Summary
This paper addresses the topic of communicating the issue of hazardous chemicals to different audiences with regard to the ultimate goal of reducing the impact of chemicals on health and the environment. It is a broad topic, because action to reduce risk can be taken at many levels, ranging from the level of the individual right through to regulatory action to ban an individual chemical under a global Convention.
Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs), such as the International Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE) and the World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF), the global environment network, carefully plan their communication strategies to embrace a mix of target audiences, with a view to achieving the greatest protection of humans and/or the environment with their relatively scarce resources. This paper summarises some of the strategies adopted by WWF and ISDE, and considers more generally some of the questions that need to be addressed prior to embarking on a campaign.
Organisations also need to consider what their particular niche is, in terms of what they can do best, and where they will have most added-value. Vehicles for communication are numerous and include, amongst others, conferences, websites, leaflets, research journals and other publications. For some audiences, well-founded scientific arguments will be most persuasive, but other audiences may have a more emotional basis for determining what is acceptable. It therefore needs to be recognised that a mixture of different approaches will be required for communicating with different audiences, and also, to achieve the optimum results the approach may need to change over time. Furthermore, working with other groups and sharing experiences and knowledge can undoubtedly improve effectiveness.
Keywords
- Target Audience
- Endocrine Disrupter
- European Environment Agency
- World Wildlife Fund
- Private Sector Organization
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allanou, R. Hansen, B.G., and van der Bilt, Y. (1999) Public availability of data on EU High Production Volume chemicals, EUR 18996 EN, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Italy.
Colborn, T., and Clement, C. (eds) (1992), Chemically-Induced Alterations in Sexual and Functional Development: The Wildlife/Human Connection, Princeton Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., New Jersey.
Commission of the European Communities - CEC (2001) White Paper: Strategy for a future Chemicals Policy, 27.2.2001, COM (2001) 88 final, CEC, Brussels.
Eurobarometer (2003) Smoking and the environment: Actions and Attitudes. A survey requested by Directorate General Health and Consumer Protection and coordinated by Directorate General Press and Communication, Eurobarometer 183, European Commission, Brussels.
European Commission (2004) The European Environment and Health Action Plan 2004-2010. Communication for the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee, Brussels.
European Environment Agency - EEA (2001) Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000, ISBN 92-9167-323-4, Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
European Environment Agency - EEA and United Nations Environment Programme - UNEP (1998) Chemicals in the European Environment: Low Doses, High Stakes, The EEA and UNEP Annual Message 2 on the State of Europe ’s Environment, EEA and UNEP, Switzerland.
Food Standards Agency UK - FSA (2005) FSA website, [online] http://www.foodstandards.gov.uk/[last assessed on 15/09/2005].
Goldman, L. and Kuduru, S. (2000) Chemicals in the environment and developmental toxicity to children: A public health and policy perspective, Environ. Health Perspect, 108(Suppl 3), 443-448.
International Programme on Chemical Safety - IPCS (2002) Global Assessment of the State-of-The-Science of endocrine disrupters, World Health Organisation (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland.
International Society of Doctors for the Environment - ISDE (2001) Declaration on Children and their health and their environment, Washington. [online] http://www.isde.org [last assessed on 14/09/2001]
Jha, A. (2004) Co-op to ban group of perfume chemicals,May 13th Guardian, London, [online] http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1215478,00.html [last assessed on 05/10/2005]
Scientific Alliance (2003) Chemical Survey for Scientific Alliance - Topline Results, [online] http://www.scientific-alliance.com/MORI_chemicals_report_files/chemicals_poll_topline%20.htm [last assessed on 05/10/2005]
Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment – CSTEE (1999) Opinion on human and wildlife health effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals, with emphasis on wildlife and ecotoxicology test methods, Final report March 1999, European Commission, Brussels.
US Environmental Protection Agency - EPA (1998). Chemical hazard data availability study: what do we really know about the safety of HPV chemicals?EPA’s baseline of hazard information that is readily available to the public. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPTs), Washington, DC.
US House of Representatives (2004) A special interest case study: The Chemical Industry, the Bush Administration, and European Efforts to Regulate Chemicals,Prepared for Rep. Henry A. Waxman, US. House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform – Minority Staff Special Investigations Division, [online] www.reform.house.gov/min [last assessed on 05/10/2005]
World Health Organisation - WHO (2005) Children’s environmental health - Chemical hazards, [online] http://www.who.int/ceh/risks/cehchemicals/en/ [last assessed on 05/10/2005]
World Wildlife Fund for Nature - WWF (2004) Toxic chemicals - a threat to wildlife and humans [online] http://www.panda.org/campaign/detox/the_problem/blood_testing.cfm [last assessed on 05/10/2005]
World Wildlife Fund for Nature United Kingdom - WWF (2003) Chemicals and Health Campaign, [online] http://www.wwf.org.uk/chemicals/ [last assessed on 05/10/2005]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
LyonS, G., Illig, P. (2007). Getting The Message Across – WWF’S and ISDE’s Perspectives on Communication Strategies to Reduce Exposures to Hazardous Chemicals. In: Nicolopoulou-Stamati, P., Hens, L., Howard, C. (eds) Reproductive Health and the Environment. Environmental Science and Technology Library, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4829-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4829-7_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4828-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4829-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)