Skip to main content

METHODS AND TOOLS IN ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT WORKING GROUP SUMMARY

  • Conference paper
Ecotoxicology, Ecological Risk Assessment and Multiple Stressors

Abstract

A working group discussed Methods and Tools in Ecotoxicology and Ecological Risk Assessment Related to Acceptable Risk for Critical and Non-critical Infrastructure. At the beginning of a discussion on issues of ecotoxicology, the working group recognized that, environmental toxicology has been and continues to be an important discipline. Ecological toxicology is required for predicting real world effects and ecology have shown similar developmental patterns over time. Closer cooperation between ecologists and toxicologists would benefit both disciplines. Two additional issues were discussed at the Working Group meting:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Calow P.,Ecology in ecotoxicology:Some possible ‘rules of thumb’. In: baird D.J, Maltby L.,Greig-Smith P.W., Douben P.E.T. Editors, Ecotoxicology:Ecological Dimensions, Chapman and Hall, London 1996: 58.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chapman P.M. 2000a.Poor design of behavioural experiments gets poor results:Examples from intertidal habitats. J.Exp.Mar.Biol.Ecol. 250: 77-95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chapman P.M. 2000b. Whole effluent toxicity (WET) testing usefulness,level of protection and risk assessment. Environ.Toxicol.Chem.19: 38.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chapman P.M. 2002.Integrating toxicology and ecology:putting the “eco”into ecotoxicology.Marine Pollution Bulletin V 44,issue 1: 7-15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Decaprio A.P 1997.Biomarkers:Coming of age for environmental health and risk assessment Environ.Sci.Technol. 31: 1837-1848.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Duarte C.M. 2000 Marine biodiversity and ecosystem services: An elusive link.J.Exp.Mar.Biol.Ecol .250; 117-131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goncharova N. Role of Synergy in Biological Risk Assessment Morel, B. and Linkov, I (eds). Environmental Security and Environmental Management:The Role of Risk Assessment. Springer, 2005: 197-208 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hertzberg R.C., MacDonell M.M.Synergy and other ineffective mixture risk.definitions The Science of The Total Environment 2002,V288, issue.1-2: 31-42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kapustka L.A., Landis W.G.1998.Ecology:the science versus the myth. Human and Ecol Risk Assessment 4: 829-838.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vigerstad T and McCarty L.S., The ecosystem paradigm and environmental risk management. Human Environ.Risk Assess.2002, 6: 369-38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

KAPUSTKA, L.A., GONCHAROVA, N.V., ARAPIS, G.D. (2006). METHODS AND TOOLS IN ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT WORKING GROUP SUMMARY. In: Arapis, G., Goncharova, N., Baveye, P. (eds) Ecotoxicology, Ecological Risk Assessment and Multiple Stressors. NATO Security Through Science Series, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4476-3_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics