Skip to main content

PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT AGAINST IONISING RADIATION: THE PATH PROPOSED BY “ICRP”, ITS ORIGINS AND ANALYSIS

  • Conference paper
Ecotoxicology, Ecological Risk Assessment and Multiple Stressors

Part of the book series: NATO Security Through Science Series ((NASTC,volume 6))

Abstract

Stimulated by the apparition of large-scale environmental problems, the protection of the environment is becoming increasingly prominent within current concerns of human societies. Industrial and economical activities are experiencing detrimental impacts, which sometimes only become apparent after some delay, making it difficult or illusory to set corrective measures. Hence, a better capacity for anticipation needs to be targeted with a concomitant emphasis on regulation efforts to promote “sustainable development”, where there is a balance achieved between technological innovation and the potential for mastering the associated environmental risk.Since 2000, the ICRP has therefore worked at constructing a general framework for the radiological protection of non-human biota which is currently based on 4 main elements: 1) an approach channelled through the definition of “reference organisms” to circumvent the difficulty of tackling the overall biodiversity of life forms, and the variety of their life spans, habitats, and metabolisms, 2) units and reference dosimetry models scaled to these reference organisms to be able to estimate radiation doses received by various biota, 3) a set of endpoints that would both ensure fulfilling the protection goals, and be accessible to quantification, and 4) a scale of risk based on the best interpretation of the information available on dose-effects relationships at the level of individuals. These concepts will be reviewed and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bréchignac F. (2001) Impact of radioactivity on the environment: Problems, state of current knowledge, and approaches for identification of radioprotection criteria. Radioprotection, 36(4); 511-535.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bréchignac F. (2003) Protection of the environment : how to position radioprotection in an ecological risk assessment perspective. The Science of the Total Environment, 307; 37-54.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bréchignac F., Barescut J.-C. (2003) From human to environmental radioprotection : some crucial issues worth considering. In Protection of the Environment from Ionising Radiation - The development and application of a system of protection of the environment, IAEA-CSP-17, Vienna, Austria, 119-128.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brundtland Report (1987) Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  5. CNSC. (2001) Releases of radionuclides from nuclear facilities. Impact on non-human biota. Priority substances list assessment report, 107 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Copplestone D., Bielby S., Jones S.R., Patton D., Daniel P., Gize I. (2001) Impact assessment of ionizing radiation on wildlife. R&D Publication 128, UK Environment Agency, Bristol, 222 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Highley K.A., Domotor S.L., Antonio E.J., Kocher D.C. (2002) Derivation of a screening methodology for evaluating radiation dose to aquatic and terrestrial biota. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 66(1-2); 41-60.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holm L.-E. (2003) Radiological protection of the environment. In Protection of the Environment from Ionising Radiation - The development and application of a system of protection of the environment, IAEA-CSP-17, Vienna, Austria, 103-109.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ICRP (2001) A report on progress towards new recommendations: a communication from the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Journal of Radiological Protection, 21; 113-123.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ICRP (2003) Protection of Non-human Species from Ionising Radiation. Proposal for a Framework for the assessment of ionising radiation in the environment. Task Group Draft Report, ICRP 02/305/02.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ICRP 1977. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiation Protection. Publication 26, Annals of ICRP 1 (3), Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ICRP (1991). Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiation Protection. Publication 60, Annals of the ICRP 21 (1-3), Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kocher D.C., Trabalka J.R. (2000) On the application of a radiation weighting factor for alpha particles in protection of non-human biota. Health Physics, 79(4); 407-411.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pentreath R.J, Woodhead D.S. (2001) A system for protecting the environment from ionising radiation: selecting reference fauna and flora, and the possible dose models and environmental geometries that could be applied on them. The Science of the Total Environment, 277; 33-43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pentreath R.J. (1998) Radiological protection criteria for the natural environment. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 75; 175-179.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pentreath R.J. (1999) A system for radiological protection of the environment: some initial thoughts and ideas. Journal of Radiological Protection, 19; 117-128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pentreath R.J. (2002) Radiation protection of people and the environment: developing a common approach. Journal of Radiological Protection, 22(1); 45-56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sazykina T.G., Kryshev I.I. (2002) Methodology for radioecological assessment of radionuclides permissible levels in the seas - Protection of human and marine biota. In: The radioecology and ecotoxicology of continental and estuarine environments, F. Bréchignac, ed., Radioprotection Colloques, EDP Sciences, Paris, Vol. 37 C1; 899-902.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson P.A., MacDonald C.R., Harrison F. (2003) Recommended RBE weighting factor for the ecological risk assessment of alpha-emitting radionuclides. In Protection of the Environment from Ionising Radiation - The development and application of a system of protection of the environment, IAEA-CSP-17, Vienna, Austria, 93-102.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson P.M. (1988) Environmental monitoring for radionuclides in marine ecosystems: are species other than man protected adequately? Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 7; 275-283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Trivedi A., Gentner N.E. (2002) Ecodosimetry weighting factor (eR) for non-human biota. 10th International Congress IRPA 14-19 May 2000, Hiroshima, Japan, P-2a-114, pp. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. UNCED (1992). Agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, UNCED, June 3-14, 1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  23. UNSCEAR (1996) Effects of radiation on the environment. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Report to the General Assembly, Annex 1, United Nations, New York, 86 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  24. US DOE Standard (2000) A graded approach for evaluating radiation doses to aquatic and terrestrial biota. US Department of Energy, Washington DC 20585. DOE-STDXXXX-00 Proposed.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Woodhead D.S. (2003) A possible approach for the assessment of radiation effects on populations of wild organisms in radionuclide-contaminated environments. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 66; 181-213.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

BRECHIGNAC, F. (2006). PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT AGAINST IONISING RADIATION: THE PATH PROPOSED BY “ICRP”, ITS ORIGINS AND ANALYSIS. In: Arapis, G., Goncharova, N., Baveye, P. (eds) Ecotoxicology, Ecological Risk Assessment and Multiple Stressors. NATO Security Through Science Series, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4476-3_03

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics