5. Summary
Mathematical precision and rigour without conceptual clarity was for von Neumann neither possible nor desirable either in physical sciences or in mathematics. It seems justified to say that what drove von Neumann in his research, especially in physics, was the desire to achieve conceptual clarity and formulate conceptually consistent theories. Von Neumann’s work on quantum mechanics and especially his abandoning the Hilbert space formalism corroborates this interpretation to a large extent. In arriving at acceptable theories von Neumann was relying on the method of an opportunistically interpreted soft axiomatics, a method of axiomatisation which was not affected by Gödel’s results. Von Neumann himself, when speaking of the method in physics, emphasized that the aim of theoretical physics is to create mathematical models. His success in creating powerful mathematical models in physics was due to his unparalleled skill and talent in combining algebraic-combinatorial techniques with analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bell, J.S. (1987), Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press.
Feynman, R. (1965), The Character of Physical Law, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Halmos, P. (1973), “The Legend of John von Neumann” in: American Mathematical Monthly 50, 382–394.
Hilbert, D. (1899), Grundlagen der Geometrie, Teubner, Leipzig (English translation: Foundations of Geometry, Open Court, La Salle, IL, 1971).
Hilbert, D., Nordheim, L. and J. von Neumann (1926), “Über die Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik” in: von Neumann (1962/I), 104–133.
Majer, U. (2001), “The Axiomatic Method and the Foundations of Science: Historical Roots of Mathematical Physics in Göttingen (1900–1930)” in: Rédei, Stöltzner (2001), 11–33.
Rédei, M. (1996), “Why John von Neumann Did Not Like the Hilbert Space Formalism of Quantum Mechanics (and What He Liked Instead)” in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27, 493–510.
Rédei, M. (1998), Quantum Logic in Algebraic Approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Rédei, M. (1999), “Unsolved Problems in Mathematics’ J. von Neumann’s Address to the International Congress of Mathematicians, Amsterdam, September 2–9, 1954” in: The Mathematical Intelligencer 21, 7–12.
Rédei, M. (2001), “John von Neumann’s Concept of Quantum Logic and Quantum Probability” in: Rédei, Stöltzner (2001), 153–172.
Rédei, M. and M. Stöltzner (eds.) (2001), John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 8), Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Stöltzner, M. (2001), “Opportunistic Axiomatics: John von Neumann on the Methodology of Mathematical Physics” in: Rédei, Stöltzner (2001), 35–62.
Stöltzner, M. (2002a), “How Metaphysical is ‘Deepening the Foundations’ — Hahn and Frank on Hilbert’s Axiomatic Method” in: M. Heidelberger and F. Stadler (eds.) (2002), History of Philosophy of Science. New Trends and Perspectives, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 245–262.
Stöltzner, M. (2002b), “Bell, Bohm, and von Neumann: Some Philosophical Inequalities Concerning No-go Theorems and the Axiomatic Method” in: T. Placek and J. Butterfield (eds.) (2002), Modality, Probability, and Bell’s Theorem, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 37–58.
Thirring, W. (2001), “J. v. Neumann’s Influence in Mathematical Physics” in: Rédei, Stöltzner (2001), 5–10.
von Neumann, J. (1927a), “Mathematische Begründung der Quantenmechanik”, Göttinger Nachrichten, 1–57; in: von Neumann (1962/I), 151–207.
von Neumann, J. (1927b), “Wahrscheinlichkeitstheoretischer Aufbau der Quantenmechanik”, Göttinger Nachrichten, 245–272; in: von Neumann (1962/I), 208–235.
von Neumann, J. (1927c), “Thermodynamik quantenmechanischer Gesamtheiten”, Göttinger Nachrichten, 245–272; in: von Neumann (1962/I), 236–254.
von Neumann, J. (1932), Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg (English translation by R. T. Beyer, Princeton Universtity Press, 1955).
von Neumann, J. (1937), “Quantum Logics (Strict-and Probability Logics)”, unfinished manuscript, John von Neumann Archive, Libarary of Congress, Washington, D.C., reviewed by A. H. Taub in: von Neumann (1962/IV), 195–197.
von Neumann, J. (1961/VI), Collected Works Vol. VI. Theory of Games, Astrophysics, Hydrodynamics and Meteorology, A.H. Taub (ed.), Pergamon Press, Oxford.
von Neumann, J. (1961a), “Method in the Physical Sciences” in: von Neumann (1961/VI), 491–498.
von Neumann, J. (1961b), “The Role of Mathematics in the Sciences and in Society” in: von Neumann (1961/VI), 477–490.
von Neumann, J. (1962/I), Collected Works Vol. I. Logic, Theory of Sets and Quantum Mechanics, A.H. Taub (ed.), Pergamon Press, Oxford.
von Neumann, J. (1962a), “The Mathematician” in: von Neumann (1962/I), 1–9.
von Neumann, J. (1962b), “Die Axiomatisierung der Mengenlehre” in: von Neumann (1962/I), 339–422.
von Neumann, J. (1962/IV), Collected Works Vol. IV. Continuous Geometry and Other Topics, A.H. Taub (ed.), Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Weyl, H. (1944), “David Hilbert and his Mathematical Work” in: Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 50, 612–654.
Wightman, A.S. (1976), “Hilbert’s Sixth Problem” in: Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics 28, AMS, 147–240.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rédei, M., Stöltzner, M. (2006). Soft Axiomatisation: John von Neumann on Method and von Neumann’s Method in the Physical Sciences. In: Carson, E., Huber, R. (eds) Intuition and the Axiomatic Method. The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 70. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4040-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4040-7_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4039-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4040-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)