Abstract
Science-based approaches to support the conservation of marine biodiversity have been developed in recent years. They include measures of ‘rarity’, ‘diversity’, ‘importance’, biological indicators of water ‘quality’ and measures of ‘sensitivity’. Identifying the sensitivity of species and biotopes, the main topic of this contribution, relies on accessing and interpreting available scientific data in a structured way and then making use of information technology to disseminate suitably presented information to decision makers. The Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN) has achieved that research for a range of environmentally critical species and biotopes over the past four years and has published the reviews on the MarLIN Web site (www.marlin.ac.uk). Now, by linking the sensitivity database and databases of survey information, sensitivity mapping approaches using GIS are being developed. The methods used to assess sensitivity are described and the approach is advocated for wider application in Europe.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Borja, A., I. Muxika & J. Franco, 2003. The application of a marine biotic index to different impact sources affecting softbottom benthic communities along European coasts. Marine Pollution Bulletin 46: 835–845.
Davies C. E. & D. Moss, 2002. EUNIS Habitat Classification. Final Report to the European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity, European Environment Agency. February 2002. 125pp.
Gundlach, E. R. & M. O. Hayes, 1978. Classification of coastal environments in terms of potential vulnerability to oil spill damage. Marine Technology Society Journal 12: 18–27.
Hiscock, K., 1997. “Use available data”. Marine Pollution Bulletin 34: 74–77.
Hiscock, K., M. Elliott, D. Laffoley & S. Rogers, 2003. Data use and information creation: challenges for marine scientists and for managers. Marine Pollution Bulletin 46: 534–541.
Laffoley D. d’A., D. W. Connor, M. L. Tasker & T. Bines, 2000. Nationally important seascapes, habitats and species. A recommended approach to their identification, conservation and protection. Prepared for the DETR Working Group on the Review of Marine Nature Conservation by English Nature and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Peterborough, English Nature Research Report 392, 17 pp.
Sanderson, W., 1996. Rarity of marine benthic species in Great Britain: development and application of assessment criteria. Aquatic Conservation 6: 245–256.
Tyler-Walters H., K. Hiscock, D. B. Lear & A. Jackson, 2001. Identifying species and ecosystem sensitivities. Report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs from the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN), Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Plymouth. Contract CW0826.
Warwick, R.M. & K. R. Clarke, 2001. Practical measures of marine biodiversity based on relatedness of species. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review 39: 207–231.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H. (2006). Assessing the sensitivity of seabed species and biotopes — the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). In: Martens, K., et al. Marine Biodiversity. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 183. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4697-9_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4697-9_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4321-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4697-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)