A Weighted Referential Activity Dictionary

  • Wilma Bucci
  • Bernard Maskit
Part of the The Information Retrieval Series book series (INRE, volume 20)


The Weighted Referential Activity Dictionary (WRAD) is a dictionary (word list) containing 696 items, with weights ranging between −1 and +1, used for computer modeling of a psycholinguistic variable, Referential Activity (RA), in spoken and written language. The RA dimension concerns the degree to which language reflects connection to nonverbal experience, including imagery, and bodily and emotional experience, and evokes corresponding experience in the listener or reader. RA is primarily indicated by attributes of language style independent of content. High RA language is vivid and evocative; low RA language may be abstract, general, vague or diffuse. RA ratings have been widely used in psycholinguistic and clinical research. RA was initially measured using scales scored by judges; the CRA (Mergenthaler and Bucci, 1999), a binary dictionary, was the first computerized RA measure developed to model judges’ RA ratings. The WRAD, a weighted dictionary, shows higher correlations with RA ratings in all text types tested. The development of the WRAD and its applications are made possible by the authors’ Discourse Attributes Analysis Program (DAAP), which uses smooth local weighted averaging to capture the ebb and flow of RA and similar variables.


referential activity weighted dictionary multiple code theory narrative analysis expression of affect linguistic style 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

4. Bibliography

  1. Bucci, W. (1995) The power of the narrative; A multiple code account. In Pennebaker, J. (Ed.) Emotion, Disclosure and Health. 93–122. American Psychological Association Books, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Bucci, W. (1997) Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Science: A multiple code theory. Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bucci, W. (2002) Referential Activity (RA): Scales and computer procedures. In Fonagy et al. (Eds.) An Open Door Review of Outcome Studies in Psychoanalysis; Second Edition. 192–195. International Psychoanalytical Association, London.Google Scholar
  4. Bucci, W., Kabasakalian, R., and the Referential Activity Research Group. (1992) Instructions for scoring Referential Activity (RA) in transcripts of spoken narrative texts. Ulmer Textbank, Ulm, Germany.Google Scholar
  5. Bucci, W. and Maskit, B. (In preparation) Linking words and things: Measurement and linguistic features of Referential Activity.Google Scholar
  6. Didion, J. (1998) Last Words. The New Yorker, November 9. 74–80.Google Scholar
  7. Maskit, B., Bucci, W. and Roussos, A.J. (In preparation) Capturing the flow of verbal interaction — the Discourse Attributes Analysis Program.Google Scholar
  8. Mergenthaler, E. (1985) Textbank Systems: Computer science applied in the field of psychoanalysis. Springer, Heidelberg & New York.Google Scholar
  9. Mergenthaler, E. (1998) CM — the Cycles Model software. (Version 1.0) Universität Ulm, Germany.Google Scholar
  10. Mergenthaler, E. and Bucci, W. (1999) Linking verbal and nonverbal representations: Computer analysis of Referential Activity. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 72, 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wilma Bucci
    • 1
  • Bernard Maskit
    • 2
  1. 1.Derner InstituteAdelphi UniversityGarden CityUSA
  2. 2.Mathematics DepartmentStony Brook UniversityStony Brook

Personalised recommendations