Skip to main content

Enter the Poor: American Welfare Reform, Solidarity and the Capability of Human Flourishing

  • Chapter
  • 904 Accesses

Part of the book series: Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy ((LOET,volume 19))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berger, P. L. and R. J. Neuhaus. (1977), To Empower People: The Role of Mediating Structures in Public Policy, Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Briffault, R. (1996), “The Local Government Boundary Problem in Metropolitan Areas.” Stanford Law Review 48: 1115-1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, V. (2002), Welfare Reform: An Issue Overview, Cong. Research Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashin, S. (2000), “Localism, Self-Interest, and the Tyranny of the Favored Quarter: Addressing the Barriers to New Regionalism.” Geogetown Law Journal 88: 1985-2048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooms, L. A. (1995), “Don’t Believe the Hype: Black Women, Patriarchy and the New Welfarism”, Howard Law Journal 38: 611-628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalaker, J. (2001). Poverty in the United States: 2000, United States Department of Commerce

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorr, D. (1992), Option for the Poor: One Hundred Years of Vatican Social Teaching, Dublin: Gill and Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Elders, L. J. (1998), “Common Good as Goal and Governing Principle of Social Life: Interpretations and Meaning”, in D. A. Boileau, Principles of Catholic Social Thought, Milwaukee: Marquette University Press. 103-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. J. (1995), The War Against the Poor: The Underclass and Antipovery Policy, New York: BasicBooks

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. L. A. (1997), “Liberal Theory, Human Freedom, and the Politics of Sexual Morality”, in P. J. Weithman, ed., Religion and Contemporary Liberalism, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 218-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilens, M. (1999), Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Anti-Poverty Policy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, M. A. (1991), Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse, New York: Free Press Gray, J. (1998), False Dawn: The Delusions of Global Capitalism, London: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, D. L. (1998), “Catholic Labor Theory and the Transformation of Work.” Washington and Lee Law Review 45: 119-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handler, J. F. and Y. Hasenfeld. (1997), We the Poor People: Work, Poverty, & Welfare, New Haven: Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. (2003), Flat Broke with Children: Women in the Age of Welfare Reform, New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, Dr. E. M. and J. Kelly. (2002), For Better or For Worse: Divorce Reconsidered, New York: Norton

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, H. (2001), “The Politics of Welfare Reform”, in Rebecca M. Blank and Ron Haskins, eds, The New World of Welfare. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. 169-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, N. (2005), Job Market Gives Hint of Recovery, The Washington Post, Feb. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himes, K. R. (1997), “Rights of Entitlement: A Roman Catholic Perspective”, Notre Dame Journal of Law Ethics and Public Policy 11: 507-529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbach, S. J. D. (2002), The Common Good and Christian Ethics, New York: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. L. (1996), “Provisions of Welfare Bill”, 54 Cong. Q. Wkly. Rep. Aug. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemann, N. (1991), The Promised Land: The Great Black Migration and How it Changed America, New York: Vintage

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, L. M. (1986), Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligations of Citizenship, New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • _____ (1997), The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty, Washington D.C.: Brookings Institute Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. A. (1984), Losing Ground: American Social Policy 1950-1980, New York: BasicBooks

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, M. (1991), The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism, 2nd. ed., New York: Simon and Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. and A. Sen. (1993), “Introduction”, in M. C. Nussbaum and A. Sen, eds, The Quality of Life, New York: Oxford University Press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, B. (2003), Moralism, Paternalism and Conservatism: A new American approach to the poor? Mimeograph, Von Hügel Institute, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, W. (1993), “Poverty in the United States”, in T. H. Sanks and G. Coleman, eds, Reading the Signs of the Times: Resources for Social and Cultural Analysis, New York: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J. T. (1986), America’s Struggle Against Poverty 1900-1985, Cambridge: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope John Paul II. (1992), “Sollicitudo rei socialis”, in D. J. O’Brien and T. J. Shannon, eds, Catholic Social Thought: The Documentary Heritage., Maryknoll: Orbis Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Touchstone

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, W. P. (1996), “Five Hundred Years of English Poor Laws, 1349-1834: Regulating the Working and Non-Working Poor”, Akron Law Review 30: 73-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (2000), The Just, Trans. D. Pellauer, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • ______ (1992), Oneself as Another, Trans. K. Blamey, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, L. (1998), “The Human Person and Human Dignity as Basis of the Social Doctrine of the Church”, in D. A. Boileau, ed., Principles of Catholic Social Teaching, Milwaukee: Marquette University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Dr. J. S. (2000), The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce: a 25 Year Landmark Study, New York: Hyperion

    Google Scholar 

  • Wax, A. L. (2000), “The Constitution Under Clinton: A Critical Assessment: Rethinking Welfare Rights: Reciprocity Norms, Reactive Attitudes and the Political Economy of Welfare Reform”, Law and Contemporary Problems 63: 257-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • White House, Working Toward Independence (2002), available athttp://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/02/welfare-reform-announcement-book.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rougeau, V.D. (2006). Enter the Poor: American Welfare Reform, Solidarity and the Capability of Human Flourishing. In: Deneulin, S., Nebel, M., Sagovsky, N. (eds) Transforming Unjust Structures The Capability Approach. Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4432-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics