Design and Methodological Issues Related to Research on Partnerships between Teacher Education Institutions and Schools

  • Annemie Schepens


Teacher Education Educational Research Student Teacher Future Teacher American Educational Research Association 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, G. (1990). Fundamentals of educational research. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  2. Billett, S. (1996). Situated learning: bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorising. Learning and Instruction, 6(3), 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosker, R.J. (2000). Het evalueren van programma’s. In R.J. Bosker (Ed.), Onderwijskundig Lexicon, Editie III. Evalueren in het onderwijs (pp. 96–113). Alphen aan den Rijn (NL): Samsom.Google Scholar
  4. Bullough, R.V., & Kauchak, D. (1997). Partnerships between higher education and secondary schools: some problems. Journal of Education for Teaching, 23(3), 215–233.Google Scholar
  5. Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. New York: Doublebay.Google Scholar
  6. Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R., & Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.Google Scholar
  7. Florio-Ruane, S. (2002). More light. An argument for complexity in studies of teaching and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galluzo, G.R., & Craig, J.R. (1990). Evaluation of preservice teacher education programmes. In W. R. Houston, M. Haberman & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 599–616). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  9. Hagger, H., & McIntyre, D. (2000). What can research tell us about teacher education? Oxford Review of Education, 26(3-4), 483–494.Google Scholar
  10. Jonassen, D.H., & Land, S.M. (Eds.) (2000). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Kirk, G. (1997). Partnership: The sharing of cultures? In J. McCall & R.M. Mackay (Eds.), Partnership and cooperation (pp. 35–48), Paper from the 21st Annual Conference of the Association for Teacher Education in Europe (ATEE) held at the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, September 1996.Google Scholar
  12. Knight, S.L., & Wiseman, D.L. (2002). Making the case: Lessons learned from school-university partnership research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.Google Scholar
  13. Koetsier, C.P., & Wubbels, T. (1995). Bridging the gap between initial teacher education and teacher induction. Journal of Education for Teaching, 21(3), 333–345.Google Scholar
  14. Labaree, D.F. (2000). Educational researchers. Living with a lesser form of knowledge. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T. E. Hauge & J. Møller (Eds.), The Life and Work of Teachers (pp. 55–75). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lowyck, J., & Pieters, J.M. (1993). The quality of teaching: a research programming study on the quality and the functioning of teachers conducted for the institute of educational research in the Netherlands. Den Haag: SVO.Google Scholar
  17. Rudduck, J. (1999). Teacher practice and the student voice. In M. Lang, J. Olson, H. Hansen & W. Bü nder (Eds.), Changing schools/Changing practices: Perspectives on educational reform and teacher professionalism (pp. 41–54). Louvain (B): Garant.Google Scholar
  18. Scholz, R.W., & Tietje, O. (2002). Embedded case study methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Shulman, L.S. (2002). Truth and consequences? Inquiry and policy in research on teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 248–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smedley, L. (2001). Impediments to partnerships: a literature review of school-university links. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 7(2), 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Teitel, L. (2001). An assessment framework for professional development schools. Going beyond the leap of faith. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 57–69.Google Scholar
  22. Walker, J.C., & Evers, C.W. (1997). Research in education: Epistemological issues. In J.P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 22–31). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  23. Wardekker, W.L. (2000). Criteria for the Quality of Inquiry. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Weiner, L. (2002). Evidence and inquiry in teacher education. What’s needed for urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 254–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J., & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130–178.Google Scholar
  27. Wielemans, W. (2000). Ingewikkelde ontwikkeling. Opvoeding en onderwijs in relatie tot maatschappij en cultuur. Leuven/Leusden (B): Acco.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, S.M., Floden, R.E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. University of Washington: Centre for Study of Teaching and Policy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annemie Schepens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Education of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesBelgium

Personalised recommendations