Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO Security through Science Series ((NASTB))

  • 1003 Accesses

Abstract

Target theory was the first successful attempt to describe biological phenomena in the language of theoretical physics. Its basic assumptions are still valid, and their validity can be proven with the help of modern techniques of molecular biology. The theory has also practical implications, e.g. the determination of molecular weights of enzymes which cannot be easily separated to allow standard molecular analysis. For the description of heavy charged particle action the original concept had to be broadened which led to the development of “microdosimetry”. Track structure analysis takes into account the spatial distribution of energy deposition at a nanometer scale and thus allowed an understanding of the action of heavy charged particles which is important both for the assessment of radiation risk to humans as well as to subminiature electronic circuits. New developments in radiation biology as, e.g., the “bystander effect” do not call the basic principles into question but ask for a rethinking about the nature of targets and the possible effects following radiation interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alper, T., Gillies, N., Elkind, M.M., 1960, The sigmoid survival curve in radiobiology, Nature. 186: 1062–1063.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, J.A., 1924, Some considerations relative to the action of X-rays on tissue cells. Proc. Royal Soc. (London) B96, 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessauer, F., 1922, Über einige Wirkungen von Strahlen. Z. Physik 12: 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempner E.S., Schlegel W., 1979, Size determination of enzymes by radiation inactivation. Anal Biochem. 92, :2–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kempner E.S., 1999, Advances in radiation target analysis. Anal Biochem. 276: 113–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kempner E.S., 1988, Molecular size determination of enzymes by radiation inactivation. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol.; 61: 107–147.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kempner E.S., 1993, Novel predictions from radiation target analysis. Trends Biochem Sci. 18: 236–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer J., Straaten H., 1986, A model of ion track structure based on classical collision dynamics. Phys Med Biol. 31: 1201–1209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, J., 1971, Target theory and survival curves. J Theor Biol. 30: 307–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, J., Rase S., Schopfer F., Schneider E., Weber K., Kraft G., 1983, Heavy ion action on yeast cells: inhibition of ribosomal-RNA synthesis, loss of colony forming ability and induction of mutants. Adv Space Res 3(8):115–125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, J., 2001, Radiation Biology – Glory of the past. Chances and challenges of the future. In: Korogodin V.I. (Ed.), Modern problems of Radiobiology, Radioecology and Evolution. Proc. of the Intern. Conf. dedicated to the Centenary of the Birth of N.W. Timofeeff-Ressovsky, Dubna, 6–9 September 2000, Dubna: JINR: 130–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne J.C. Jr., Miller J.H., Kempner E.S., 2000, Molecular mass and volume in radiation target theory. Biophys J. 78: 1698–1702.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prise K.M., Schettino G., Folkard M., Held K.D., 2005, New insights on cell death from radiation exposure. Lancet Oncol. 6: 520–528.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, H.H., Zaider, M., 1996, Microdosimetry and its application New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkamm, K., Lobrich, M., 2003, Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100: 5057–5062.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timofeeff-Ressovsky, N.W., Zimmer, K.G., 1947, Das Trefferprinzip in der Biologie. S. Hirzel Verlag Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timofeeff-Ressovsky, N.W., Zimmer, K.G., Delbrück, M., 1935, Über die Natur der Genmutation und der Genstruktur, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen VI( 1): 189–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, K.G., 1961, Studies on quantitative radiation biology, Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

KIEFER, J. (2006). TARGETS, HITS AND TRACKS. In: Cigna, A.A., Durante, M. (eds) Radiation Risk Estimates in Normal and Emergency Situations. NATO Security through Science Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4956-0_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics