Advertisement

Magnetopause Processes

  • T. D. Phan
  • C. P. Escoubet
  • L. Rezeau
  • R. A. Treumann
  • A. Vaivads
  • G. Paschmann
  • S. A. Fuselier
  • D. Attié
  • B. Rogers
  • B. U. Ö. Sonnerup
Part of the Space Sciences Series of ISSI book series (SSSI, volume 20)

Keywords

Solar Wind Current Sheet Magnetic Local Time Reconnection Rate Reconnection Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, B. J., T.-D. Phan, and S. A. Fuselier: 1997, ‘Relationships between plasma depletion and subsolar reconnection’. J. Geophys. Res. 102(11), 9531–9542.ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. R., T. E. Eastman, C. C. Harvey, M. M. Hoppe, B. T. Tsurutani, and J. Etcheto: 1982, ‘Plasma waves near the magnetopause’. J. Geophys. Res. 87(16), 2087–2107.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. André, M., A. Vaivads, S. C. Buchert, A. N. Fazakerley, and A. Lahiff: 2004, ‘Thin electron-scale layers at the magnetopause’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L03803, doi:10.1029/2003GL018137.Google Scholar
  4. Avanov, L. A., S. A. Fuselier, and O. L. Vaisberg: 2001, ‘High-latitude magnetic reconnection in sub-Alfvénic flow: Interball tail observations on May 29, 1996’. J. Geophys. Res. 106(15), 29491–29502.ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Bale, S. D., F. S. Mozer, and T. Phan: 2002, ‘Observation of lower hybrid drift instability in the diffusion region at a reconnecting magnetopause’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 2180, doi:10.1029/2002GL016113.ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer, T., G. Paschmann, N. Schopke, W. Baumjohann, R. Treumann, and T. Phan: 1998, ‘AMPTE/IRM observations of particles and fields at the dayside low-latitude magnetopause’. In: Geospace Mass and Energy Flow: Results From the International Solar-Terrestrial Physics Program, Vol. 104 of Geophysical Monograph Series. Washington, D. C., USA: American Geophysical Union, p. 51.Google Scholar
  7. Belmont, G., F. Reberac, and L. Rezeau: 1995, ‘Resonant amplification of magnetosheath MHD fluctuations at the magnetopause’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 295–298.ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Belmont, G. and L. Rezeau: 2001, ‘Magnetopause reconnection induced by magnetosheath Hall-MHD fluctuations’. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 10751–10760.ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Berchem, J. and C. T. Russell: 1984, ‘Flux transfer events on the magnetopause-Spatial distribution and controlling factors’. J. Geophys. Res. 89(18), 6689–6703.ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Birn, J., J. F. Drake, M. A. Shay, B. N. Rogers, R. E. Denton, M. Hesse, M. Kuznetsova, Z. W. Ma, A. Bhattacharjee, A. Otto, and P. L. Pritchett: 2001, ‘Geospace Environmental Modeling (GEM) magnetic reconnection challenge’. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 3715–3720.ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Bosqued, J. M., C. P. Escoubet, H. Frey, M. Dunlop, J. Berchem, A. Marchaudon, J. C. Cerisier, A. Fazerkerley, B. Lavraud, H. Rème, H. Laakso, and A. Balogh: 2004, ‘Multipoint observations of transient reconnection signatures in the dayside cusp precipitation: A CLUSTER-IMAGE detailed case study’. J. Geophys. Res. p. submitted.Google Scholar
  12. Bosqued, J. M., T. D. Phan, I. Dandouras, C. P. Escoubet, H. Rème, A. Balogh, M. W. Dunlop, D. Alcaydé, E. Amata, M. B. Bavassano-Cattaneo, R. Bruno, C. Carlson, A. M. DiLellis, L. Eliasson, V. Formisano, L. M. Kistler, B. Klecker, A. Korth, H. Kucharek, R. Lundin, M. McCarthy, J. P. McFadden, E. Moebius, G. K. Parks, and J.-A. Sauvaud: 2001, ‘CLUSTER observations of the high-latitude magnetopause and cusp: initial results from the CIS ion instruments’. Ann. Geophys. 19, 1545–1566.ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Carter, T. A., M. Yamada, H. Ji, R. M. Kulsrud, and F. Trintchouk: 2002, ‘Experimental study of lower-hybrid drift turbulence in a reconnecting current sheet’. Phys. Plasmas 9, 3272.ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Chisham, G., I. J. Coleman, M. P. Freeman, M. Pinnock, and M. Lester: 2002, ‘Ionospheric signatures of split reconnection X-lines during conditions of positive IMF Bz and By = Bz: Evidence for the antiparallel merging hypothesis’. J. Geophys. Res. 107(A10), 1323, doi:10.1029/2001JA009124.Google Scholar
  15. Constantinescu, O. D., K.-H. Glassmeier, R. Treumann, and K.-H. Fornac: 2003, ‘Magnetic mirror structures observed by Cluster in the magnetosheath’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1802, doi:10.1029/2003GL017313.ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Cowley, S. W. H.: 1982, ‘The causes of convection in the earth’s magnetosphere-A review of developments during the IMS’. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20, 531–565.ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Cowley, S. W. H. and C. J. Owen: 1989, ‘A simple illustrative model of open flux tube motion over the dayside magnetopause’. Planet. Space Sci. 37, 1461–1475.ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Crooker, N. U.: 1979, ‘Dayside merging and cusp geometry’. J. Geophys. Res. 84(13), 951–959.ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Davidson, R. C.: 1978, ‘Quasi-linear stabilization of lower-hybrid-drift instability’. Physics of Fluids 21, 1375–1380.zbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  20. De Keyser, J., M. W. Dunlop, C. J. Owen, B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, S. Haaland, A. Vaivads, R. Lundin, L. Rezeau, and G. Paschmann: 2005, ‘Magnetopause and Boundary Layer’. Space Sci. Rev. this issue.Google Scholar
  21. De Keyser, J., M. Roth, F. Reberac, L. Rezeau, and G. Belmont: 1999, ‘Resonant amplification of MHD waves in realistic subsolar magnetopause configurations’. J. Geophys. Res. 104(13), 2399–2410.ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Drake, J. F., J. Gerber, and R. G. Kleva: 1994, ‘Turbulence and transport in the magnetopause current layer’. J. Geophys. Res. 99(18), 11211–11224.ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunlop, M. W., A. Balogh, K.-H. Glassmeier, and P. Robert: 2002, ‘Four-point Cluster application of magnetic field analysis tools: The Curlometer’. J. Geophys. Res. 107(A11), 1384, doi:10.1029/2001JA005088.Google Scholar
  24. Escoubet, C. P., M. F. Smith, S. F. Fung, P. C. Anderson, R. A. Hoffman, E. M. Basinska, and J. M. Bosqued: 1992, ‘Staircase ion signature in the polar cusp-A case study’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 1735–1738.ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. Fairfield, D. H., A. Otto, T. Mukai, S. Kokubun, R. P. Lepping, J. T. Steinberg, A. J. Lazarus, and T. Yamamoto: 2000, ‘Geotail observations of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the equatorial magnetotail boundary for parallel northward fields’. J. Geophys. Res. 105(14), 21159–21174.ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. Farrell, W. M., M. D. Desch, M. L. Kaiser, and K. Goetz: 2002, ‘The dominance of electron plasma waves near a reconnection X-line region’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 1902Google Scholar
  27. Farrugia, C. J., P. E. Sandholt, W. F. Denig, and R. B. Torbert: 1998, ‘Observation of a correspondence between poleward moving auroral forms and stepped cusp ion precipitation’. J. Geophys. Res. 103(12), 9309–9316.ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Frey, H. U., T. D. Phan, S. A. Fuselier, and S. B. Mende: 2003, ‘Continuous magnetic reconnection at Earth’s magnetopause’. Nature 426, 533–537.ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. Fujimoto, M. and T. Terasawa: 1994, ‘Anomalous ion mixing within an MHD scale Kelvin-Helmholtz vortex’. J. Geophys. Res. 99(18), 8601–8613.ADSGoogle Scholar
  30. Fujimoto, M., T. Tonooka, and T. Mukai: 2003, ‘Vortex-like fluctuations in the magnetotail flanks and their possible roles in plasma transport’. In: P. T. Newell and T. Onsager (eds.): Earth’s Low-Latitude Boundary Layer, Vol. 133 of Geophysical Monograph Series. Washington, D. C., USA: American Geophysical Union, pp. 241–251.Google Scholar
  31. Fuselier, S. A., H. U. Frey, K. J. Trattner, S. B. Mende, and J. L. Burch: 2002, ‘Cusp aurora dependence on interplanetary magnetic field Bz’. J. Geophys. Res. 107(A7), 1111, doi:10.1029/2001JA900165.Google Scholar
  32. Fuselier, S. A., D. M. Klumpar, and E. G. Shelley: 1991, ‘Ion reflection and transmission during reconnection at the earth’s subsolar magnetopause’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 139–142.ADSGoogle Scholar
  33. Fuselier, S. A., S. M. Petrinec, and K. J. Trattner: 2000a, ‘Stability of the high-latitude reconnection site for steady northward IMF’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 473–476.ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. Fuselier, S. A., K. J. Trattner, and S. M. Petrinec: 2000b, ‘Cusp observations of high-and low-latitude reconnection for northward interplanetary magnetic field’. J. Geophys. Res. 105(14), 253–266.ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. Gonzalez, W. D. and F. S. Mozer: 1974, ‘A quantitative model for the potential resulting from reconnection with an arbitrary interplanetary magnetic field’. J. Geophys. Res. 79(18), 4186–4194.ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. Gosling, J. T., J. R. Asbridge, S. J. Bame, W. C. Feldman, G. Paschmann, N. Sckopke, and C. T. Russell: 1982, ‘Evidence for quasi-stationary reconnection at the dayside magnetopause’. J. Geophys. Res. 87(16), 2147–2158.ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. Gosling, J. T., M. F. Thomsen, S. J. Bame, R. C. Elphic, and C. T. Russell: 1990a, ‘Plasma flow reversals at the dayside magnetopause and the origin of asymmetric polar cap convection’. J. Geophys. Res. 95(14), 8073–8084.ADSGoogle Scholar
  38. Gosling, J. T., M. F. Thomsen, S. J. Bame, R. C. Elphic, and C. T. Russell: 1991, ‘Observations of reconnection of interplanetary and lobe magnetic field lines at the high-latitude magnetopause’. J. Geophys. Res. 96(15), 14097.ADSGoogle Scholar
  39. Gosling, J. T., M. F. Thomsen, S. J. Bame, T. G. Onsager, and C. T. Russell: 1990b, ‘The electron edge of the low latitude boundary layer during accelerated flow events’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 17, 1833–1836.ADSGoogle Scholar
  40. Greenwald, R. A., W. A. Bristow, G. J. Sofko, C. Senior, J.-C. Cerisier, and A. Szabo: 1995, ‘Super dual auroral radar network radar imaging of dayside high-latitude convection under northward interplanetary magnetic field: Toward resolving the distorted two-cell versus multicell controversy’. J. Geophys. Res. 100(9), 19661–19674.ADSGoogle Scholar
  41. Gurnett, D. A., R. R. Anderson, B. T. Tsurutani, E. J. Smith, G. Paschmann, G. Haerendel, S. J. Bame, and C. T. Russell: 1979, ‘Plasma wave turbulence at the magnetopause-Observations from ISEE 1 and 2’. J. Geophys. Res. 84(13), 7043–7058.ADSGoogle Scholar
  42. Gustafsson, G., A. M., T. Carozzi, A. I. Eriksson, C.-G. Fthammar, R. Grard, G. Holmgren, J. A. Holtet, N. Ivchenko, T. Karlsson, Y. Khotyaintsev, S. Klimov, H. Laakso, P.-A. Lindqvist, B. Lybekk, G. Marklund, F. Mozer, K. Mursula, A. Pedersen, B. Popielawska, S. Savin, K. Stasiewicz, P. Tanskanen, A. Vaivads, and J.-E. Wahlund: 2001, ‘First results of electric field and density observations by Cluster EFW based on initial months of operation’. Ann. Geophys. 19, 1219–1240.ADSGoogle Scholar
  43. Hasegawa, H., M. Fujimoto, T.-D. Phan, H. Rème, A. Balogh, M. W. Dunlop, C. Hashimoto, and R. TanDokoro: 2004, ‘Transport of solar wind into Earth’s magnetosphere through rolled-up Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices’. Nature 430, 755–758.ADSGoogle Scholar
  44. Hesse, M., J. Birn, and M. Kuznetsova: 2001, ‘Collisionless magnetic reconnection: Electron processes and transport modeling’. J. Geophys. Res. 106(15), 3721–3736.ADSGoogle Scholar
  45. Hones, E. W., S. J. Bame, J. R. Asbridge, J. Birn, G. Paschmann, N. Sckopke, and G. Haerendel: 1981, ‘Further determination of the characteristics of magnetospheric plasma vortices with Isee 1 and 2’. J. Geophys. Res. 86(15), 814–820.ADSGoogle Scholar
  46. Huba, J. D.: 1996, ‘The Kelvin-Helmholtz instability: Finite Larmor radius magnetohydrodynamics’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 2907–2910.ADSGoogle Scholar
  47. Hudson, P. D.: 1970, ‘Discontinuities in an anisotropic plasma and their identification in the solar wind’. Planet. Space Sci. 18, 1611–1622.ADSGoogle Scholar
  48. Johnson, J. R. and C. Z. Cheng: 1997, ‘Kinetic Alfvén waves and plasma transport at the magnetopause’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 1423–1426.ADSGoogle Scholar
  49. Kessel, R. L., S.-H. Chen, J. L. Green, S. F. Fung, S. A. Boardsen, L. C. Tan, T. E. Eastman, J. D. Craven, and L. A. Frank: 1996, ‘Evidence of high-latitude reconnecting during northward IMF: Hawkeye observations’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 583–586.ADSGoogle Scholar
  50. Khotyaintsev, Y., A. Vaivads, Y. Ogawa, B. Popielawska, M. André, S. Buchert, P. Décréeau, B. Lavraud, and H. Rème: 2004, ‘Cluster observations of high-frequency waves in the exterior cusp’. Ann. Geophys. 22, 2403–2411.ADSGoogle Scholar
  51. Kivelson, G. K. and S.-H. Chen: 1995, ‘The magnetopause: Surface waves and instabilities and their possible dynamical consequences’. In: P. Song, B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, and M. F. Thomsen (eds.): Physics of the Magnetopause, Vol. 90 of Geophysical Monograph Series. Washington, D. C., USA: American Geophysical Union, pp. 257–268.Google Scholar
  52. LaBelle, J. and R. A. Treumann: 1988, ‘Plasma waves at the dayside magnetopause’. Space Science Reviews 47, 175–202.ADSGoogle Scholar
  53. Lemaire, J.: 1977, ‘Impulsive penetration of filamentary plasma elements into the magnetospheres of the earth and Jupiter’. Planet. Space Sci. 25, 887–890.ADSGoogle Scholar
  54. Levy, R. H., H. E. Petschek, and G. L. Siscoe: 1964, ‘Aerodynamic aspects of the magnetospheric flow’. AIAA Journal 2, 2065.Google Scholar
  55. Lockwood, M., A. Fazakerley, H. J. Opgenoorth, J. Moen, A. P. van Eyken, M. Dunlop, J.-M. Bosqued, W. Denig, J. A. Wild, G. Lu, C. Cully, P. Eglitis, I. W. McCrea, M. A. Hapgood, M. N. Wild, R. R. Stamper, W. Denig, M. Taylor, J. A. Wild, G. Provan, O. Amm, K. Kauristie, T. Pulkkinen, A. Strømme, P. Prikryl, F. Pitout, A. Balogh, H. Rème, R. Behlke, T. Hansen, R. Greenwald, H. Frey, S. K. Morley, D. Alcaydé, P.-L. Blelly, E. Donovan, M. Engebretson, M. Lester, J. Watermann, and M. M.F.: 2001a, ‘Coordinated Cluster and ground-based instrument observations of transient changes in the magnetopause boundary layer during an interval of predominantly northward IMF: relation to reconnection pulses and FTE signatures’. Ann. Geophys. 19, 1613–1640.ADSGoogle Scholar
  56. Lockwood, M., B. S. Lanchester, H. U. Frey, K. Throp, S. K. Morley, S. E. Milan, and M. Lester: 2003, ‘IMF control of cusp proton emission intensity and dayside convection: implications for component and anti-parallel reconnection’. Ann. Geophys. 21, 955–982.ADSGoogle Scholar
  57. Lockwood, M., H. J. Opgenoorth, A. P. van Eyken, A. Fazakerley, J.-M. Bosqued, W. Denig, J. A. Wild, C. Cully, R. Greenwald, G. Lu, O. Amm, H. Frey, A. Strømme, P. Prikryl, M. A. Hapgood, M. N. Wild, R. Stamper, M. Taylor, I. McCrea, K. Kauristie, T. Pulkkinen, F. Pitout, A. Balogh, M. Dunlop, H. Rème, R. Behlke, T. Hansen, G. Provan, P. Eglitis, S. K. Morley, D. Alcaydé, P.-L. Blelly, J. Moen, E. Donovan, M. Engebretson, M. Lester, J. Watermann, and M. M. F.: 2001b, ‘Coordinated Cluster, ground-based instrumentation and low-altitude satellite observations of transient poleward-moving events in the ionosphere and in the tail lobe’. Ann. Geophys. 19, 1589–1612.ADSGoogle Scholar
  58. Lockwood, M. and M. F. Smith: 1992, ‘The variation of reconnection rate at the dayside magnetopause and cusp ion precipitation’. J. Geophys. Res. 97(16), 14841.ADSGoogle Scholar
  59. Luhmann, J. G., R. J. Walker, C. T. Russell, N. U. Crooker, J. R. Spreiter, and S. S. Stahara: 1984, ‘Patterns of potential magnetic field merging sites on the dayside magnetopause’. J. Geophys. Res. 89(18), 1741–1744.ADSGoogle Scholar
  60. Mandt, A., R. E. Denton, and J. F. Drake: 1994, ‘Transition to whistler mediated magnetic reconnection’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 73–76.ADSGoogle Scholar
  61. Marchaudon, A., J. Cerisier, J. Bosqued, M. Dunlop, J. Wild, P. Décréau, M. Förster, D. Fontaine, and H. Laakso: 2004, ‘Transient plasma injections in the dayside magnetosphere: one-to-one correlated observations by Cluster and SuperDARN’. Ann. Geophys. 22, 141–158.ADSGoogle Scholar
  62. Matsumoto, Y. and M. Hoshino: 2004, ‘Onset of turbulence induced by a Kelvin-Helmholtz vortex’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L02807, doi:10.1029/2003GL018195.Google Scholar
  63. Miura, A.: 1984, ‘Anomalous transport by magnetohydrodynamic Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities in the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction’. J. Geophys. Res. 89(18), 801–818.ADSGoogle Scholar
  64. Miura, A. and P. L. Pritchett: 1982, ‘Nonlocal stability analysis of the MHD Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in a compressible plasma’. J. Geophys. Res. 87(16), 7431–7444.ADSGoogle Scholar
  65. Moen, J., J. Holtet, A. Pedersen, B. Lybekk, K. Svenes, K. Oksavik, W. Denig, E. Lucek, F. Sraas, and A. M: 2001, ‘Cluster boundary layer measurements and optical observations at magnetically conjugate sites’. Ann. Geophys. 19, 1655.ADSGoogle Scholar
  66. Mozer, F. S., S. D. Bale, and T. D. Phan: 2002, ‘Evidence of Diffusion Regions at a Subsolar Magnetopause Crossing’. Physical Review Letters 89(1), 015002.ADSGoogle Scholar
  67. Mozer, F. S., S. D. Bale, T. D. Phan, and J. A. Osborne: 2003, ‘Observations of Electron Diffusion Regions at the Subsolar Magnetopause’. Physical Review Letters 91(24), 245002.ADSGoogle Scholar
  68. Nagai, T., I. Shinohara, M. Fujimoto, M. Hoshino, Y. Saito, S. Machida, and T. Mukai: 2001, ‘Geotail observations of the Hall current system: Evidence of magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail’. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 25929–25950.ADSGoogle Scholar
  69. Nakamura, T. K., D. Hayashi, M. Fujimoto, and I. Shinohara: 2004, ‘Decay of MHD-Scale Kelvin-Helmholtz Vortices Mediated by Parasitic Electron Dynamics’. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(14), 145001.ADSGoogle Scholar
  70. Newell, P. T. and C. Meng: 1991, ‘Ion acceleration at the equatorward edge of the cusp-Low altitude observations of patchy merging’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 1829–1832.ADSGoogle Scholar
  71. Nykyri, K. and A. Otto: 2001, ‘Plasma transport at the magnetospheric boundary due to reconnection in Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 3565–3568.ADSGoogle Scholar
  72. Ogilvie, K. W. and R. J. Fitzenreiter: 1989, ‘The Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the magnetopause and inner boundary layer surface’. J. Geophys. Res. 94(13), 15113–15123.ADSGoogle Scholar
  73. Øieroset, M., T. D. Phan, M. Fujimoto, R. P. Lin, and R. P. Lepping: 2001, ‘In situ detection of collisionless reconnection in the Earth’s magnetotail’. Nature 412, 414–417.ADSGoogle Scholar
  74. Onsager, T. G., C. A. Kletzing, J. B. Austin, and H. Mackiernan: 1993, ‘Model of magnetosheath plasma in the magnetosphere-Cusp and mantle particles at low-altitudes’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 479–482.ADSGoogle Scholar
  75. Owen, C. J., A. N. Fazakerley, P. J. Carter, A. J. Coates, I. C. Krauklis, S. Szita, M. G. G. T. Taylor, P. Travnicek, G. Watson, R. J. Wilson, A. Balogh, and M. W. Dunlop: 2001, ‘CLUSTER PEACE observations of electrons during magnetosheric flux transfer events’. Ann. Geophys. 19, 1509–1522.ADSGoogle Scholar
  76. Owen, C. J., M. G. G. T. Taylor, I. C. Krauklis, A. N. Fazakerley, M. W. Dunlop, and J. M. Bosqued: 2004, ‘Cluster observations of surface waves on the dawn flank magnetopause’. Ann. Geophys. 22, 971–983.ADSGoogle Scholar
  77. Paschmann, G., W. Baumjohann, N. Sckopke, I. Papamastorakis, and C. W. Carlson: 1986, ‘The magnetopause for large magnetic shear — AMPTE/IRM observations’. J. Geophys. Res. 91(10), 11099–11115.ADSGoogle Scholar
  78. Paschmann, G., S. Haaland, B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, E. Georgescu, B. Klecker, A. Vaivads, H. Rème, T. D. Phan, and H. Hasegawa: 2004, ‘Characteristics of the near-tail dawn magnetopause and boundary layer’. Ann. Geophys. submitted.Google Scholar
  79. Paschmann, G., I. Papamastorakis, N. Sckopke, G. Haerendel, B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, S. J. Bame, J. R. Asbridge, J. T. Gosling, C. T. Russel, and R. C. Elphic: 1979, ‘Plasma acceleration at the earth’s magnetopause-Evidence for reconnection’. Nature 282, 243–246.ADSGoogle Scholar
  80. Perraut, S., R. Gendrin, P. Robert, and A. Roux: 1979, ‘Magnetic pulsations observed on board GEOS-2 in the ULF range during multiple magnetopause crossings’. In: Alpbach Conf. Proc. ESA SP-148: Magnetospheric Boundary Layers,. pp. 113–122.Google Scholar
  81. Petrinec, S. M., K. J. Trattner, and S. A. Fuselier: 2003, ‘Steady reconnection during intervals of northward IMF: Implications for magnetosheath properties’. J. Geophys. Res. 108(A12), 1458, doi:10.1029/2003JA009979.Google Scholar
  82. Phan, T., H. U. Frey, S. Frey, L. Peticolas, S. Fuselier, C. Carlson, H. Rème, J.-M. Bosqued, A. Balogh, M. Dunlop, L. Kistler, C. Mouikis, I. Dandouras, J.-A. Sauvaud, S. Mende, J. Mc-Fadden, G. Parks, E. Moebius, B. Klecker, G. Paschmann, M. Fujimoto, S. Petrinec, M. F. Marcucci, A. Korth, and R. Lundin: 2003, ‘Simultaneous Cluster and IMAGE observations of cusp reconnection and auroral proton spot for northward IMF’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1509, doi:10.1029/2003GL016885.ADSGoogle Scholar
  83. Phan, T. D., M. W. Dunlop, G. Paschmann, B. Klecker, J. M. Bosqued, H. Rème, A. Balogh, C. Twitty, F. S. Mozer, C. W. Carlson, C. Mouikis, and L. M. Kistler: 2004, ‘Cluster observations of continuous reconnection at the magnetopause under steady interplanetary magnetic field conditions’. Ann. Geophys. 22, 2355–2367.ADSGoogle Scholar
  84. Phan, T.-D., G. Paschmann, W. Baumjohann, N. Sckopke, and H. Lühr: 1994, ‘The magnetosheath region adjacent to the dayside magnetopause: AMPTE/IRM observations’. J. Geophys. Res. 99(18), 121–141.ADSGoogle Scholar
  85. Phan, T.-D., G. Paschmann, and B. U. Ö. Sonnerup: 1996, ‘Low-latitude dayside magnetopause and boundary layer for high magnetic shear 2. Occurrence of magnetic reconnection’. J. Geophys. Res. 101(10), 7817–7828.ADSGoogle Scholar
  86. Phan, T. D., B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, and R. P. Lin: 2001, ‘Fluid and kinetics signatures of reconnection at the dawn tail magnetopause: Wind observations’. J. Geophys. Res. 106(15), 25489–25502.ADSGoogle Scholar
  87. Pitout, F., C. P. Escoubet, H. Rème, and A. Balogh: 2004, ‘Cluster survey of the mid-altitude cusp: morphology and plasma properties’. Ann. Geophys. Google Scholar
  88. Pritchett, P. L.: 2001, ‘Geospace Environment Modeling magnetic reconnection challenge: Simulations with a full particle electromagnetic code’. J. Geophys. Res. 106(15), 3783–3798.ADSGoogle Scholar
  89. Pritchett, P. L. and F. V. Coroniti: 2004, ‘Three-dimensional collisionless magnetic reconnection in the presence of a guide field’. J. Geophys. Res. 109, A01220, doi:10.1029/2003JA009999.Google Scholar
  90. Puhl-Quinn, P. A. and J. D. Scudder: 2000, ‘Systematics of ion Walén analysis of rotational discontinuities using E/Z measurements’. J. Geophys. Res 105(14), 7617–7628.ADSGoogle Scholar
  91. Retino, A., M. B. Bavassano-Cattaneo, M. F. Marcucci, A. Vaivads, M. Andre, Y. Khotyaintsev, T. Phan, G. Pallocchia, H. Rème, E. Moebius, B. Klecker, C. Carlson, M. McCarthy, A. Korth, R. Lundin, and A. Balogh: 2004, ‘Cluster multispacecraft observations at the high latitude duskside magnetopause: implications for continuous and component magnetic reconnection’. Ann. Geophys. p. in press.Google Scholar
  92. Rezeau, L. and G. Belmont: 2001, ‘Magnetic turbulence at the magnetopause, a key problem for understanding the solar wind/ magnetosphere exchanges’. Space Science Reviews 95, 427–441.ADSGoogle Scholar
  93. Rezeau, L., G. Belmont, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, F. Reberac, and C. Briand: 1999, ‘Spectral law and polarization properties of the low-frequency waves at the magnetopause’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 651–654.ADSGoogle Scholar
  94. Rogers, B. N., R. E. Denton, and J. F. Drake: 2003, ‘Signatures of collisionless magnetic reconnection’. J. Geophys. Res. 108(A3), 1111, doi:10.1029/2002JA009699.Google Scholar
  95. Rogers, B. N., R. E. Denton, J. F. Drake, and M. A. Shay: 2001, ‘Role of Dispersive Waves in Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection’. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(19), 195004;doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.195004.ADSGoogle Scholar
  96. Runov, A., R. Nakamura, W. Baumjohann, R. A. Treumann, T. L. Zhang, M. Volwerk, Z. Vörös, A. Balogh, K.-H. Glassmeier, B. Klecker, H. Rème, and L. Kistler: 2003, ‘Current sheet structure near magnetic X-line observed by Cluster’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1579, doi:10.1029/2002GL016730.ADSGoogle Scholar
  97. Russell, C. T. and R. C. Elphic: 1978, ‘Initial ISEE magnetometer results-Magnetopause observations’. Space Sci. Rev. 22, 681–715.ADSGoogle Scholar
  98. Sagdeev, R. Z.: 1979, ‘The 1976 Oppenheimer lectures: Critical problems in plasma astrophysics. II. Singular layers and reconnection’. Reviews of Modern Physics 51, 11–20.ADSGoogle Scholar
  99. Sahraoui, F., J. L. Pinçon, G. Belmont, L. Rezeau, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, P. Robert, L. Mellul, J. M. Bosqued, A. Balogh, P. Canu, and G. Chanteur: 2003, ‘ULF wave identification in the magnetosheath: The k-filtering technique applied to Cluster II data’. J. Geophys. Res. 108(A9), 1335, doi:10.1029/2002JA009587.Google Scholar
  100. Scholer, M., I. Sidorenko, C. H. Jaroschek, R. A. Treumann, and A. Zeiler: 2003, ‘Onset of collisionless magnetic reconnection in thin current sheets: Three-dimensional particle simulations’. Physics of Plasmas 10, 3521.ADSGoogle Scholar
  101. Scholer, M. and R. A. Treumann: 1997, ‘The Low-Latitude Boundary Layer at the Flanks of the Magnetopause’. Space Sci. Rev. 80, 341–367.ADSGoogle Scholar
  102. Sckopke, N., G. Paschmann, G. Haerendel, B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, S. J. Bame, T. G. Forbes, E. W. Hones, and C. T. Russell: 1981, ‘Structure of the low-latitude boundary layer’. J. Geophys. Res. 86, 2099–2110.ADSGoogle Scholar
  103. Scudder, J. D., F. S. Mozer, N. C. Maynard, and C. T. Russell: 2002, ‘Fingerprints of collisionless reconnection at the separator, I, Ambipolar-Hall signatures’. J. Geophys. Res. 107(A10), 1294, doi:10.1029/2001JA000126.Google Scholar
  104. Scudder, J. D., P. A. Puhl-Quinn, F. S. Mozer, K. W. Ogilvie, and C. T. Russell: 1999, ‘Generalized Walén tests through Alfvén waves and rotational discontinuities using electron flow velocities’. J. Geophys. Res. 104(13), 19817–19834.ADSGoogle Scholar
  105. Scurry, L., C. T. Russell, and J. T. Gosling: 1994, ‘A statistical study of accelerated flow events at the dayside magnetopause’. J. Geophys. Res. 99(18), 14815.ADSGoogle Scholar
  106. Shay, M. A., J. F. Drake, B. N. Rogers, and R. E. Denton: 2001, ‘Alfvénic collisionless magnetic reconnection and the Hall term’. J. Geophys. Res. 99(15), 3759–3772.ADSGoogle Scholar
  107. Shinohara, I., H. Suzuki, M. Fujimoto, and M. Hoshino: 2001, ‘Rapid Large-Scale Magnetic-Field Dissipation in a Collisionless Current Sheet via Coupling between Kelvin-Helmholtz and Lower-Hybrid Drift Instabilities’. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(9), 095001.ADSGoogle Scholar
  108. Sibeck, D. G., G. Paschmann, R. A. Treumann, S. A. Fuselier, W. Lennartsson, M. Lockwood, R. Lundin, K. W. Ogilvie, T. G. Onsager, T.-D. Phan, M. Roth, M. Scholer, N. Sckopke, K. Stasiewicz, and M. Yamauchi: 1999, ‘Plasma Transfer Processes at the Magnetopause’. Space Sci. Rev. 88, 207–283.ADSGoogle Scholar
  109. Smith, M. F. and D. J. Rodgers: 1991, ‘Ion distributions at the dayside magnetopause’. J. Geophys. Res. 96(15), 11617.ADSGoogle Scholar
  110. Song, P. and C. T. Russell: 1992, ‘Model of the formation of the low-latitude boundary layer for strongly northward interplanetary magnetic field’. J. Geophys. Res. 97(16), 1411–1420.ADSGoogle Scholar
  111. Sonnerup, B. U. Ö.: 1974, ‘Magnetopause reconnection rate’. J. Geophys. Res. 79, 1546.ADSGoogle Scholar
  112. Sonnerup, B. U. Ö.: 1979, ‘Magnetic field reconnection’. In: Solar system plasma physics. Volume 3. (A79-53667 24-46) Amsterdam, North-Holland Publishing Co., 1979, pp. 45–108.Google Scholar
  113. Sonnerup, B. U. Ö., H. Hasegawa, and G. Paschmann: 2004, ‘Anatomy of a flux transfer event seen by Cluster’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, 11803, doi:10.1029/2004GL0201343.ADSGoogle Scholar
  114. Sonnerup, B. U. Ö., I. Papamastorakis, G. Paschmann, and H. Lühr: 1987, ‘Magnetopause properties from AMPTE/IRM observations of the convection electric field-Method development’. J. Geophys. Res. 92(11), 12137–12159.ADSGoogle Scholar
  115. Sonnerup, B. U. Ö., I. Papamastorakis, G. Paschmann, and H. Lühr: 1990, ‘The magnetopause for large magnetic shear-Analysis of convection electric fields from AMPTE/IRM’. J. Geophys. Res. 95(14), 10541–10557.ADSGoogle Scholar
  116. Sonnerup, B. U. Ö., G. Paschmann, I. Papamastorakis, N. Sckopke, G. Haerendel, S. J. Bame, J. R. Asbridge, J. T. Gosling, and C. T. Russell: 1981, ‘Evidence for magnetic field reconnection at the earth’s magnetopause’. J. Geophys. Res. 86(15), 10049–10067.ADSGoogle Scholar
  117. Terasawa, T.: 1983, ‘Hall current effect on tearing mode instability’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 10, 475–478.ADSGoogle Scholar
  118. Thomas, V. A. and D. Winske: 1993, ‘Kinetic simulations of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the magnetopause’. J. Geophys. Res. 98(17), 11425.ADSGoogle Scholar
  119. Trattner, K. J., S. A. Fuselier, W. K. Peterson, M. Boehm, D. Klumpar, C. W. Carlson, and T. K. Yeoman: 2002, ‘Temporal versus spatial interpretation of cusp ion structures observed by two spacecraft’. J. Geophys. Res. 107(A10), 1287, doi:10.1029/2001JA000181.Google Scholar
  120. Trattner, K. J., S. A. Fuselier, and S. M. Petrinec: 2004, ‘Location of the reconnection line for northward interplanetary magnetic field’. J. Geophys. Res. 109(A18), A03219, doi:10.1029/2003JA009975.Google Scholar
  121. Trattner, K. J., S. A. Fuselier, T. Yeoman, C. Carlson, W. Peterson, A. Korth, H. Rème, J. Sauvaud, and N. Dubouloz: 2005, ‘Spatial and Temporal Cusp Structures Observed by Multiple Spacecraft and Ground Based Observations’. Surveys in Geophysics. submitted.Google Scholar
  122. Trattner, K. J., S. A. Fuselier, T. K. Yeoman, A. Korth, M. Fraenz, C. Mouikis, H. Kucharek, L. M. Kistler, C. P. Escoubet, H. Rème, I. Dandouras, J. A. Sauvaud, J. M. Bosqued, B. Klecker, C. Carlson, T. Phan, J. P. McFadden, E. Amata, and L. Eliasson: 2003, ‘Cusp structures: combining multi-spacecraft observations with ground-based observations’. Ann. Geophys. 21, 2031–2041.ADSGoogle Scholar
  123. Treumann, R. A. and W. Baumjohann: 1997, Advanced space plasma physics. London: Imperial College Press, 1997.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  124. Treumann, R. A., C. H. Jaroschek, K. Hallatschek, O. A. Pokhotelov, W. Baumjohann, and E. Georgescu: 2004, ‘The strange physics of low frequency mirror mode turbulence in the high temperature plasma of the magnetosheath’. Nonlin. Proc. Geophys. 11, in press.Google Scholar
  125. Treumann, R. A. and N. Sckopke: 1999, ‘Diffusion Processes’. Space Sci. Rev. 88, 389–402.ADSGoogle Scholar
  126. Tsurutani, B. T. and R. M. Thorne: 1982, ‘Diffusion processes in the magnetopause boundary layer’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 9, 1247–1250.ADSGoogle Scholar
  127. Twitty, C., T. Phan, G. Paschmann, B. Lavraud, H. Rème, and M. Dunlop: 2004, ‘Cluster survey of cusp reconnection and its IMF dependence’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L19808, doi:10.1029/2004GL020646.ADSGoogle Scholar
  128. Vaivads, A., M. André, S. Buchert, J.-E. Wahlund, A. Fazakerley, and N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin: 2004, ‘Cluster observations of lower hybrid turbulence within thin layers at the magnetopause’. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L03804, doi:10.1029/2003GL018142.Google Scholar
  129. Vaivads, A., Y. Khotyaintsev, M. André, A. Retinò, S. C. Buchert, B. N. Rogers, P. Décréau, G. Paschmann, and T. D. Phan: 2004, ‘Structure of the Magnetic Reconnection Diffusion Region from Four-Spacecraft Observations’. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(10), 105001.ADSGoogle Scholar
  130. Vontrat-Reberac, A., J. M. Bosqued, M. G. G. T. Taylor, B. Lavraud, D. Fontaine, M. W. Dunlop, H. Laakso, N. Cornilleau-Werhlin, P. Canu, and A. Fazakerley: 2003, ‘Cluster observations of the high-altitude cusp for northward interplanetary magnetic field: A case study’. J. Geophys. Res. 108(A9), 1346, doi:10.1029/2002JA009717.Google Scholar
  131. Wild, J. A., S.W. H. Cowley, J. A. Davies, H. Khan, S. E. Milan, G. Provan, T. K. Yeoman, A. Balogh, M. W. Dunlop, K.-H. Fornacon, and E. Georgescu: 2001, ‘First simultaneous observations of flux transfer events at the high-latitude magnetopause by the Cluster spacecraft and pulsed radar signatures in the conjugate ionosphere by the CUTLASS and EISCAT radars’. Ann. Geophys. 19, 1491–1508.ADSGoogle Scholar
  132. Zwan, B. J. and R. A. Wolf: 1976, ‘Depletion of solar wind plasma near a planetary boundary’. J. Geophys. Res. 81(10), 1636–1648.ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. D. Phan
    • 1
  • C. P. Escoubet
    • 2
  • L. Rezeau
    • 3
  • R. A. Treumann
    • 4
  • A. Vaivads
    • 5
  • G. Paschmann
    • 6
  • S. A. Fuselier
    • 7
  • D. Attié
    • 8
  • B. Rogers
    • 9
  • B. U. Ö. Sonnerup
    • 10
  1. 1.Space Sciences LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.ESTECNoordwijkThe Netherlands
  3. 3.CETP/IPSL/UPMCVélizyFrance
  4. 4.Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische PhysikGarchingGermany
  5. 5.Swedish Institute of Space PhysicsUppsalaSweden
  6. 6.International Space Science InstituteBernSwitzerland
  7. 7.Lockheed-Martin Advanced Techn. CenterPalo AltoUSA
  8. 8.CETP/IPSLVélizyFrance
  9. 9.Physics DepartmentDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA
  10. 10.Thayer School of EngineeringDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA

Personalised recommendations