Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Empowered for Action? How Do Young People Relate to Environmental Challenges?

  • Chapter
Beyond Cartesian Dualism

Part of the book series: Science & Technology Education Library ((CTISE,volume 29))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (1996). Introduction to research in education. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (1997). Foundation of futures studies. Human science for a new era. London: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bø, I. (1999). Hadde ungdom det bedre før? En sammenlikning av ungdoms opplevelse av psykososiale problemer i 1959 og 1994 [Were youth doing better before? A comparison of youth’s perception of psychosocial problems in 1959 and 1994] (Vol. 29). Stavanger: Høgskolen i Stavanger, Informasjonsenheten [Stavanger University College].

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, E. (1988). Building a global civic culture: Education for an interdependent world. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunstad, P. O. (2002). Longing for belonging: Youth culture in Norway. In J. Gidley & S. Inayatullah (Eds.), Youth futures. Comparative research and transformative visions. London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (1987). Australian attitudes to science and technology and the future: The Australian Commission for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (2002). Future visions, social realities, and private lives: Young people and their personal well-being. In J. Gidley & S. Inayatullah (Eds.), Youth futures. Comparative research and transformative visions. London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (1997). Young people and social change: Individualization and risk in late modernity. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable, R. K., & Wolf, M. B. (1993). Instrument development in the affective domain. Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidley, J., & Inayatullah, S. (Eds.). (2002). Youth futures. Comparative research and transformative visions. London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, S. (1997). Futures in the class room—Student’s viewpoints. Paper presented at the World Futures Studies Federation XVth World Conference, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbroner, R. (1995). Visions of the future. The distant past, yesterday, today, tomorrow. New York, Oxford: The New York Public Library and Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellevik, O. (1996). Nordmenn og det gode liv [Norwegians and the good life]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellevik, O. (2002). Forskningsmetode i sosiologi og statsvitenskap [Research method in sociology and political science]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget [Scandinavian University Press].

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (1996). Envisioning the future: The challenge for environmental educators. Environmental Education Research, 2(1), 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D., & Holden, C. (1995). Visions of the future, why we need to teach for tomorrow. Staffordshire: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D., & Slaughter, R. (Eds.). (1998). Futures Education. World Yearbook of Education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan, P. M., DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2003). Wording Effects in Self-Esteem Scales: Methodological artifact or response style? Structural Equation Modelling, 10(3), 435–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. W. (1994). Public understanding of science and science education for action. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(6), 601–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungk, R., & Müllert, N. R. (1987). Future workshops: How to create desirable futures. London: Institute for Social Inventions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klafki, W. (2001). Dannelsesteori og didaktik—nye studier (Original: Neue Studien zur Bildungstheorie und Didaktik). Århus: Klim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D., & Wallace, J. (2004). Imaging the future of science education: The case of making futures studies explicit in student learning. Studies in Science Education, 40, 139–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psycology, 70(4), 810–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Øia, T. (1995). Apolitisk ungdom? Sjølbergingsgenerasjonen og politiske verdier [Apolitical youth? The self-rescuing generation and political values]. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag a.s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J. A. (1998). Environmental education in the 21st century. Theory, practice, progress and promise. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A. (2000). Growing up in social transition: In search of a late-modernity identity. Doctoral thesis, University of Turku, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, C. (2004). Report on organizing the ROSE survey in Norway, Oslo. Available from: http://www.ils.uio.no/forskning/rose/ [access 2005-08-03].

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, C., Henriksen, E. K., & Hansen, P. J. K. (2005). Climate education—Empowering today’s youth to meet tomorrow’s challenges. Studies in Science Education, 41, 3–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE. Background, Rationale, Questionnaire Development and Data Collection for ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education)—a comparative study of students’ views of science and science education (4/2004). Oslo: Department of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjåk, K. K., & Bøyum, B. (1993). Undersøking om verdier, natur og miljø 1993 [Attitudes towards the environment 1993] (NSD report no 100). Bergen: ISSP (The International Social Survey Programme) and NSD (Norsk sammfunnsvitenskapelig datatjeneste).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapp, W., Wals, A. E. J., & Stankorb, S. L. (1996). Environmental education for empowerment: Action research & community problem solving. Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (Ed.). (1974). Learning For tomorrow. The role of the future in education. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, W. (1989). Envisioning the future: A mindbook of exercises for futures-inventors. Denver, CO: Futures Invention Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziehe, T., & Stubenrauch, H. (1993). Ny ungdom og usædvanlige læreprocesser: kulturel frisættelse og subjektivitet (Originally published as: Plädoyer für ungewöhnliches Lernen, Ideen zur Jugendsituation, 1982). København: Politisk Revy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Teacher Training and School Development, University of Oslo, Norway

    Camilla Schreiner & Svein Sjøberg

Authors
  1. Camilla Schreiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Svein Sjøberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, USA

    William W. Cobern

  2. City University of New York, N.Y., USA

    Ken Tobin

  3. University College of Education of Winneba, Ghana

    Henry Brown-Acquay

  4. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain

    Mariona Espinet

  5. Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Gurol Irzik

  6. The Open University, Hong Kong

    Olugbemiro Jegede

  7. Universidad Autónoma de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia

    Lilia Reyes Herrera

  8. College of Science, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Marrisa Rollnick

  9. University of Oslo, Norway

    Svein Sjøberg

  10. National Changhua University of Education, Taiwan

    Hsiao-lin Tuan

  11. York University, Toronto, Canada

    Steve Alsop

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schreiner, C., Sjøberg, S. (2005). Empowered for Action? How Do Young People Relate to Environmental Challenges?. In: Cobern, W.W., et al. Beyond Cartesian Dualism. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3808-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation