Skip to main content

Deriving Split Ergativity in the Progressive

  • Chapter
ERGATIVITY

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 65))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alcázar, A. 2002. Aspectual Interpretation in Basque. Ms., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcázar, A. 2003 ‘The imperfective paradox of Basque’, USC Working Papers in Lingusitics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldai, G. 2002. ‘Split ergativity in Basque: The Pre-Basque antipassive-imperfective hypothesis.’ Folia Linguistica Historica XXI/1-2, 31-97

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Cortés, A. 2002 Lingüística. Madrid: Cátedra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artiagoitia Beaskoetxea, X. 2002. ‘The functional structure of the Basque noun phrase.’ In X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artiagoitia, P. Goenaga y J.A: Lakarra, eds., Erramu Boneta: A festschrift for Rudolf P. G. de Rijk, ASJU-EHU, Bilbao.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, M. & K. Hale. 1996. ‘Ergativity: towards a theory of a heterogeneous class.’ Linguistic Inquiry 27:4, 531-604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, J.D. 1992. ‘Nominally absolutive is not absolutely nominative.’ Proceedings of WCCFL11, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, J., R. Perkins, and W. Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago/London:The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DelLancey 1994. ‘Grammaticalization and linguistic theory.’ Proceedings of the 1993 Mid-America Linguistics Conference and Conference on Siouan/Caddoan Languages, pp. 1-22. Boulder: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLancey 2004. ‘Grammaticalization.’ In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan, eds., Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation. New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirdache, H. & Uribe-Etxebarria M. 1997. ‘The primitives of temporal relations.’ In R. Martin, D. Michael & J. Uriagereka, eds., Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R.M.W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, K. & S. J. Keyser 1993. ‘On Argument Structure and the lexcial expression of syntactic relations.’ In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser, eds., The View from Building 20, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, J. 1988. Pidgins and Creoles, (2 vols.) Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmer, A. 1999 ‘An active analysis of Basque ergativity.’ Fontes Linguae Vasconum XXXI-81, MayoAgosto, 189-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hualde, J. I. & J. Ortiz de Urbina, J. 1987. ‘Restructuring with ARI.’ ASJU International Journal of Basque Philology, XXI-2, 425-452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hualde, J.I. & Ortiz de Urbina, J., eds. 2003. A Grammar of Basque, Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inchauspe, E. 1858. Le verbe basque, Bayonne-Paris. (Facsimile edition, Donostia-San Sebastián 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, A. 1996. ‘Ergativity: working through some recent analyses.’ In Glot International, Volume 2:6, 3-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurylowicz, J. 1964. The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffite, P. 1962. Grammaire Basque. (Navarro-Labourdin littéraire) Elkar, Donostia, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafon, R. 1945. Le système du verbe basque au XVI siécle. Bordeaux: Editions Delmas, Publications de l’Université de Bordeaux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laka, I. & J. Uriagereka. 1987. ‘Barriers for Basque and vice-versa.’ In J. McDonough & B. Plunkett eds., Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society Conference 1986, 394-408. 17-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laka, I. 1993a. ‘The structure of inflection: A Case study in X0 Syntax.’ En J.I. Hualde & J. Ortiz de Urbina eds., Generative Studies in Basque Linguistics, pp.21-70. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 105. Amsterdam/Philadephia :John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laka, I. 1993b. ‘Unergatives that assign ergative, unaccusatives that assign accusative.’ In J. Bobaljik and C. Philips, eds., MITWPL 18: Papers on Case &Agreement 1, 149-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laka, I. 1996. A Brief Grammar of Euskara, the Basque Language. Available at <http://www.ehu.es/grammar>.

  • Laka, I. 2000. ‘Thetablind Case: Burzio´checkentity>s Generalization and its image in the mirror.’ In Arguments and Case. Explaining Burzio’s Generalization, 103-129. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company,

    Google Scholar 

  • Laka, I. 2002. ‘Delimitando la Gramática Universal: la ergatividad en la Gramática generativa.’ In N. Catalá, J. A. Díezeta, J. E García-Albea, eds., El lenguaje y la mente humana, 77-142. Ariel Practicum. Barcelona:Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larramendi, M. 1745. Diccionario Trilingüe del Castellano, Bascuence y Latín, San Sebastián.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. 1983. On the Nature of Ergativity. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateu, J. & L. Amadas 1999. ‘Extended argument structure: Progressive as unaccusative.’ Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, Barcelona, 159-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, A. 1990. The A/A’ Distinction and Movement Theory. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, C. D. 1996 Ergativity. Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelena. 1987. Diccionario General Vasco-Orotariko Euskal Hiztegia, Royal Academy of the Basque Language-Euskaltzaindia, Bilbao: Desclée De Brouwer/Ediciones Mensajero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash L. 1995. Portée argumentale et marquage casuel dans les langues SOV et dans les langues ergatives : l’exemple du géorgien. PhD dissertation, Université Paris VIII, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz de Urbina, J. 1989. Parameters in the Grammar of Basque. Studies in Generative Grammar 33, Dordrecht:Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, P. M. 1977. ‘Antipassive in French.’ LI 1, 333-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, C. 1984. ‘The interface between semantic roles and initial grammatical relations.’ In D. Perlmutter & C. Rosen, eds., Studies in Relational Grammar Volume 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabala, I. & Odriozola, J.C. 1996. ‘On the relation between DP and TP. The structure of Basque infinitivals.’ Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 5/2, Barcelona: Servei de Publicacions Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, pp.231-281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

LAKA, I. (2006). Deriving Split Ergativity in the Progressive. In: JOHNS, A., MASSAM, D., NDAYIRAGIJE, J. (eds) ERGATIVITY. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 65. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4188-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics