Abstract
An earlier study by Druckman et al. (1999) showed that a variety of cases of international negotiation can be distinguished in terms of their objectives. A set of 16 features of negotiation effectively distinguished—by multidimensional scaling (MDS)—among the types of international negotiation objectives proposed by Iklé (1964). The features include aspects of the parties, issues, process, negotiating environment, and outcomes. The statistical analyses performed in that study showed a distinct profile for each of the Iklé categories: innovation, re-distribution, extension, normalization, and side effects. In addition, a sixth category was identified as being different than the others. This category was referred to as multilateral regime negotiations, a form that became prevalent twenty years after Iklés book appeared. These results were further supported by discriminant analysis classifications. When only information about the 16 features were known, 78 % (or 21 of 27 cases) were placed in the correct a priori category. These are impressive results. They provide empirical validation for this well-known typology of negotiation. In this chapter, an attempt is made to extend these analyses in several directions with the help of sophisticated methodological approaches not previously used to interpret data on negotiation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agrawal, R., Mannila, H., Srikant, R., Toivonen, H., and Verkamo, A.I., 1995, Fast discovery of association rules, in Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Fayyad, U. M., Piatetsky-Shapiro G., Smyth, P., and Uthurusamy, R., eds., AAAI Press, Cambridge, MA.
Beriker, N. and Druckman, D., 1996, Simulating the Lausanne Peace Negotiations, 1922–1923: Power asymmetries in bargaining, Simulation & Gaming 27: 162–183.
Bartos, O. J., 1995, Modeling distributive and integrative negotiations, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 542: 48–60.
Breiman, L., 2001, Statistical modeling: The two cultures, Statistical Science 16: 199–231. (With comments by D. R. Cox, B. Efron, B. Hoadley, and E. Parzen, a rejoinder by the author.)
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R. and Stone, C., 1984, Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth & Brooks, Pacific Grove, CA.
Cohen, W. W., 1995, Fast effective rule induction, in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning (ML-95), Lake Tahoe, CA, Prieditis, A., and Russell, S., eds., Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
Druckman, D., 1997, Dimensions of international negotiations: Structures, processes, and outcomes, Group Decision and Negotiation 6: 395–420.
Druckman, D., 1994, Determinants of compromising behavior in negotiation: A meta-analysis, Journal of Conflict Resolution 38: 507–556.
Druckman, D., 1993, The situational levers of negotiating flexibility, Journal of Conflict Resolution 37: 236–276.
Druckman, D., and Bonoma, T. V., 1976, Determinants of bargaining behavior in a bilateral monopoly situation II: Opponent concession rate and similarity, Behavioral Science 21: 252–262.
Druckman, D., Harris, R., and Ramberg, B., 2002, Computer-aided international negotiation: A tool for research and practice, Group Decision and Negotiation 11: 231–256.
Druckman, D., Rozelle, R., and Baxter, J., 1982, Nonverbal Communication: Survey, Theory, and Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Druckman, D., Martin, J., Allen Nan, S. and Yagcioglu, D., 1999, Dimensions of international negotiation: A test of Iklé's typology, Group Decision and Negotiation 8: 89–108.
Friedman, J. H., and Fisher, N. I., 1999, Bump hunting in high-dimensional data, Statistics and Computing 9: 1–20.
Fürnkranz, J., 1999, Separate-and-conquer rule learning, Artificial Intelligence Review 13: 3-54
Fürnkranz. J., 1997, Pruning algorithms for rule learning, Machine Learning 27: 139–171.
Halpern, J., 1994, The effect of friendship on personal business transactions, Journal of Conflict Resolution 38: 647–664.
Headland, T. N., Pike, K. L., and Harris, M., eds., 1990, Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate, Sage , Newbury Park, CA.
Hipp, J., Güntzer, U., and Nakhaeizadeh, G., 2000, Algorithms for association rule mining-a general survey and comparison, SIGKDD Explorations 2: 58–64.
Iklé, F. C., 1964, How Nations Negotiate, Harper, New York.
Irmer, C. G., 2003, The Promise of Process: Evidence on Ending Violent International Conflict, unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.
Kohavi, R., 1995, A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection, in Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95), Mellish, C. S., ed., Morgan Kaufmann, Montreal.
Quinlan, J. R., 1993, C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
Quinlan, J. R., 1986, Induction of decision trees, Machine Learning 1:81–106.
Stone, M., 1977, Asymptotics for and against cross-validation, Biometrika 64: 29–35.
Stone, M., 1974, Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 36:111–147.
Trappl, R., Fürnkranz, J., Bercovitch, J., and Petrak, J., 1997, Machine learning and case-based reasoning: Their potential role in preventing the outbreak of wars or in ending them, in Learning, Networking, and Statistics, Riccia, G. D., Kruse, R., and Lenz, H., eds., Springer, New York.
Webb, G. I., 2000, Efficient search for association rules, in Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-2000), Boston, MA, ACM Press, New York.
Witten. I. H., and Frank, E., 2000, Data Mining-Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Druckman, D., Harris, R., Fürnkranz, J. (2006). Modeling International Negotiation Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches. In: Trappl, R. (eds) Programming for Peace. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4390-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4390-2_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4377-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4390-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)