Skip to main content

Native and exotic Amphipoda and other Peracarida in the River Meuse: new assemblages emerge from a fast changing fauna

  • Chapter
Book cover Aquatic Biodiversity II

Abstract

Samples issued from intensive sampling in the Netherlands (1992–2001) and from extensive sampling carried out in the context of international campaigns (1998, 2000 and 2001) were revisited. Additional samples from artificial substrates (1992–2003) and other techniques (various periods) were analysed. The combined data provide a global and dynamic view on the Peracarida community of the River Meuse, with the focus on the Amphipoda. Among the recent exotic species found, Crangonyx pseudogracilis is regressing, Dikerogammarus haemobaphes is restricted to the Condroz course of the river, Gammarus tigrinus is restricted to the lowlands and seems to regress, Jaera istri is restricted to the ‘tidal’ Meuse, Chelicorophium curvispinum is still migrating upstream into the Lorraine course without any strong impact on the other amphipod species. After a rapid expansion Dikerogammarus villosus has continued its upstream invasion between 1998 and 2002 at a rate of 30–40 km per year, but no further progression was noticed in 2003. Locally and temporarily the native species (Gammarus fossarum and G. pulex) and naturalized species (G. roeseli and Echinogammarus berilloni) may have been excluded by the most recent invaders (mainly D. villosus), but none of the native and naturalized species has disappeared completely. Therefore, the number of amphipod species found in the River Meuse has increased. Moreover, the native and naturalized species keep on dominating the tributaries from which the recent invaders seem to be excluded. A changing Peracarida community structure is observed along the course of the River Meuse: four native or naturalized species inhabit the upstream (Lorraine) course, three invasive species dominate in the middle reach (Ardenne-Condroz zone), one exotic species is housed in the Border Meuse and three or four invasive species dominate the assemblages in the lowlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bayliss, D. & R. R. Harris, 1990. Chloride ion regulation in the freshwater amphipod Corophium curvispinum and acclimatory effects of external Cl). Journal of Comparative Physiology B 158: 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bij de Vaate, A., 1995. Macroinvertebrate communities in the Grensmaas stretch of the River Meuse: 1980–1990. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 10: 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bij de Vaate, A. & A. G. Klink, 1995. Dikerogammarus villosus Sowinsky (Crustacea: Gammaridea) a new immigrant in the Dutch part of the lower Rhine. Lauterbornia 20: 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.I.M.-I.M.C. (Commission Internationale de la Meuse — Internationale Maascommissie), 2003. Résultats du réseau de mesures homogène — Resultaten van het homogeen meetnet 2002, 99 pp. Palais des Congrès, Liège or http://www.meusemaas. be.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.I.P.M.-I.C.B.M. (Commission Internationale pour la Protection de la Meuse — Internationale Commissie voor de Bescherming van de Maas), 1997. La qualitéde la Meuse en 1994. De kwaliteit van de Maas in 1994, 114 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.I.P.M.-I.C.B.M., 2001. Résultats du réseau de mesures homogè ne — Resultaten van het homogeen meetnet 1999, 159 pp. Palais des Congrès, Liège or http://www.meuse-maas.be.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.I.P.M.-I.C.B.M., 2002a. Résultats du réseau de mesures homogè ne — Resultaten van het homogeen meetnet 2000, 139 pp. Palais des Congrès, Liège or http://www.meuse-maas.be.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.I.P.M.-I.C.B.M., 2002b. Résultats du réseau de mesures homogè ne — Resultaten van het homogeen meetnet 2001, 92 pp. Palais des Congrès, Liège or http://www.meuse-maas.be.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, C., 1964. The amphipods of the deltaic region of the Rivers Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt in relation to the hydrography of the area; part III. The Gammaridae. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 2: 407–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, C., F. W. B. van den Brink & G. van der Velde, 1992. Why was the invasion of the River Rhine by Corophium curvispinum and Corbicula species so successful? Journal of Natural History 26: 1121–1129.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pauw, N., V. Lambert, A. vanKenfoven & A. bij de Vaate, 1994. Comparison of two artificial substrate samplers for macroinvertebrates in biological monitoring of large and deep rivers and canals in Belgium and the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Monitoring & Assessment 30: 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pauw, N., D. Roels & A. P. Fontoura, 1986. Use of artificial substrates for standardized sampling of macroinvertebrates in the assessment of water quality by the Belgian Biotic Index. Hydrobiologia 133: 237–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devin, S., C. Piscart, J. N. Beisel & J. C. Moreteau, 2003. Ecological traits of the amphipod invader Dikerogammarus villosus on the mesohabitat scale. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 158: 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, J. T. A. & D. Platvoet, 2000. Invading predatory crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus eliminates both native and exotic species. Proceedings of the royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 267: 977–983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • d’Udekem d’Acoz, C. & P. Stroot, 1988. Note sur 1’expansion de Corophium curvispinum Sars, 1895 en Meuse (Crustacea, Amphipoda: Corophiidae). Annales de la Sociétéroyale zoologique de Belgique 118: 171–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantzen, N., 1991. De kwaliteit van Rijn-en Maaswater in de periode 1983–1989. Beoordeling met behulp van macroevertebraten. RIWA, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay Environnement, 1997. Indice biologique global adaptéaux grands cours d’eau et aux rivières profondes (I.B.G.A.). Protocole expérimental. Agence de 1’Eau Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse, 45 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. R. & D. Bayliss, 1990. Osmoregulation in Corophium curvispinum (Crustacea: Amphipoda), a recent coloniser of freshwater. III. Evidence for adaptive change in sodium regulation. Journal of comparative Physiology B 160: 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1954. The ecology of Gammarus duebeni Lilljeborg and its occurrence in fresh water in western Britain. Journal of Animal Ecology 23: 38–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes H. B. N., 1970. The ecology of running waters. Liverpool University Press, 541 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jazdzewski, K., 1980. Range extension of some Gammaridean species in European inland Waters caused by human activity. Crutaceana Suppl. 6: 84–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaars, H. A. M., 1993. Die Makro-Invertebratenbesiedlung von künstlichem Substrat in den Flüssen Maas und Rhein im Jahre 1991. Wasser Abwasser 134: 533–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaars, H. A. M. & N. M. L. H. F. Frantzen, 1995. One decade of benthic macroinvertebrate biomonitoring in the River Meuse. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 29: 121–133 with addendum.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaars, H. A. M., F. E. Lambregts-van de Clundert, C. J. Carpentier, A. J. Wagenvoort & W. Hoogenboezem, 1999. Ecological effects of the mass occurrence of the Ponto-Caspian invader Hemimysis anomala G.O. Sars, 1907 (Crustacea: Mysidacea), in a freshwater storage reservoir in the Netherlands, with notes on its autecology and new records. Hydrobiologia 394: 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klink, A. G. & M. A. A. de la Haye, 2000. Inventarisatie van macrofauna in de Limburgse Maasplassen. Reports of the project ‘Ecological rehabilitation of the River Meuse’ RIZA report 34-2000: 73 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornberg, H., & M. H. Williamson (eds), 1987. Quantitative Aspects of the Ecology of Biological Invasions. The royal Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieg, H.-J., 2002. Biomonitoring der Amphipodenfauna in der Oberen, Mittleren und Unteren Elbe. ARGE ELBE (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für die Reinhaltung der Elbe). http:// www.arge-elbe/wge/Download/Dtexte.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, C. M. & C. M. D’Antonio, 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasion. Oikos 87: 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale, W. M., 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80: 1522–1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, H., 2001. Ecotoxicology. In Liefveld, W.M., K. van Looy & K. H. Prins (eds), Biological monitoring of national fresh waters, the River Meuse 1996. RIZA report 2002.022: 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meurisse-Genin, M., A. Reydams-Detollenaere, Ph. Stroot & J.-C. Micha, 1987. Les macroinvertébrés benthiques de la Meuse belge: bilan de cinq années de recherches (1980 à 1984). Archiv für Hydrobiologie 109: 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P. B. & T. Light, 1996. Fish invasions in California: do abiotic factors determine success? Ecology 77: 1666–1670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J., 2001. Taxonomic status and genetic structure of Dikerogammarus-species invading the River Rhine, http:// perdrix.biologie.uni-mainz.de/gammarus/Dikerogammarus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musko, I. B., 1993. The life history of Dikerogammarus haemobaphes (Eichw.) (Crustacea, Amphipoda) living on macrophytes in lake Balaton (Hungary). Archiv für Hydrobiologie 127: 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkster, S., 1993. A revision of the genus Echinogammarus (Stebbing, 1899) with some notes on related genera (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Memorie del Museo di storia naturale (IIo serie) Scienze della vitta (a Biologia) 10: 9–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkster, S. & D. Platvoet, 1983. Further observations on the distribution and biology of two alien amphipods, Gammarus tigrinus Sexton, 1939 and Crangonyx pseudogracilis Bous-field, 1958 in the Netherlands (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Bulletin zoölogisch Museum Universiteit van Amsterdam 9:153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkster, S., M. Scheepmaker, D. Platvoet & N. Broodbakker, 1992. Drastic changes in the amphipod fauna (Crustacea) of Dutch inland waters during the last 25 years. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 61: 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal, S., G. van der Velde, B. G. P. Paffen & A. bij de Vaate, 1998. Growth and production of Corophium curvispinum G.O. Sars, 1895 (Amphipoda) an invader in the lower Rhine. Proceedings of the fourth international Crustacean Congress 1998: 457–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.I.Z.A. (Rijksinstituut voor Integraal Zoetwaterbeheer en Afvalwaterbehandeling), 1998. Proposal for the harmonisation of macroinvertebrate monitoring in the River Meuse, 15 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, O. & G. Josens, 2004. Preliminary study of the scars borne by Gammaridae (Amphipoda, Crustacea). Belgian Journal of Zoology 134: 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleuter, M., A. Schleuter, S. Potel & M. Banning, 1994. Dikerogammarus haemobaphes (Eichwald, 1841) (Gammaridae) aus der Donau erreicht über den Main-Donau-Kanal den Main. Lauterbornia 21: 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thioulouse, J., S. Dolédec, D. Chessel & J. M. Olivier, 1997. ADE software: multivariate analysis and graphical display of environmental data, Software per 1’Ambiente, Guariso G. & A. Rizzoli (eds), Bologna: 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittizer, T., 1996. Vorkommen und Ausbreitung aquatischer Neozoen (Makrozoobenthos) in den Bundeswasserstrassen. In Gebhardt, H., R. Kinzelbach & S. Schmidt-Fischer (eds), Gebietsfremde Tierarten — Auswirkungen auf einheimische Arten, Lebensgemeinschaften und Biotope — Situationsanalyse: 49–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittizer, T. & M. Banning, 2000. Biological assessment in the Danube catchment area: indications of shifts in species composition induced by human activities. European Water Management 3: 35–45.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tittizer, T., F. Schöll, M. Banning, A. Haybach & M. Schleuter, 2000. Aquatische Neozoen im Makrozoobenthos der Binnenwasserstrassen Deutschlands. Lauterbornia 39: 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usseglio-Polatera, Ph. & J. N. Beisel, 2002a. Traitement des résultats du monitoring international de la faune de macroinvertébrés de la Meuse, 108 pp. Rapport C.I.P.M.-I.C.B.M., Palais des Congrès, Liège.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usseglio-Polatera, Ph. & J. N. Beisel, 2002b. Longitudinal changes in macroinvertebrate assemblages in the Meuse River: anthropogenic effects versus natural change. River Research and Applications 18: 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanden Bossche, J.-P., E. Delooz & F. Grisez, 1999. Macroinvertébrés benthiques et qualité biologique de la Meuse wallonne en 1998. Centre de Recherche de la Nature, des Forêts et du Bois. D.G.R.N.E. Ministère de la Région wallonne. Gembloux, 60 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanden Bossche, J.-P., 2002. First records and fast spread of five new (1995–2000) alien species in the River Meuse in Belgium: Hypania invalida, Corbicula fluminea, Hemimysis anomala, Dikerogammarus villosus and Crangonyx pseudogracilis. Bulletin de 1’Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique Biologic, 72(Suppl.): 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, F. W. B., G. van der Velde & A. bij de Vaate, 1993. Ecological aspects, explosive range extension and impact of a mass invader, Corophium curvispinum Sars, 1895 (Crustacea, Amphipoda) in the lower Rhine (the Netherlands). Oecologia 93: 224–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Velde, G., I. Nagelkerken, S. Rajagopal & A. bij de Vaate, 2002. Invasions by alien species in inland freshwater bodies in Western Europe: the Rhine delta. In Leppä koski, E., S. Gollasch & S. Olenin (eds), Invasive aquatic species of Europe. Distribution, impacts and management. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht: 360–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Velde, G., S. Rajagopal, F. W. B. van den Brink, B. Kelleher, B. G. P. Paffen, A. J. Kempers & A. bij de Vaate, 1998. Ecological impact of an exotic invasion in the River Rhine. In Nienhuis, P. H., R. S. E. W. Leuven & A. M. J. Ragas (eds), New concepts for sustainable management of river basins, 159–169. Backhuys Publ., Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vereertsraeten, J., 1971. Le bassin de la Meuse, étude de géographie hydrologique. Revue belge de Géographie 94: 1–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volz, J., H. Ketelaars & A. Wagenvoort, 2002. Cinquante années d’évolution de la qualité de 1’eau de la Meuse — un aperçu. H2O 3: 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, M. & A. Fitter, 1996. The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77: 1661–1666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, K. A., 1985. Corophium curvispinum Sars, 1895 (Amphipoda) in the River Meuse, Belgium. Crustaceana 48:218–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, K., 2002. On the distribution of alien non-marine and estuarine macro-crustaceans in Belgium. Bulletin de 1’Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Biologie 72(Suppl).: 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Josens, G. et al. (2005). Native and exotic Amphipoda and other Peracarida in the River Meuse: new assemblages emerge from a fast changing fauna. In: Segers, H., Martens, K. (eds) Aquatic Biodiversity II. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 180. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4111-X_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics