Skip to main content

New Methods for Conflict Data

  • Chapter
Programming for Peace

Part of the book series: Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation ((AGDN,volume 2))

Abstract

This chapter sketches out some new ways to look at conflict data sets. Since political scientists have more computer power available to them than at perhaps any point in the past, the paper emphasizes methods whose principle feature is that they purchase substantive realism at the cost of more compute cycles, not more advanced statistics. Existing statistical theory is sufficient to perform much more realistic analyses than are typically performed, but it is not necessarily found in the standard location. Most of the models and methods described here can be found in other guises in the field of machine learning. Political methodology is often accused of importing techniques wholesale from other disciplines, particularly econometrics, and by introducing machine learning as another field worth mining, this paper continues a long tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akaike, H., 1973, Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle, in Petrov, B. N., and Caski, F., eds., Second International Symposium on Information Theory, Akademiai Kaido, Budapest, pp. 267–281. Reprinted in Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike, Parzen, E., Tanabe, K., and Kitagawa, G., eds., 1998, Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., and Trivedi, P. K., 1998, Regression Analysis of Count Data. Econometric Society Monographs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, E., Guitierrez, J. M., and Hadi, A. S., 1999, Expert Systems and Probabilistic Network Models, Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucet, A., de Freitas, N., and Gordon, N., 2001, Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice, Springer Verlag, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, J., and Koopman, S. J., 2001, Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D. C., Goldstone, J., Gurr, T. R., Harff, B., Surko, P. T., Unger, A. N., and Chen, R., 1998, The state failure project: Early warning research for US foreign policy planning, in Davies, J. L., and Gurr, T. R., eds., Preventive Measures: Building Risk Assessment and Crisis Early Warning Systems, Rowman and Littlefield, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B. S., 1984, An Introduction to Latent Variable Models, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürnkranz, J., Petrak, J., Trappl, R., and Bercovitch, J., 1994, Machine Learning Methods for International Conflict Databases: A Case Study in Predicting Mediation Outcome, Technical Report OEFAI-TR-94-33, Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., and Rubin, D. R., 2000, Bayesian Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerner, D. J., Abu-Jabr, Schrodt, P. A., and Yilmaz, O., 2002, Conflict and Mediation Event Observations (CAMEO): A new event data framework for the analysis of foreign policy interactions, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerner, D. J., Schrodt, P. A., Francisco, R. A., and Weddle, J. L., 1994, The analysis of political events using machine coded data, International Studies Quarterly 38:91–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour and Cooper, 1999, Computation, Causation and Discovery, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. S., 1992, A conflict-cooperation scale for WEIS events data, Journal of Conflict Resolution 36:369–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. S., and Pevehouse, J. C., 1997, Reciprocity, bullying and international cooperation: Time-series analysis of the Bosnia conflict, American Political Science Review 91:515–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A. C., 1991, Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A. C., 1993, Time Series Models, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G. and Lowe, W., 2003, An automated information extraction tool for international conflict data with performance as good as human coders: a rare events evaluation design, International Organization, 57: 617–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G., Keohane, R. O., and Verba, S., 1994, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, R., and Rubin, D., 1987, Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, C., 1978, World Event/Interaction Survey, 1966–1978. WEIS Codebook ICPSR 5211, Inter-university consortium for political and social research, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. M., 1997, Machine Learning, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Most, B. A., and Starr, H., 1984, International relations, foreign policy substitutability, and “nice” laws, World Politics, 36:383–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M., 1998, Fighting for Peace, Harvill, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrodt, P. A., 2004, Patterns, Rules and Learning: Computational Models of International Behavior, available from http://www.ku.edu/~keds/papers.dir/Schrodt.PRL.2.0.pdf.

  • Singer, J. D., and Diehl, P., 1990, Measuring the Correlates of War, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappl, R., Fürnkranz, J., and Petrak, J., 1996, Digging for Peace: Using Machine Learning Methods for Assessing International Conflict Databases, Technical Report OEFAI-TR-96-10, Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappl, R., Fürnkranz, J., Petrak, J., and Bercovitch, J., 1997, Machine Learning and Case-Based Reasoning: Their Potential Role in Preventing the Outbreak of Wars or in Ending Them, Technical Report OEFAI-TR-97-10, Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN, 1992, Final Report of the Commission of Experts (Siege of Sarajevo), United Nations Security Council.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lowe, W. (2006). New Methods for Conflict Data. In: Trappl, R. (eds) Programming for Peace. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4390-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics