Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Environment & Policy ((ENPO,volume 45))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albersen, P.J.J., Fischer, G., and Sun, L. (2000), Estimation of agricultural production relations in the LUCC model for China, IIASA Report IR-00-027, Laxenburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmeier, M., Herok, C.A., and Salamon, P. (2001), “Technical and institutional changes in an enlarged EU: Welfare effects for old and new members with a focus on the agri-food chain”, Proceedings 4th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, 27–29 June 2001, Purdue University, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N. (1999), “Xenotransplantation: Normalizing disgust”, Science as Culture, Vol. 8, pp. 327–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma, J. (2002), World agriculture: Towards 2015/2030, An FAO perspective, FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, C., Rosegrant, M., Steinfeld, H., Ehui, S., and Courbois, C. (1999), Livestock to 2020: The next food revolution, Available at <www.ifpri.cgiar.org/index1.asp>, IFPRI/FAO/ILRI, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAPRI (2004), Agricultural outlook 2004, Available at <www.fapri.iastate.edu>, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute, Ames (Iowa), USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois, J. (1998), Scale economies and imperfect competition in the GTAP model, GTAP Technical Paper No. 19, West Lafayette, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. (2002), “Constructing a selection environment: Competing expectations for CFC alternatives”, Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp. 935–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M., Quilley, S., and Beynon, H. (2002), Exploring the tomato: Transformations of nature, society and economy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herok, C.A. (2003), The introduction of meat substitutes from vegetable proteins: Consequences for EU agriculture on a global level, PROFETAS Project I3B Final Report, LEI, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyzer, M.A., Merbis, M.D., Pavel, I.F.P.W., and Van Wesenbeeck, C.F.A. (2005), “Diet shift towards meat and the effects on cereal use: Can we feed the animals in 2030?”, Ecological Economics, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyzer, M.A., and Van Wesenbeeck, C.F.A. (1999), “Trade models of imperfect competition”, in Ranis, G., and Raut, L.K. (Eds.), Trade, growth, and development, essays in honour of Professor T.N. Srinivasan, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C.E. (2001), The market system: What it is, how it works, and what to make of it, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesaroviç, M.D., and Pestel, E. (1974), Mankind at the turning point: The second report to the Club of Rome, Dutton, Reader’s Digest Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, F. (2004), “The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life”, Research Policy, Vol. 33, pp. 643–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nestle, M. (2002), Food politics: How the food industry influences nutrition and health, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004), Agricultural outlook 2004–2013, Available at <www.oecd.org>, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J.M., and Stuart, T.E. (1995), “A role-based ecology of technological change”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 100, pp. 1224–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, M. (1970), Synthetic food, John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulation (EC) (2003), Concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC, EU, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tongeren, F., and Van Meijl, H. (1999), Endogenous international technology spillovers and biased technical change in the GTAP model, GTAP Technical Paper No. 15, West Lafayette, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wesenbeeck, C.F.A. (2000), How to deal with imperfect competition? Introducing game theoretical concepts in a general equilibrium model of international trade, Tinbergen Institute Research Series 231, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wesenbeeck, C.F.A., and Pavel, I.F.P.W. (2004), Relieving the pressure: Alternative sources of protein for the year 2020, PROFETAS Research Document, SOW-VU, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijver, M. (2005), Protein politics, PhD thesis, Twente University, Enschede, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, T.L., Dimaranan, B.V., and McDougall, R.A. (2000), A base case scenario for the dynamic GTAP model, Available at <www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources>.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Boer, J., Vijver, M., van Wesenbeeck, L., Herok, C., Kuik, O. (2006). Social Desirability: National and International Context. In: Aiking, H., de Boer, J., Vereijken, J. (eds) Sustainable Protein Production and Consumption: Pigs or Peas?. Environment & Policy, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht . https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4842-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics