Advertisement

Bacterioplankton abundance and activity in a small hypertrophic stratified lake

  • Helen Tammert
  • Veljo Kisand
  • Tiina Nõges
Chapter
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 182)

Abstract

Bacterioplankton abundance and production were followed during one decade (1991–2001) in the hypertrophic and steeply stratified small Lake Verevi (Estonia). The lake is generally dimictic. However, a partly meromictic status could be formed in specific meteorological conditions as occurred in springs of 2000 and 2001. The abundance of bacteria in Lake Verevi is highly variable (0.70 to 22 × 106 cells ml−1) and generally the highest in anoxic hypolimnetic water. In 2000–2001, the bacterial abundance in the hypolimnion increased probably due to meromixis. During a productive season, heterotrophic bacteria were able to consume about 10–40% of primary production in the epilimnion. Our study showed that bacterioplankton in the epilimnion was top-down controlled by predators, while in metalimnion bacteria were dependent on energy and carbon sources (bottom-up regulated). Below the thermocline hypolimnetic bacteria mineralized organic matter what led to the depletion of oxygen and created anoxic hypolimnion where rich mineral nutrient and sulphide concentrations coexisted with high bacterial numbers.

Key words

total number of bacteria bacterioplankton production stratified hypertrophic lake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, J. H. & R. F. Harris, 1986. r-and K-selection and microbial ecology. Adv. Microbial Ecol. 9: 99–147.Google Scholar
  2. Baines, S. B. & M. L. Pace, 1991. The production of dissolved organic matter by phytoplankton and its importance to bacteria-patterns across marine and freshwater systems. Limnology and Oceanography 36: 1078–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, R. T., G. M. Ahlgren & I. Ahlgren, 1983. Estimating bacterioplankton production by measuring (3H)thymidine incorporation in a eutrophic Swedish lake. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 45: 1709–1721.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Biddanda, B., M. Ogdahl & J. Cotner, 2001. Dominance of bacterial metabolism in oligotrophic relative to eutrophic waters. Limnology and Oceanography 46: 730–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camacho, A., J. Erez, A. Chicote, M. Florin, M. M. Squires, C. Lehmann & R. Bachofen, 2001. Microbial microstratification, inorganic carbon photoassimilation and dark carbon fixation at the chemocline of the meromictic Lake Cadagno (Switzerland) and its relevance to the food web. Aquatic Sciences 63: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlsson, P. & D. A. Caron, 2001. Seasonal variation of phosphorus limitation of bacterial growth in a small lake. Limnology and Oceanography 46: 108–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edler, L. (ed), 1979. Phytoplankton and Chlorophyll. The Baltic Marine Biologists, 38 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Gasol, J. M., 1994. A framework for the assessment of top-down vs bottom-up control of heterotrophic Nanoflagellate abundance. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 113: 291–300.Google Scholar
  9. Hoch, M.P.& D. L. Kirchman, 1993. Seasonal and Inter-Annual Variability in Bacterial Production and Biomass in a Temperate Estuary. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 98: 283–295.Google Scholar
  10. Jespersen, A.-M. & K. Christoffersen, 1987. Measurements of chlorophyll a from phytoplankton, using ethanol as an extraction solvent. Archiv für Hüdrobiologie Hydrobiol 109: 445–454.Google Scholar
  11. Kasprzak, P., F. Gervais, R. Adrian, W. Weiler, R. Radke, I. Jager, S. Riest, U. Siedel, B. Schneider, M. Bohme, R. Eckmann & N. Walz, 2000. Trophic characterization, pelagic food web structure and comparison of two mesotrophic lakes in Brandenburg (Germany). International Review of Hydrobiology 85: 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Loopmann, A., 1984. Suuremate Eesti järvede morfomeetrilised andmed ja veevahetus. Tallinn, 150 lk. [Morphometrical data and water exchange of larger Estonian lakes. In Estonian].Google Scholar
  13. Nõges, P., 2005. Water and nutrient mass balance of the partly meromictic temperate Lake Verevi. Hydrobiologia 547: 21–31.Google Scholar
  14. Nõges, T. & K. Kangro, 2005. Primary production of phytoplankton in a strongly stratified temperate lake. Hydrobiologia 547: 105–122.Google Scholar
  15. Nõges, T. & I. Solovjova, 2000. The influence of different solvents and extraction regimes on the recovery of chlorophyll a from freshwater phytoplankton. Geophysica 36: 161–168.Google Scholar
  16. Ott, I., T. Kõiv, P. Nõges, A. Kisand, A. Järvalt. & E. Kirt, 2005. General description of partly meromictic hypertrophic Lake Verevi, its ecological status, changes during the past eight decades and restoration problems. Hydrobiologia 547: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Porter, K. G. & Y. S. Feig, 1980. The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora. Limnology and Oceanography 25: 943–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reinart, A., Arst, H. & D.C. Pierson, 2005. Optical properties and light climate in Lake Verevi. Hydrobiologia 547: 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Steeman-Nielsen, E., 1952. The use of radioactive carbon (14C) for measuring primary production in the sea. Journal du Conseil permanent international pour l’exploration del la mer 18: 117–140.Google Scholar
  20. Weinbauer, M. G. & M. G. Höfle, 1998. Distribution and life strategies of two bacterial populations in a eutrophic lake. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64: 3776–3783.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wicks, R. J. & R. D. Robarts, 1987. The extraction and purification of DNA labelled with [methyl-3H]thymidine in aquatic bacterial production studies. Journal of Plankton Research 9: 1159–1166.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Tammert
    • 1
  • Veljo Kisand
    • 1
  • Tiina Nõges
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Zoology and BotanyEstonian Agricultural UniversityRannu, Tartu CountyEstonia

Personalised recommendations