Skip to main content

A note on the Berlin Brain-Computer Interface

  • Conference paper

Summary

This paper discusses machine learning methods and their application to Brain-Computer Interfacing. A particular focus is placed on linear classification methods which can be applied in the BCI context. Finally, we provide an overview on the Berlin-Brain Computer Interface (BBCI).

The studies were partly supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), FKZ 01IBB02A and FKZ and FKZ 01IBB02B, by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), FOR 375/B1 and the PASCAL Network of Excellence, EU #506778. Thispaper is based on excerpts of [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Klaus-Robert Müller, Matthias Krauledat, Guido Dornhege, Gabriel Curio, and Benjamin Blankertz, “Machine learning techniques for brain-computer interfaces,” Biomed. Technik, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jonathan R. Wolpaw, Niels Birbaumer, Dennis J. McFarland, Gert Pfurtscheller, and Theresa M. Vaughan, “Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control,” Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 113, pp. 767–791, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J.R. Wolpaw, N. Birbaumer, William J. Heetderks, D.J. McFarland, P. Hunter Peckham, G. Schalk, E. Donchin, Louis A. Quatrano, C.J. Robinson, and T.M. Vaughan, “Braincomputer interface technology: A review of the first international meeting,” IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 164–173, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrea Kübler, Boris Kotchoubey, Jochen Kaiser, Jonathan Wolpaw, and Niels Birbaumer, “Brain-computer communication: Unlocking the locked in,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 358–375, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eleanor A. Curran and Maria J. Stokes, “Learning to control brain activity: A review of the production and control of EEG components for driving brain-computer interface (BCI) systems,” Brain Cogn., vol. 51, pp. 326–336, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Matthias Krauledat, Guido Dornhege, Benjamin Blankertz, Gabriel Curio, and Klaus-Robert Müller, “The berlin brain-computer interface for rapid response,” Biomed. Technik, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 61–62, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.R. Wolpaw, D.J. McFarland, and T.M. Vaughan, “Brain-computer interface research at the Wadsworth Center,” IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 222–226, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Birbaumer, N. Ghanayim, T. Hinterberger, I. Iversen, B. Kotchoubey, A. Kübler, J. Perelmouter, E. Taub, and H. Flor, “A spelling device for the paralysed,” Nature, vol. 398, pp. 297–298, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K.R. Müller, S. Mika, G. Rätsch, K. Tsuda, and B. Schölkopf, “An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 181–201, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S.S. Haykin, Adaptive Filter Theory, Prentice Hall, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klaus-Robert Müller, Charles W. Anderson, and Gary E. Birch, “Linear and non-linear methods for brain-computer interfaces,” IEEE Trans. Neural Sys. Rehab. Eng., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 165–169, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Benjamin Blankertz, Gabriel Curio, and Klaus-Robert Müller, “Classifying single trial EEG: Towards brain computer interfacing,” in Advances in Neural Inf. Proc. Systems (NIPS 01), T. G. Diettrich, S. Becker, and Z. Ghahramani, Eds., 2002, vol. 14, pp. 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Benjamin Blankertz, Guido Dornhege, Christin Schäfer, Roman Krepki, Jens Kohlmorgen, Klaus-Robert Müller, Volker Kunzmann, Florian Losch, and Gabriel Curio, “Boosting bit rates and error detection for the classification of fast-paced motor commands based on single-trial EEG analysis,” IEEE Trans. Neural Sys. Rehab. Eng., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 127–131, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R.O. Duda, P.E. Hart, and D.G. Stork, Pattern classification, John Wiley & Sons, second edition, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V.N. Vapnik, The nature of statistical learning theory, Springer Verlag, New York, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. R.A. Fisher, “The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems,” Annals of Eugenics, vol. 7, pp. 179–188, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Fukunaga, Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition, Academic Press, San Diego, 2nd edition, 1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Mika, G. Rätsch, and K.-R. Müller, “A mathematical programming approach to the kernel Fisher algorithm,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, T.K. Leen, T.G. Dietterich, and V. Tresp, Eds. 2001, vol. 13, pp. 591–597, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Mika, G. Rätsch, J Weston, B. Schölkopf, A. Smola, and K.-R. Müller, “Constructing descriptive and discriminative non-linear features: Rayleigh coefficients in kernel feature spaces,” IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 623–628, May 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Poggio and F. Girosi, “Regularization algorithms for learning that are equivalent to multilayer networks,” Science, vol. 247, pp. 978–982, 1990.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. G. Orr and K.-R. Müller, Eds., Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, vol. 1524, Springer LNCS, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Rätsch, T. Onoda, and K.-R. Müller, “Soft margins for AdaBoost,” Machine Learning, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 287–320, Mar. 2001, also NeuroCOLT Technical Report NC-TR-1998-021.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Guido Dornhege, Benjamin Blankertz, Gabriel Curio, and Klaus-Robert Müller, “Increase information transfer rates in BCI by CSP extension to multi-class,” in Advances in Neural Inf. Proc. Systems (NIPS 03), 2004, vol. 16, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guido Dornhege, Benjamin Blankertz, Gabriel Curio, and Klaus-Robert Müller, “Boosting bit rates in non-invasive EEG single-trial classifications by feature combination and multi-class paradigms,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 993–1002, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Matthias Krauledat, Guido Dornhege, Benjamin Blankertz, Florian Losch, Gabriel Curio, and Klaus-Robert Müller, “Improving speed and accuracy of brain-computer interfaces using readiness potential features,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference IEEE EMBS on Biomedicine, San Francisco, 2004, accepted.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R.Q. Cui, D. Huter, W. Lang, and L. Deecke, “Neuroimage of voluntary movement: topography of the Bereitschaftspotential, a 64-channel DC current source density study,” Neuroimage, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 124–134, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. W. Lang, O. Zilch, C. Koska, G. Lindinger, and L. Deecke, “Negative cortical DC shifts preceding and accompanying simple and complex sequential movements,” Exp. Brain Res., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 99–104, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Roman Krepki, Benjamin Blankertz, Gabriel Curio, and Klaus-Robert Müller, “The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface (BBCI): towards a new communication channel for online control in gaming applications,” Journal of Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2004, invited contribution.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gert Pfurtscheller and F.H. Lopes da Silva, “Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles,” Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 1842–1857, Nov 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roman Krepki, Benjamin Blankertz, Gabriel Curio, and Klaus-Robert Müller, “The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface (BBCI): towards a new communication channel for online control of multimedia applications and computer games,” in 9th International Conference on Distributed Multimedia Systems (DMS’03), 2003, pp. 237–244.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Müller, K.R., Krauledat, M., Dornhege, G., Jähnichen, S., Curio, G., Blankertz, B. (2006). A note on the Berlin Brain-Computer Interface. In: Hommel, G., Huanye, S. (eds) Human Interaction with Machines. Springer, Dordrecht . https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4043-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4043-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4042-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4043-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics