Skip to main content

DIMENSIONS OF CULTURAL DIVERSITY OF MEDICAL ETHICS

  • Chapter
Bioethics in Cultural Contexts

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 28))

  • 1190 Accesses

Abstract

The title of my article carries a significant theoretical difficulty. In what sense can we speak about cultural diversity and “ethics”? In the work “Modernity – An Incomplete Project” Habermas recalls the idea of Max Weber fundamental to this topic who “characterised cultural modernity as the separation of substantive reason expressed in religion and metaphysics into three autonomous spheres. They are: science, morality, and art” (Habermas 1987: 148). That is why as soon as we start using the word “ethics” which from the time of Aristotle has meant a theoretical (secular) way of discriminating “good” and “evil”, we are immediately in danger of losing “cultural diversity” as soon as other forms of moral evaluation are neglected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beck, U. Risk Society. Towards An Other Modernity. [Russian translation] Moscow: Progress-Tradition, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. “Judging the Future: Whose Falt Will It Be.” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2000, 25, 3, 679ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, H.T. Jr. The Foundations of Bioethics.New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. “Modernity - An Incomplete Project.” InInterpretive Social Science. A Second Look. P. Rabinow and W.M. Sullivan (eds.). Univ. of California Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A.R. Paper presented at the Euresco-conference “Bioethics -an interdisciplinary challenge and a cultural project. 8–13. Sept. 2001, Davos, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. The Psychology of Moral Development. San Francisco, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Fanu, J. The Rise and Fall of Modern Medicine. London: Little Brown Company, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E.D. and Thomasma, D.C. For the Patient's Good. Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. Oneself as Another. Paris, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D.J. “Research, Human: Historical Aspects.” In Encyclopedia of Bioethics, Revised Edition. W.Th. Reich (ed.). New York: Macmillan Library Reference, Simon and Schuster Macmillan, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaemann is quoted from Habermas, J. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Translated by C. Lenhardt and S.W. Nicholsen. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunshine Project. An Introduction to Biological Weapons, their Prohibition, and the Relationship to Biosafety. Third World Network, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tishchenko, P. “The Goals of Moral Reflection.” InAdvances in Bioethics. M. Evans (ed.). JAI Pres INC., 1998, v. 4, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R.M. A Theory of Medical Ethics. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Publishers, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (1964), Adopted by 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

TISHCHENKO, P. (2006). DIMENSIONS OF CULTURAL DIVERSITY OF MEDICAL ETHICS. In: Rehmann-Sutter, C., Düwell, M., Mieth, D. (eds) Bioethics in Cultural Contexts. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4241-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics