Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
10.1 References
Aikenhead, G. (2000). Renegotiating the culture of school science. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education (pp. 245–264). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books.
Bordieu, P., & Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cobern, W. W. (Ed.) (1998). Sociocultural perspectives on science education: An international dialogue. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1155–1173). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Ernest, P. (1995). Constructivism: The one and the many. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 459–486). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fullan, M. G. (1993). Change forces. London: The Falmer Press.
Garrison, J. (1995). Deweyan pragmatism and the epistemology of contemporary social constructivism. American Education Research Journal, 32(4), 716–40.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. London: Sage.
Halliday, M. A., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: The Falmer Press.
Kawasaki, K. (2002). A cross-cultural comparison of English and Japanese linguistic assumptions influencing pupils’ learning of science. Canadian and International Education, 31(1), 19–51.
Klein, E. (1971). Klein’s comprehensive etymological dictionary of the English language. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Kragh, H. (1998). Social constructivism, the gospel of science and the teaching of physics. Science and Education, 7(3), 231–43.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Pinar, W. F., & Reynolds, W. M. (Eds.). (1992). Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Roth, W. M., & Roychoudary, A. (1994). Physics student’ epistemologies and views about knowing and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 5–30.
Seitz, J. E. (1999). Motives for metaphor: Literacy, curriculum reform, and the teaching of English. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Settelmaier, E., & Taylor, P. C. (2001, July). Bridging the gap: Integral philosophy and educational research in the seventh moment. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australasian Association for Educational Research, Fremantle, WA.
Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum development in the postmodern era. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.
Spivey, N. N. (1997). The constructivist metaphor. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P.W. (Eds.) (2000). Radical constructivism in action: Building on the pioneering work of Ernst von Glasersfeld. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Sutton, C. (1993). Figuring out a scientific understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1215–1227.
Taylor, P.C. (1998). Constructivism: Value added. In B.J. Fraser and K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1111–1123). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Taylor, P.C., & Cobern, W.W. (1998). Towards a critical science education. In W.W. Cobern (Ed.), Socio-cultural perspectives on science education: An international dialogue (pp. 203–207). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tobin, K. (1990). Metaphors and images in teaching. Perth, WA: Key Centre for School Science and Mathematics, Curtin University of Technology.
Tobin, K.G. (1993). The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington: AAAS Press.
Wilber, K. (1999). Integral psychology. Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications.
Willison, J.W. (2000). Classroom factors affecting student scientific literacy: Impressionistic tales and their interpretation using a metaphoric framework. Unpublished Doctoral thesis. Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Willison, J.W., Taylor, P.C. (2006). Complementary Epistemologies of Science Teaching. In: Aubusson, P.J., Harrison, A.G., Ritchie, S.M. (eds) Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3829-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3830-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)