MacIntyre, & S. Hauerwas (Eds.), Changing perspectives in moral philosophy. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, K. (1988). Adolescents’ solutions to dilemmas in fables: Two moral orientations-two problem solving strategies. In C. Gilligan, J. Ward, J. Taylor & B. Bardige (Eds.), Mapping the moral domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1970). The metaphysics of morals. In H. Reiss (Ed.), Kant’s political writings. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keasy, T., & Keasy, C. (1974), The mediation role of cognitive development in moral judgment. Child Development, 45, 291–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, M. W., (1996). The inseparability of morality and personal well being: The duty virtue debate in moral education-revisited. The Journal of Moral Education, 25(3), 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, M. W., & Ashley, K.D. (2001). Case-based approaches to professional ethics: A systematic comparison of students’ and ethicists’ moral reasoning. The Journal of Moral Education, 30(4) 377–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, M. W., Olson, D. (1995) Moral reasoning and moral concern: An alternative to Gilligan’s gender based hypothesis. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27(4), 420–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, M. W., Zeitz, C.M., & Resnick, L.B (2000). Judging the quality of peer-led student dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1), 55–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M. (1991). Social and moral development in early childhood. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz, (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development. Volume 2: Research (p. 115–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive developmental analysis of children’s sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1968). Early education: A cognitive-developmental approach. Child Development, 39, 1013–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969a). Stages in the development or moral thought and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969b). The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D.A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (p. 151–232). New York, New York: Academic Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1973a). Implication of developmental psychology for education: Examples from moral development. Educational Psychologist, 10, 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1973b). The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. LXX(18), 630–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row Publishers, Volume 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. In L. Kohlberg. (Ed.), Essays on moral development: Vol. 2: The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1985). The just community in theory and practice. In M. Berkowitz & F. Oser (Eds.), Moral education. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1986). A current statement on some theoretical issues. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and controversy (p. 485–546). Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1987). The cognitive-developmental approach to moral development. In P. F. Carbone Jr. (Ed.), Value theory and education (p. 226–243). Malabar, Florida: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., Boyd, D. & Levine, C. (1990). The return of stage six: Its principle and moral point of view. In T. Wren (Ed.), The moral domain: Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., & Candee, D. (1984). The relationship of moral judgment to moral action. In W. M. Kurtines, & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior and moral development. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. & Turiel, E. (1971). Moral development and moral education. In G. Lesser (Ed.), Psychology and educational practice. Glenview, IL, Scott Foresman & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolstø, S. (2001a). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstø. S. (2001b). “To trust or not to trust,...”-pupils’ ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 877–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D. L., Denton, K. & Wark, G. (1997). The forms and functions of real-life moral decision-making. Journal of Moral Education, 26(2), 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Langer, J., Kohlberg, L., & Haan, N.S. (1977). The development of formal operations in logical and moral judgment. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 95, 97–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1978) The methodology of scientific research programmes. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Langedale, S. (1988). Adolescents’ solutions to dilemmas in fables: Two moral orientations-two problem solving strategies. In C. Gilligan, J. Ward, J. Taylor & B. Bardige (Eds.), Mapping the moral domain. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lickona, T. (1976). Critical issues in the study of moral development and behavior. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1966). The meaning and measurement of ego development. American Psychologist, 21, 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N. (1982). Conceptions of self and morality and modes of moral choice: Identifying justice and care in judgments of actual moral dilemmas. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N. (1983). Two perspectives: On self relationships and morality. Harvard Education Review, 53(2), 125–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N. (1987). Ways of knowing, learning and making choices. Journal of Moral Education, 16(3), 226–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R. & Osborne, J. (Eds.), (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, D. (1980) Reasoning and the explanation of actions. Atlantic Highlands NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D. & Rest, J. (1995). The four components of acting morally. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral behavior and moral development: An introduction (p. 385–400). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L. P. (1989). Challenging conventional wisdom about morality: The domain approach to values education. In L. P. Nucci (Ed.), Moral development and character education (p. 183–203). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L. P., (2001) Education in the moral domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1986). The fragility of goodness: Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E. (1997). Septic tank crisis: A case study of science, technology and society education in an elementary school. International Journal of Science Education, 19(10), 1211–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E. (1999). Decision-making and STS education: Exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centres through an issues-based approach. School Science and Mathematics, 99(4), 174–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E. (2001). Teaching through science, technology, society and environment (STSE) education: Pre-service teachers’ delights and dilemmas. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child (M. Gabain, Trans.). Glencoe, Il: New York: Free Press (originally published in 1932).

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1960). The general problems of the psychological development of the child. In F.M. Tanner and Barbel Inhelder (Eds.), Discussion on Child Development, Volume IV. The Fourth Meeting of the World Health Organization Study Group on the Psychobiological Develop of the Child (3–27). Geneva, 1956. London: Faristock Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. W., Golding, G., Hunter, W., & Sampson, R. (1988). Sex differences in adult moral orientations. Journal of Personality, 56, 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queensland School Curriculum Council (QSCC) (2001). Studies of society and environment. [Online]. Available:http://www.cmec.ca/science/framework/index.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socioscientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1963). The sense of justice. Philosophical Review, 72(3), 281–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. (1990). Practical reason and norms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. (1986). The moral of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. (1998). Engaging reason: On the theory of value and action. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1985). An interdisciplinary approach to moral education. In M.W. Berkowitz & F. Oser (Eds.), Moral education: Theory and application (p. 9–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Narvaez, Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabar, N. (1979). Science, curriculum, and society: Trends in science curriculum. Science Education, 63(2), 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Chambers, W. F., & Zeidler, D.L. (in press). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in responses to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. & Zeidler, D.L. (in press). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolutions of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snarey, J. & Keljo, K. (1991). In a gemeinschaft voice: The cross-cultural expansion of moral development theory. In William M. Kurtines & Gewirtz, J.L. (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development. Volume 1: Theory (p. 395–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. & Aikenhead, G. (1994). STS education: International perspectives in reform. New York: Teachers’ College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, O. (1996). Decision making and the search for fundamental psychological regularities: What can be learned from a process perspective? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 252–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, S. J. (1994a). Moral judgment and moral action. In J. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (p. 199–211). Hillsdale, HJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, S. J. (1994b). Trends and issues in moral judgment research using the Defining Issues Test. Moral Education Forum, 19, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (1998). The development of morality. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (p. 863–932). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wark, G. & Krebs, D.L. (1996). Gender and dilemma differences in real-life moral judgment. Developmental Psychology, 32, 220–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L., (1989). A longitudinal study of moral reasoning. Child Development, 60, 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L., J., Pitts, R.C., Henning, K.H., Matsuba, M.K. (1995). Reasoning about morality and real-life moral problems. In M. Killen & D. Hart (Eds,), Morality in everyday life (p. 371–408). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L., de Vries, B., & Trevethan, S. (1987). Moral stages and moral orientation. Child Development, 58, 842–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. & Lutz, M. (1995). STS to enhance total curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 95(1), 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D.L. (1984). Moral issues and social policy in science education: Closing the literacy gap. Science Education, 68(4), 411–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. (1985). Hierarchial relationships among formal cognitive structures and their relationship to principled moral reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(5), 461–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L. (1997). The central role of fallacious thinking in science education. Science Education, 81(1), 483–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L. (2001). Participating in program development: Standard F. In D. Siebert & W. McIntosh (Eds.), College pathways to the science education standards (p. 18–22). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L. & Schafer, L.E. (1984). Identifying mediating factors of moral reasoning in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas, Science Education 86,343–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zeidler, D.L., Keefer, M. (2003). The Role of Moral Reasoning and the Status of Socioscientific Issues in Science Education. In: Zeidler, D.L. (eds) The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4996-X_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4996-X_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3855-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4996-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics