This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
5.1 References
Boulter, C. J., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Constructing a typology of models for science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 41–57). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75, 649–672.
Duit, R., & Glynn, S. (1996). Mental modelling. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in Science education in Europe: current issues and themes (pp. 166–176). London: Falmer.
Duncan, A. (1996). Laws and Order in Eighteenth-Century Chemistry. Oxford: Clarendon.
Ealy, J. B. (1999). A student evaluation of molecular modeling in first year college chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 309–321.
Erduran, S. (2001). Philosophy of chemistry: an emerging field with implications for chemistry Education. Science & Education, 10, 581–593.
Francoeur, E. (1997). The forgotten tool: The design and use of molecular models. Social Studies of Science, 27, 7–40.
Francoeur, E. (2000). Beyond dematerialization and inscription: Does the materiality of molecular models really matter? HYLE — An International Journal of the Philosophy of Chemistry, 6, 52–69.
Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 548–554.
Gilbert, J., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M. (1998). Models in explanations, Part 1: Horses for courses? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 83–97..
Hodson, D. (1992). In search of a meaningful relationship: an exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 541–562.
Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 701–705.
Justi, R. (1997). Models in the teaching of chemical kinetics. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Reading: The University of Reading.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (1999). History and philosophy of science through models: The case of chemical kinetics. Science & Education, 8, 287–307.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (2002). Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modelling, implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 369–387.
Kozma, R. B. & Russel, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 949–968.
Laidler, K. J. (1995). The world of physical chemistry (2nd. ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laidler, K. J., & King, M. C. (1983). The development of transition-state theory, Journal of Physical Chemistry, 87, 2657–2664.
Levere, T. H. (1971) Affinity and matter–elements of chemical philosophy 1800–1865. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mainzer, K. (1999). Computational models and virtual reality. New perspectives of research in chemistry. HYLE — An International Journal of the Philosophy of Chemistry, 5, 117–126.
Mellor, J. W. (1904). Chemical statics and dynamics. London: Longmans Green.
Morrison, M., & Morgan, M. S. (1999). Models as mediating instruments. In M. S. Morgan, & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators (pp. 10–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nersessian, N. J. (1999). Model-based reasoning in conceptual change. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 5–22). New York: Kluwer and Plenum Publishers.
Reiner, M., & Gilbert, J. (2000). Epistemological resources for thought experimentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 489–506.
Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349–363.
Tomasi, J. (1988). Models and modeling in theoretical chemistry. Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem), 179, 273–292.
Treagust, D. F., & Chittleborough, G. (2001). Chemistry: A matter of understanding representations. In Brophy, J. (Ed.), Subject-specific instructional methods and activities. (pp.239–267). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Wu, H-K, Krajcik, J.S. & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students’ use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 821–842.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Justi, R., Gilbert, J. (2006). The Role of Analog Models in the Understanging of the Nature of Models in Chemistry. In: Aubusson, P.J., Harrison, A.G., Ritchie, S.M. (eds) Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3829-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3830-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)