Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 28))

  • 1232 Accesses

Abstract

If ethics is to say anything helpful concerning human practice it must develop a vision of what is good in human life. This is the job of ethics. But in attempting this we are to a certain extent afflicted by the epistemological limitations of our vision and knowledge of practice. An ethics that does not reflect on these constraints would not be eligible as a good guide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ach, Johann S. and Runtenberg Christa. Bioethik: Disziplin und Diskurs. Zur Selbstaufklärung angewandter Ethik. Frankfurt a.M./New York: Campus, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anobile, Richard J. (ed.). Frankenstein. London: Picador, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristoteles. Nikomachische Ethik VI. Herausgegeben und übersetzt von Hans-Georg Gadamer. Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attfield, Robin and Belsey, Andrew (eds.). Philosophy and the Natural Environment. [Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement: 36] Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib Seyla. “The Generalized and the Concrete Other. The Kohlberg-Gilligan Controversy and Moral Theory.” In Women and Moral Theory. Eva Feder Kittay, Diana T. Meyers eds. Savage MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1987, 154–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, Hartmut and Böhme, Gernot. Das Andere der Vernunft. Zur Entwicklung von Rationalitätsstrukturen am Beispiel Kants. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadie, Sarah. Ethics with Aristotle. New York/Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. Kritik der ethischen Gewalt. Adorno-Vorlesungen 2002. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, John. “The End of Ethics.” In The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000, 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dommelen Ad. (ed.). Coping with Deliberate Release. The Limits of Risk Assessment. Tilburg/Buenos Aires: International Centre for Human and Public Affairs, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt H. Tristram. The Foundations of Bioethics. New York/Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt H. Tristram. “Konsens: Auf wieviel können wir hoffen?” In Moralischer Konsens. Technische Eingriffe in die menschliche Fortpflanzung als Modellfall. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1996, 30–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Johannes. Medizin-und bioethische Perspektiven. Beiträge zur Urteilsbildung im Bereich von Medizin und Biologie. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, Richard M. Moral Thinking. Its Levels, Methods and Point. Oxford: Clarendon, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hübner, Karin et al. “Derivation of Oocytes from Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells.” Science 2003, 300, 1251–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, Albert R. and Toulmin, Stephen. The Abuse of Casuistry. A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, Albert R. The Birth of Bioethics. New York/Oxford: 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Akademie-Ausgabe, Bd. 4, 387–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellenberger, James. Relationship Morality. University Park PA: Penn State Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellenberger, James. Moral Relativism, Moral Diversity and Human Relationships. University Park, PA: Penn State Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, Eva Feder. Love'Labor. Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York/London: Routledge, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, Arthur. “Moral Experience and Ethical Reflection” Daedalus Fall 1999, 69–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. Dependent Rational Animals. Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. London: Duckworth, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert King. “Social Structures and Anomie.” In Social Theory and Social Structure. Robert King Merton (ed.). New York: The Free Press, 1968, 185–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, Diana T. Self, Society and Personal Choice. New York: Columbia Univ. Pr., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, George Edward. Principia Ethica. (1903) übers. B. Wisser, Stuttgart: Reclam, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Thomas. The View from Nowhere. New York/Oxford: Oxford Univ. Pr., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEK-CNE, Nationale Ethikkommission im Bereich Humanmedizin. Zur Forschung an embryonalen Stammzellen. Stellungnahme 3/2002. Bern, Juni 2002 (see www.nek-cne.ch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann Nelson, Hilde (ed.). Stories and their Limits. Narrative Approaches to Bioethics. New York/London: Routledge, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehmann-Sutter, Christoph. “Frankensteinian Knowledge?” The Monist 1996, 79, 264–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehmann-Sutter, Christoph. “Contextual Bioethics.” Perspektiven der Philosophie 1999, 25, 315–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehmann-Sutter, Christoph. “Bioethik.” In Handbuch Ethik. Marcus Düwell et al. (eds.). Stuttgart: Metzler, 2002, 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, Paul. Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Sevuil, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarano, Nico. “ Metaethik -ein systematischer überblick”. In Handbuch Ethik. Marcus Düwell et al. (eds.). Stuttgart: Metzler, 2002, 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, Jackie Leach; Rippberger, Christine and Rehmann-Sutter, Christoph. “Additional Ethical Issues in Genetic Medicine Perceived by the Potential Patients.” In Populations and Genetics. Legal and Socio-Ethical Perspectives. Leiden/Boston: Nijhoff, 2003, 623–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, Jackie Leach; Rippberger, Christine and Rehmann-Sutter, Christoph. “Non-professionals' evaluations of gene therapy ethics.” Social Science and Medicine 2004, 58, 1415–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self. The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, James A. et al. “Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts.” Science 282, 1998, 1145–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urmson, J.O. Aristotle's Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernhard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, David. Moral Relativity. Berkeley: Univ. of California Pr., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rehmann-Sutter, C. (2006). LIMITS OF BIOETHICS. In: Rehmann-Sutter, C., Düwell, M., Mieth, D. (eds) Bioethics in Cultural Contexts. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4241-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics