Skip to main content

Scientific Knowledge and Participation in the Governance of Fisheries in the North Sea

  • Chapter
Book cover Participation in Fisheries Governance

Abstract

The participatory mode of fisheries governance is based on effective communications that are able to bring together the viewpoints of many stakeholders so that management decisions can be generated. This chapter offers a discussion of the relationship between stakeholder participation as it is taking place on a European scale and the generation of formal scientific knowledge for the management of fish stocks under the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). It examines the demersal stocks in the North Sea in particular. Stakeholder participation has been an important factor leading to demands for changes on the ways in which formal scientific advice is generated and communicated. The impacts on scientific deliberations of three such demands are examined: a) a demand that advice shift from the fish stock to the fishery as its basic unit of reference; b) a demand that advice not be open to different interpretation by the various stakeholders; and c) a demand that the results of existing technical fisheries management measures be examined when preparing advice. The chapter concludes that a flatter decision making hierarchy could make possible both a richer knowledge base and greater public support for management decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bernstein, BB and Iudicello, S (2000) National Evaluation of Cooperative Data Gathering Efforts in Fisheries: A Report to the National Marine Fisheries Service, National Fisheries Conservation Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H and Pinch, T (1998) The Golem: What You Should Know about Science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L, Shachter, S and Back, S (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups, Stanford: Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, WR, Frickel, S and Gramling, R (1995) ‘Beyond the nature/society divide: learning to think about a mountain’ Sociological Forum 10(3):361–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, TF (1983) ‘Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists’ American Sociological Review 48:781–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guston, DH (2001) ‘Toward a ‘best practice’ of constructing’ servicable truths’” in M Hisschemoller, R Hopper, WN Dunn & JR Ravetz (eds) Knowledge, Power and Participation in Environmental Policy and Risk Assessment, New Brunswick NJ, Transaction Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume I Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Boston, Beacon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume II Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reasoning, Boston, Beacon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J and Nielsen, TH (1990) ‘Jurgen Habermas: Morality, society, and ethics-an interview with Torben Hviid Nielsen’ Acta Sociologia 33:93–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology, Cambridge, Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • ICES [International Council for the Exploration of the Sea] (2003a) ACFM Annual Report, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • ICES [International Council for the Exploration of the Sea] (2003b) Report of the Study Group on the Development of Fishery-based Forecasts, ICES CM 2003/ACFM:08 Ref. D

    Google Scholar 

  • ICES [International Council for the Exploration of the Sea] (2003c) Report of the Working Group on the Assessment of Demersal Stocks in the North Sea and Skagerrak, ICES CM 2003/ACFM:02

    Google Scholar 

  • ICES [International Council for the Exploration of the Sea] (2004) Working Group for Fishery Systems (WGFS) Annual Report, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S (2002) ‘Citizens at risk: cultures of modernity in the US and EU’ Science as Culture 2(3):363–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B (1987) Science in Action, Cambridge, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, DK and Ditton, RB (1993) ‘Distributive justice in fisheries management’ Fisheries 18(2):14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, A (1986) The Fisherman’s Problem, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, RK (1968) ‘Science and democratic social structure’ in RK Merton (ed.) Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E (1990) Governing the Commons, New York, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, MJ (1993) ‘International fisheries management’ in PM Haas, RO Keohane and MA Levy (Eds) Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection, Cambridge, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, TM (1995) Trust in Numbers: the Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, AA, Fogarty, MJ, Sissenwine, MP, Beddington, JR and Shepherd, JG (1993) ‘Achieving sustainable use of renewable resources’ Science 262:828–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozwadowski, HM (2002) The Sea Knows No Boundaries: A Century of Marine Science under ICES, Copenhagan Denmark, The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R (1995) Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks CA, Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • STECF [Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries] (2003) Plenary Report #17, European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S (1988) The Recent Work of Jurgen Habermas: Reason, Justice and Modernity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, DC (1999) ‘Fisheries science collaborations: the critical role of the community’, a keynote presentation at the Conference on Holistic Management and the Role of Fisheries and Mariculture in the Coastal Community, November, Tjärnö Marine Biological Laboratory, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, DC and McCay, BJ (1998) ‘A governance model for environmental policy’, presented at Crossing Boundaries, The Seventh Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Vancouver BC, 10–14 June

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, DC and Jentoft, S (1999) ‘Structure, agency and embeddedness: sociological approaches to fisheries management institutions’ in D Symes (ed) Alternative Management Systems for Fisheries, Oxford, Blackwell Science

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, DC (2000) ‘Fisheries Management as a Social Problem’ in C Sheppard (ed) Seas at the Millennium Vol III, London, Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DC, McCay, Bonnie J, Rowan, V and Grandin, B (2002) ‘Institutional differences among marine fisheries scientists’ views of their working conditions, discipline, and fisheries management’ Fisheries 27(8):14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, DC and Degnbol, P (2002) ‘The effects of legal mandates on fisheries science deliberations: the case of Atlantic Bluefish in the United States’ Fisheries Research 58:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, DC (2003) ‘Conflict and scale: a defence of community approaches in fisheries management’ in DC Wilson, JR Nielsen and P Degnbol (eds) The Fisheries Co-management Experience: Accomplishments, Challenges and Prospects, Dordrecht The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, D.C., Delaney, A.E. (2005). Scientific Knowledge and Participation in the Governance of Fisheries in the North Sea. In: Gray, T.S. (eds) Participation in Fisheries Governance. Reviews: Methods and Technologies in Fish Biology and Fisheries, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3778-3_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics