Advertisement

New methods and perspectives on teacher evaluation

Who evaluates what and for which purposes?
  • Kari Smith

Keywords

Professional Development Teacher Evaluation Teacher Education Program Professional Knowledge Novice Teacher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apple, M.W. (2001). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Assessment Reform Group (2002). Testing, motivation and learning, Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
  3. Baume, D. (2001). A briefing on assessment of portfolios. LTSN Generic Centre, Assessment series No. 6. York: Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN).Google Scholar
  4. Berliner, D.C. (1992). The nature of expertise in teaching. In F.K. Oser, A. Dick & J. Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Berliner, D.C. (2001). Improving the quality of the teaching force. Educational Leadership, 58(1), 6–10.Google Scholar
  6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, G., & Irby, B.J. (2001). The principal portfolio (second edition). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  8. Burroughs, R. (2001). Composing standards and composing teachers. The problem of National Board Certification. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2), 223–232.Google Scholar
  9. Burroughs, R., Schwartz, T.A., & Hendricks-Lee, M. (2000). Communities of practices and discourse communities: negotiating boundaries in NBPTS certification. Teachers College Record, 102, 346–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Center for Instructional Development and Research (2003). Approaches to assessment of teaching.Google Scholar
  11. Cheng, Y.C. (2001). Teacher effectiveness in the new century: research for development and practice. In Y.C. Cheng, M.M.C. Mok, & K.T. Tsui (Eds.), Teaching effectiveness and teacher development-towards a new knowledge base (pp. 27–56). Dordrecht: The Hong Kong Institute of Education and Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Cochran-Smith, M. (2001). Higher standards for prospective teachers. What’s missing from the discourse? Journal of Teacher Education, 52(3), 179–181.Google Scholar
  13. Connelly, M. (2002). Narrative inquiry, diversity and teacher education. Keynote presented at the Fourth International Conference on Teacher Education, Teacher Education as a Social Mission: A key to the Future, The Mofet Institute, Achva College, and The Ministry of Education, Department of Teacher Education, Israel.Google Scholar
  14. Coolohan, J. (2002). Teacher education and the teaching career in an era of lifelong learning. OECD Education Working papers. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Directorate for Education.Google Scholar
  15. Craig, C.J. (1998). The influence of context on one teacher’s interpretive knowledge of team teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(4), 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Craig, C.J. (2003). School portfolio development: A teacher knowledge approach. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(2), 122–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crooks, T. (2003). Some criteria for intelligent accountability applied to accountability in New Zealand. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational research Association. Chicago.Google Scholar
  18. Darling-Hammond, L., Diez, M.E., Moss, P., Pecheone, R., Pullin, D., Schafer, W., & Vickers, L. (1998). The role of standards and assessment: A dialogue. In M. Diez (Ed.), Changing the practice of teacher education: Standards and assessment as a lever for change. Washington, DC: AACTE Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delandshere, G., & Arens, S.A. (2003). Examining the quality of the evidence in preservice teacher portfolios. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Draper, J. (2001). Career decision-making in teaching: Does classroom work satisfy teachers? In Y.C. Cheng, M.M.C. Mok & K.T. Tsui (Eds.), Teaching effectiveness and teacher development-towards a new knowledge base (pp.297–315). Dordrecht: The Hong Kong Institute of Education and Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fuller, F.F., & Bown, O.H. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In K. Ryan (Ed.), The education: The seventy-fourth yearbook of the national society for the study of education (pp.25–52). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gipps, C.V. (1994). Beyond Testing. London: The Falmer PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Gitlin, A., Peck, M., Aposhian, N., Hadley, S., & Porter, A. (2002). Looking again at insider knowledge, a relational approach to knowledge production and assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Handal, G., & Lauvas, P. (1987). Promoting reflective teaching: supervision in practice. Milton Keynes: SRHE and Open University Enterprises.Google Scholar
  27. Hargreaves, A. (1999). Reinventing professionalism: Teacher education and teacher development for a changing world. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education & Development, 2(1), 92–104.Google Scholar
  28. Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (1996). Teachers’ professional lives: Aspirations and actualities. In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ Professional Lives (pp.1–27). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  29. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (2003). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for State dialogue. The Council of Chief State School Offices.Google Scholar
  30. Koster, B., Korthagen, F.A.J., Wubbels, T., & Hoornweg, J. (1996). Roles, competencies and training of teacher educators, a new challenge. In E. Befring (Ed.), Teacher education for quality (pp. 397–411). ATEE, Oslo: Lobo Grafisk.Google Scholar
  31. Koster, B., & Dengerink, J. (2001). Towards a professional standard for Dutch teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 343–354.Google Scholar
  32. Mabry, L. (1999). Portfolio Plus — a critical guide to alternative assessment. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Marland, P. (2001). Teachers’ practical theories: implications for teacher development. In Y.C. Cheng, M.M.C. Mok & K.T. Tsui (Eds.), Teaching effectiveness and teacher development-towards a new knowledge base (pp. 165–182). Dordrecht: The Hong Kong Institute of Education and Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Murray, F.B. (2001). The overreliance of accreditors on consensus standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2), 211–222.Google Scholar
  35. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (1999). What teachers should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: NBPTS.Google Scholar
  36. Niall, M. (2003). The dangers of testing. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 43–46.Google Scholar
  37. Oser, F. (1998). Standards in teacher training. European Education, 30(2), 20–25.Google Scholar
  38. Popham, J.M. (2001). Teaching to the test? Educational Leadership, 58(6), 16–20.Google Scholar
  39. Rudduck, J. (1999). Teacher practice and the student voice. In M. Lang, J. Olson, H. Hansen & W. Bunder (Eds.), Changing schools/changing practices: Perspectives on educational reform and teacher professionalism. Louvain: Garant.Google Scholar
  40. Shulman, L.S. (1988). A union of insufficiencies: Strategies for teacher assessment in a period of reform. Educational Leadership, 36–41.Google Scholar
  41. Shulman, L.S. (1998). Teacher portfolios: A theoretical activity. In N. Lyons (Ed.), With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism (pp. 23–37). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  42. Scottish Executive (2002). Standard for chartered teacher, continuing professional development. GTC Scotland, EIS, COSLA, Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, K. (2002). Using student feedback for professional development. Invited plenary presentation at Middle East University, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, K. (2003). Teacher educators’ professional knowledge — How does it differ from teachers’ professional knowledge? Paper presented at the annual AERA meeting. Chicago.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, K. (in press). Assessment as gate-keeping in teacher education. In K. Smith & P. Frenkel (Eds.), Functions of Assessment in Teacher Education (Hebrew). Tel Aviv: Mofet Institute.Google Scholar
  46. Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (1998). Evaluating portfolio use as a learning tool for professionals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 41(2), 193–205.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (2001). Long term influences of portfolios on professional development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(2), 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spolsky, D., Horovitz, N., Lifschitz, D., Milstein, E., Steiner, J., & Ur, P. (2002). Core requirements for teachers of English: knowledge and performance. English Teachers’ Journal, 54, 3–9. ia]Sri Lanka., Minisitry of Education and Higher Education (2000). Guidelines for the Implementations of the Primary Education Reform.Google Scholar
  49. Tillema, H., & Verberg, C. (2002). Recognizing competence-evaluation of an alternative teacher licensing assessment program. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van der Westhuizen, G.J., & Smith, K. (2000). Teachers’ portfolio reflections: a comparative analysis. Teacher Development, 4(3), 339–352.Google Scholar
  51. Van Manen, M. (1999) Knowledge, reflection an complexity in teacher practice. In M. Lang, J. Olson, H. Hansen & W. Bunder (Eds.), Changing schools/changing practices: Perspectives on educational reform and teacher professionalism (pp.65–75). Leuven: Garant.Google Scholar
  52. Wolf, K. (1991). The schoolteacher’s portfolio: Issues in design, implementation, and evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(2), 129–136.Google Scholar
  53. Zeichner, K., & Wray, S. (2000). The teaching portfolio in US teacher education programs: What we know and what we need to know. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 613–621.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kari Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Oranim Academic College of EducationIsrael

Personalised recommendations