Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Transformation of Landscape Ecology and Restoration Ecology into Transdisciplinary Sciences of Holistic Landscape Study, Management and Planning, Conservation and Restoration

  • Chapter
Transdisciplinary Challenges in Landscape Ecology and Restoration Ecology

Part of the book series: Landscape Series ((LAEC,volume 6))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Schulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, and Craig Z (2003). Integrating humans into ecology: Opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bio-Science 53, 1169–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen TFH, and Hoekstra TW (1992) Toward a Unified Ecology. Columbia University Press. New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antrop M (2000) Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 77: 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antrop M, and Van Eetveld V (2000) Holistic aspects of suburban landscapes: visual image interpretation and landscape metrics. Special issue, Landscape Ecology 50: 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett GW (2001) Closing the ecological cycle: the emergence of integrative science. Ecosystem Health 7: 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian O, and Schreiber K-F (1994) Analyse und oekologische Bewertung der Landschaft. Gustav Fischer Verlag Jena, Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian O, and Steinhardt U (eds) (2002) Development and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology. Conceptions, Methods, Application. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dodrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudry J, Burel F, Thenaile C, and LeCoeur D (2000) A holistic landscape ecological study of the interactions between farming activities and ecological patterns in Brittany, France. Special issue, Landscape and Urban Planning 50: 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm D (1985) Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Ark Paperbacks, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm D (1996) On Dialogue. Nichol L (ed.) Routledge. New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm D, and Peat DF (1987) Science, Order, and Creativity. A Dramatic Look at the Roots of Science and Life. Bantam Books. New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollinger J, Lischke H, and Green DG (2005) Simulating the spatial and temporal dynamics of landscapes using generic and complex models. (Introduction to special Issue) Ecological Complexity 2: 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt J (1998) Key concepts and interdisciplinarity in landscape ecology: A summing-up and outlook. In: Dover JW, and Bunce RGH (eds) Key Concepts in Landscape Ecology. IALE(UK). Garstang, pp 421–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt J, and Agger P (1984) Methodology in Landscape Ecological Research and Planning. First International Seminar of IALE, Roskilde University Centre, October 1984. Roskilde Universitaetsforlag, Roskilde, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw AD, and Chadwick MJ (1980). The Restoration of Land. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuste JH (1998) Preface. In: Breuste J, Feldmann H, and Uhlmann O (eds) 1998. Urban Ecology. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany, pp V–VII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright C (2000) Anticipating environmental surprises. In: Brown LR, Flavin HF, and French H (eds) State of the World 2000. A Worldwatch Institute Report on Progress Toward a Sustainable Society. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, London, U.K, pp 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LR (2001a) Eco-Economy: Building an Economy for the Earth. W.W. Norton & Co, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LR (2001b) Dust Bowl Threatening Chinas Future. The Earth Policy Alerts. [online] htpp:// www. earth policy.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LR (2003) World Creating Food Bubble Economy Based on Unsustainable Use of Water. Earth-Economy Update 2003–2.[online] htpp://www.earth-policy.org/Updates22.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LR (2003) Plan B: Rescuing a Planet under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble. W. W. Norton & Co. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LR (2006) Plan B 2.0: Rescuing a Planet under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble. W. W. Norton & Co. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahalan W (1995). Ecological groundedness in Gestalt theory. In: Roszak T, Gomes M, and Kanner A (eds) Ecopsychology Restoring the Earth healing the Mind, Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, USA, pp 21–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra F (2002) The Hidden Connections. Integrating the Biological, Cognitive, and Social Dimensions of Life into a Science of Sustainability. Doubleday, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmel Y, and Naveh Z (2002) The paradigm of landscape and the paradigm of ecosystems – implications for land planning and management in the Mediterranean Region. Journal of Mediterranean Ecology 3: 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R (1996) Ecological economics: reintegrating the study of humans and nature. Ecological Applications 6: 987–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, and Daly HE (1992) Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology 6: 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau P (1957) Biogeography: An Ecological perspective. Ronald Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot RS (1992) Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision Making. Wolters Noordhoff BV, Groningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Noy-van Tol, J. 2003. Needs for training of Professionals. In: Tress; B., Tress, G., van der Valk, A. and G. Fry, editors. 2003. Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary landscape studies: Potentials and Limitations. Delta Series 2, Wageningen 2003, The Netherlands. pp 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Castri F (1997) Editorial: Landscape in a changing globalized environment. Landscape Ecology 12: 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egler FE (1942) Vegetation as an object of study. Philosophical Science, 9, 245–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egler FE (1964) Pesticides in our ecosystem. American Scientist, 52: 110–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egler FE 1970. The Way of Science. A philosophy for the Layman. Hafner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR (2002) Human natures, nature conservation, and environmental ethics. BioScience 52: 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earth Policy News (2003) [online]htpp://www.earth-policy.org/Updates/Update 23.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • EU-Project MOSES (2000) Modeling Sustainable Regional Development in the European Information Society. Final report ENV4-CT97–2600-PL97–0543 for the EU Program, Environment and Climate, 1994–1998 Area 4: Human Dimensions of Environmental Change. UFZ Leipzig-Halle, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina A, and Naveh Z (eds) (1993) A Landscape approach to regional planning: The future of Mediterranean landscapes. Special Issue: Landscape and Urban Planning, 24: 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina A (1998) Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology. Chapman & Hall, London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski M, and Haberl H (1998) Sustainable development, long term changes in socio-economic metabolism, and colonization of nature. International Social Science Journal 156: 573–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischlowitz –Roberts B (2002) Green Power Purchases growing by Leaps and Bounds. Eco-Economy Update 2002–4 [online] htp://www.earth-policy.org/Updates/Update9.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavin C (2001) Rich Planet, Poor Planet. In: Starke L (ed.) State of the World 2001. Norton & Company, New York, pp 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land Mosaics. The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner G (2002) The challenge for Johannesburg: Creating a more secure world. In: L. Starke (ed.) State of the World 2002. Norton & Company, New York, London, U.K., pp 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ, and Eldrege N (1983) Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, and Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy. Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press, Washington DC, Covelo California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson EJ (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial patterns: What is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1: 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green DG, and Sadedin S (2005) Interactions matter-complexity in landscapes and ecosystems. Ecological Complexity 2: 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann WD (2000) Realizing sustainable development in the information society. Landscape and Urban Planning 50: 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann WD, and Naveh Z (2000) Transdisciplinary challenges for regional sustainable development towards the post–industrial information Society. Proceedings International Congress European Ecological Economy Society Vienna 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green B, and Vos W (2001) Threatened Landscapes Conserving Cultural Environments. Spon Press, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas L (2002) New energy from the power of the wind. Deutschland 6: 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken, H. 1983. Synergetics, 3rd edn, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassett B, Palmer M, Berhardt E, Smith S, Carr J, and Hart D (2005) Restoring watersheds project: trends in Chesapeake Bay tributary restoration. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 3: 259–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs E (2005) The two culture problem: Ecological restoration and the integration of knowledge. Restoration Ecology

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs R (1997) Future landscapes and the future of landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning 37: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1998) Surprise for science, resilience for ecosystems and incentives for people. Ecological Applications 6: 733–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (2000) Theories for sustainable futures. Conservation Ecology 4 (2):7 (Editorial)[online]

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Berkes F, and Folke C (1999) Science, sustainability and resources management. In: Berkes BF, Folke C, and Colding J (eds) Linking SocialSystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle F (1983) The Intelligent Universe. Michael Joseph, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull RB, Robertson DP, Richert D, Seekamp E, and Buhyoff GJ (2003a) Assumptions about ecological scale and nature knowing best hiding in environmental decisions. Conservation Ecology, 6: 12. [online] URL:http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss2/art12

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull RB, Robertson DP, and Buhyoff GJ (2003b) Beyond the interventionist-preservationist duality. Conservation Ecology 7, 1: 4. [online]URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss1/resp4

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihse M, and Lindahl C (2000) A holistic model for landscape ecology in practice: the Swedish survey and management of ancient meadows and pastures.Landscape and Urban Planning 50: 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2000) IUCN Species Survival Commission Report Red List of Threatened Species World Commission- IUCN. Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch E (1970) Inter-and transdisciplinary university: A systems approach to education and innovation. Policy Sciences 1: 203–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch E (1980) The Self-organizing Universe. Scientific and Human Implications of the Emerging Paradigm of Evolution. Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. Environmental Psychology 15: 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn J, and Vos W (eds) (2000) From Landscape ecology to Landscape Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dodrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler A (1969) Beyond atomism and holism – the concept of the holon. In: Koestler and Smithies JR (eds) Beyond Reductionism: New Perspectives in the Life Sciences. Hutchinson of London, London, pp 192–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroenert R, Steinhard U and Volk M (eds) (2001) Landscape Balance and Landscape Assessment. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1970) The Structure of the Scientific Revolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer H (1970) Die oekologische Gliederung der Landschaft und ihre Bedeutung fuer die Fragestellung der Landschaftspflege. Landschaft 1 Stadt 3: 2–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer H (1973) Oekologie der geosozialen Umwelt. Landschaft 1 Stadt 3: 2–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen J (2003) Record Heat Wave in Europe takes 35, 000 lives. Far Greater Losses May Lie Ahead. Eco-Economy Update 2003–9. [online] htp://www.earth-policy.org/Updates/Update29.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo E (1972) Introduction to Systems Philosophy: Toward a New Paradigm of Contemporary Thought. Harper Torchbooks, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo E (1987) Evolution: The Grand Synthesis. Shambhala New Science Library, Boston, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo E (1994) The Choice: Evolution or Extinction. A Thinking Person”s Guide to Global Issues. C. P. Putnam & Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo E (2001) MACROSHIFT Navigating the Transformation to a Sustainable World. BK Berret-Koehler Publishers, Inc. San Francisco, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo E (2003) The Connectivity Hypothesis. State of University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo E (2004) Science and the Akashi Field An Integral Theory of Everything. Inner Traditions Rochester, Vermont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leser H (1991) Landschaftsoekologie. Eugen Ulmer Gmb H & CO. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin S (1999) Fragile Dominion Plexity and the Commons. Helix Books Perseus Publishing. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B-L (1996) Fuzzy modeling in ecology. Ecological Modeling 90: 109–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B-L (2000a) Why is the holistic approach becoming so important in landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning 50: 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig D (2001) Crisis and transformation. Conservation Ecology 5, 1:11. [online] URL: htpp://www.consecol/org.Vol5/iss1/art11

    Google Scholar 

  • Luz F (2000) Participatory landscape ecology- A basis for acceptance and implementation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50: 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyle JT (1994) Regenerative Design for Sustainable Development. John Wiley & Sons, New York. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhzoumi J, and Pungetti G (1999) Ecological Landscape Design and Planning: The Mediterranean Context. E & FN Spon, London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansvelt JD, and van der Lubbe MJ (1999) Checklist for Sustainable Landscape Management. Final Report to the European Community on the Landscape and Nature Protection Capacity of Organic/Sustainable Types of Agriculture. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ, and Pickett STA (ed.) (1993) Humans as Components of Ecosystems. The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas. Springer New York, Berlin, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss MR (1999) Interdisciplinarity, landscape ecology and the Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes”. Landscape Ecology 15: 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller F, and Bai-Lian Li (2004) Complex systems approach to study human environmental interactions. In: Hong S et al. (eds) Ecological Response and Strategy. Issues in a Changing World State, pp 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (1990) Statements at the closing session of the First International Conference on Cultural Aspects of Landscape. In: Svoboda H (ed.) Cultural Aspects of Landscape. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands, p 173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1971) Conservation of ecological diversity of Mediterranean ecosystems through ecological management. In Duffy E, and Watt AS (eds) The Scientific Management of Animal and Plant Communities for Conservation. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp 605–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1984) Towards a transdisciplinary conceptual framework of landscape ecology. Proc. First Inter. Seminar on Methodology in Landscape Ecological Research and Planning. Roskilde University Center, October 1984, pp. 35–45, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1988) Multifunctional reconstruction of semi-arid Mediterranean landscapes. In: Allen E.B (ed.) The Reconstruction of disturbed Arid Lands. An Ecological Approach. American Association for the Advancement of Sciences. Symposium 109. Westview Press, Inc. Boulder, Colorado, pp 234–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1990) Landscape ecology as a bridge between bio-ecology and human ecology. Svobodova H (ed.) Cultural Aspects of Landscape. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands, p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1993) Red Books for threatened Mediterranean landscapes as an innovative tool for holistic landscape conservation. Introduction to the western Crete Red Book case study. Special Issue. Landscape and Urban Planning, 24: 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1994) The role of fire and its management in the conservation of Mediterranean ecosystems and landscapes. In: Moreno J, and Oechel WC (eds) The Role of Fire in Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems. Springer Verlag, New York, USA, pp 163–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1995) Interactions of landscapes and cultures.Landscape and Urban Planning 32: 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1998a) Culture and landscape conservation – a landscape ecological perspective. In: Gopal B, Pathak PS, and Saxena KG (eds) Ecology Today: An Anthology of Contemporary Ecological Research. International Scientific Publications. New Delhi, India, 19–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1998b) Ecological and cultural landscape restoration and the cultural evolution towards a post-industrial symbiosis between human society and nature. Restoration Ecology 6: 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1998c) From biodiversity to ecodiversity – holistic conservation of biological and cultural diversity of Mediterranean landscapes. In: Montenegro G, Jaksic F, and Rundel PW (eds) Landscape Disturbance and Biodiversity in Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems. Ecological Studies 136. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany, pp 23–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2000) What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction. Special issue, Landscape and Urban Planning 50: 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2001) Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Special issue, Landscape and Urban Planning 57:269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2002) A transdisciplinary education program for regional sustainable development. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 28:167–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2003) The importance of multifunctional, self-organizing biosphere landscapes for the future of our Total Human Ecosystem – a new paradigm for transdisciplinary landscape ecology. In: Brandt, J. sand H, Vejre (eds). Southhampton, U.K. pp 33–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2005) Epilogue: Toward a transdisciplinary science of ecological and cultural landscape restoration.Restoration Ecology 13: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z, and Lieberman AS (1994) Landscape Ecology Theory and Applications. 2nd ed Springer-Verlag New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neef E (1982) Stages in the development of landscape ecology. In: Tjallingi SP and de Veer AA (eds) Perspectives in Landscape Ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss R (2000) Maintaining the ecological integrity of landscapes and ecoregions. In: Ecological Integrity. Integrating Environment, Conservation, and Health. Island Press, Washington D. C., Covelo, California, USA, pp 191–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1971) Fundamentals of Ecology. 3rd edn. W.B. Saunders Company. Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT (1971). Environment, Power and Society. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EC, and Odum HT (1980) Energy systems and environmental education. In: T. Bakshi and Z. Naveh editors. Environmental Education: Principles, Methods and Applications. Plenum Press, New York and London, pp 213–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV (2001). Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? (with full military honors, of course!) Ecology 82, 3275–3284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreszczyn S (1999) A systems approach to the research of people’s relationships with English hedgerows. Landscape and Urban Planning 50: 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr DW (1992) Ecological Literacy. Education and the Transition to a Postmodern World. State University of New York Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palang H, Mander U, and Naveh Z (2000) Holistic Landscape Ecology in Action. (Special Issue) Landscape and Urban Planning. 50: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil GP, Johnson GD, and Myers WL (1998) Statistical ecology of landscape characterization with satellite data for resource assessment and management: an ecological indicator approach. In: Gopal B, Pathak PS, and Saxen KG (eds) Ecology Today: An Anthology of Contemporary Ecological Research. International Scientific Publication, New Delhi, pp. 453–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroli B (1989) Die Sprache der Landschaft. Elemente der Naturwissenschaft, 51: 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pignatti S (1994) Ecologia del Paesaggio. Unione Tipografica Editrice Tornewse (UTET), Turino, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Westra L, and Noss RF (2000) Ecological Integrity. Integrating Environment, Conservation, and Health. Island Press, Washington D. C., Covelo, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt McGinn A (2002) Our toxic burden. In: L. Starke (ed.) State of the World Report 2002. The Worldwatch Institute,. Norton & Company New York, London, U.K., pp 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine I (1997) The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine I, and Stengers I (1984) Order out of Chaos. Man’s Dialogue with Nature. New Science Library Shambhala, Boston and London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees W (2000) Patch disturbance, ecofootprints, and biological integrity: Revisiting the limits to growth (or why industrial society is inherently unsustainable). In: Pimentel D, Westra L and Noss RF (eds) Ecological Integrity Integrating Environment, Conservation, and Health. Island Press, Washington D.C., Covelo, California, USA, pp 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (2003) Win-Win Ecology: How the Earth’s Species Can Survive in the Midst of Human Enterprise. Oxford University Press New York ,USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roszak TR, Gomes ME, and Kanner AD (eds) (1995) Ecopsychology. Restoring the Earth Healing the Mind. Sierra Club Books. San Francisco, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruzicka M (1998) Contribution of Slovak Landscape Ecology for IALE. Ecologia (Bratislava) 17, Supplement 1: 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruzicka M, and Miklos L (1982) Methodology of ecological landscape evaluation for optimal development of territory. In: Tjallingii SP, and de Veer AA (eds) Perspectives in Landscape Ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieferle RP (1997) Rueckblick auf die Natur. Eine Geschichte des Menschen und Seiner Umwelt. Luchterhand Literatur Verlag, Muenchen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow CP (1963) The Two Cultures: A Second Look. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley AG (1935) The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 43, 284–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toupal RS (2003) Cultural landscapes as a methodology for understanding natural resource management impacts in he western United States. Conservation Ecology 7 [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss11/art12

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, Tress G, and Decamps H (eds) (2001) Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. (Special issue) Landscape and Urban Planning 57: 137–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, and Tress G (2002) Characteristic of disciplinary and meta-disciplinary approaches. In: Bastian O, and Steinhardt U (eds) Development and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology. Conceptions, Methods, Application. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dodrecht, The Netherlands, pp 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, Tress G van der Valk A, and Fry G (eds) (2003) Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary landscape Studies: Potentials and Limitations. Delta Series 2, Wageningen 2003, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan Yi-Fu (1974) Topohilia A Study of Environmental Perceptions, Attitudes, and Values. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Gardner R, and O’Neill RVO (2001) Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice, Pattern and Process. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young GL (1974) Human Ecology as an interdisciplinary concept. A critical inquiry. Advances in Ecological Research 8: 1–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Maarel E (1977) {\it Toward a Global Ecological Model for Physical Planning in the Netherlands. Ministry of Housing and Physical Planning, The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B (2000) Analyzing integrated social-ecological systems. Executive Summary. Wallenberg Workshop. September 12–14 2000. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Stockholm [online] htpp://www.resiliance.org/reports/Wallenberg-report.dec00.htlm

    Google Scholar 

  • Wali A, Darlow G, Fialkowski C, Tudor M, del Campo H, and Stotz D (2003) New methodologies for interdisciplinary research and action in an urban ecosystem in Chicago. Conservation Ecology 7 [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art2

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltner-Toews D, Kay JJ, Neudoerffer C, and Gitau T (2003) Perspective changes everything: managing ecosystems from the inside out. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward DJ (2003). Redefining ecology. Conservation Ecology, 7 [online]URL:http://www.consecol.org/vol7 /iss1/resp8art2

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg GM (1975) Introduction to General Systems Thinking. John Wiley & Sons. New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss PA (1969) The living system: determinism stratified. In: Koestler A, and Smithies J (eds) Beyond Reductionism: New Perspectives in the Life Sciences. Hutchinson of London, U.K., pp 2–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizsaecker E von (1974) Offene Systeme: Beitraege zur Zeitstruktur von Informationen, Entropie and Evolution. St.Klett, Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winder, N. 2003. Successes and problems when conduting interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary (=intergrative) research. In: Tress, B., Tress, G., van der Valk, A., and G. Fry, editors. 2003. Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary landscape studies: Potentials and Limitations. Delta Series 2, Wageningen 2003, The Netherlands. pp. 74–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resources 2000–2001 (2000) People and Ecosystems. The Fraying Web of Life. Elsevier Science. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld IS (1982) Land(scape) ecology, a science or a state of mind. In: S.P. Tjallingii and A.A. de Veer, editors. Perspectives in Landscape Ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld IS (1995) Land Ecology. An Introduction to Landscape Ecology as a Base for Land Evaluation, Land management and Conservation. SPB Academic Publishing, Oxford U.K.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Z. Naveh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naveh, Z. (2007). The Transformation of Landscape Ecology and Restoration Ecology into Transdisciplinary Sciences of Holistic Landscape Study, Management and Planning, Conservation and Restoration. In: Transdisciplinary Challenges in Landscape Ecology and Restoration Ecology. Landscape Series, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4422-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation