Abstract
I begin with an account of what is deserved in human ethics, an ethics that assumes without argument that only humans, or rational agents, count morally. I then take up the question of whether nonhuman living beings are also deserving and answer it in the affirmative. Having established that all individual living beings, as well as ecosystems, are deserving, I go on to establish what it is that they deserve and then compare the requirements of global justice when only humans are taken into account with the requirements of global justice when all living beings are taken into account.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sterba, J.P. (2005). Global Justice for Humans or for All Living Beings and What Difference it Makes. In: Brock, G., Moellendorf, D. (eds) Current Debates in Global Justice. Studies in Global Justice, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3847-X_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3847-X_14
Received:
Accepted:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3347-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3847-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)