Skip to main content

Economic Progress in the Countryside, Forests, and Public Policy

Some Lessons from Ecuador and Chile

  • Chapter
Environmental Issues in Latin America and the Caribbean

Abstract

Recent contributions to the literature on the causes of tropical deforestation indicate that, under certain circumstances, agricultural intensification (i.e., raising crop and livestock yields) can accelerate farmers and ranchers’ encroachment on tree-covered land. We contend, however, that the linkage between intensification and habitat conservation is generally positive. Chilean experience during the 1980s and 1990s is a good example. Domestic and foreign demand for agricultural output increased substantially. But because of productivity improvements, agricultural land use fell; the forested portion of the national territory rose from 19 percent in 1990 to 24 percent in 1998. In contrast, large tracts of forests have been converted into cropland and pasture in Ecuador during the last two decades. Productivity-enhancing investment having been very deficient, agricultural land use increased at a 2 percent annual rate during the 1980s and continued to expand in the 1990s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bebbington, A. and Sotomayor, O., 1998, Agricultural extension in Chile, in: Financing the Future, J. Beynton, ed., Oxford Policy Management, pp. 106–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, H. and Deacon, R., 2000, Ownership risk, investment, and the use of natural resources, Am. Econ. R. 90:526–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, R., 1981, The colonization of humid tropical areas in Ecuador, Singapore J. Tropical Geog. 2:15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., 1991, Radical reformism in Chile, in: Searching for Agrarian Reform in Latin America, W. Thiesenhusen, ed., Unwin Hyman, pp. 216–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • ComisiĂłn Nacional de Riego, 2001, La polĂ­tica de riego nacional (11 October 2002),;http://www.chileriego.cl/cuerpo.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creceda, L. and Dahse, F., 1980, Dos dĂ©cadas de cambios en el agro chileno, Instituto de SociologĂ­a, Pontificia Universidad CatĂłlica de Chile, Santiago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, J., 1988, La fruticultura de exportaciĂłn, ColecciĂłn de Estudios de CIEPLAN 25:79–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H., Wheeler, D., 2002, Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve, J. Econ. Perspectives 16:147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaimowitz, D. and Angelsen, A., 1998, Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, pp. 7–14 and 92–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaimowitz, D. and Smith, J., 2001, Soybean technology and the loss of natural vegetation in Brazil and Bolivia, in: Agricultural Technologies and Tropical Deforestation, A. Angelsen and D. Kaimowitz, eds., CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp. 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, C., 1996, GlobalizaciĂłn, agricultura tradicional y reconversiĂłn en Chile, Comercio Exterior 46:625–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, C., 1998, The agrarian question and the peasantry in the Chilean democratic transition, Institute of Social Studies, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oficina de Estudios y PolĂ­ticas Agrarias (ODEPA), 2001, Compendio EstadĂ­stico Silvoagropecuario 1999–2000, Santiago, pp. 69 and 160.

    Google Scholar 

  • PichĂłn, F., 1997, Colonist land allocation decisions, Econ. Devt. and Cultural Change 45:707–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • SepĂşveda, C. and Verscheure, H., no date, Tree plantations, ComitĂ© Nacional Pro-Defensa de la Fauna y Flora and Friends of the Earth-Chile, Santiago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D., Sedjo, R., and Reid, J., 1996, Valuing biodiversity, J. Pol. Econ. 104:163–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, D., 1998, Tropical Forest Conservation, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 128–129, 141, and 147–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, D., Salazar-Canelos, C., Camacho-Saa, C. and Stewart, R., 2000, Markets, institutions, and forestry, World Devt. 28:2005–2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, D. and Whitaker, M., 1994, Economic Progress and the Environment, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweeten, L., 1998, Dodging a Malthusian Bullet in the twentieth century, Agribusiness 14:15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, M., 1990, The human capital and science base, in: Agriculture and Economic Survival, M. Whitaker and D. Colyer, eds., Westview Press, Boulder, pp304 and 313–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunder, S., 2000,The Economics of Deforestation, Macmillan Press, London, pp. 95, 108–109, and 127–128.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Southgate, D., Bravo-Ureta, B., Whitaker, M. (2005). Economic Progress in the Countryside, Forests, and Public Policy. In: Romero, A., West, S.E. (eds) Environmental Issues in Latin America and the Caribbean. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3774-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics