Skip to main content

A Multi-Disciplinary Design Studio using a Shared IFC Building Model

  • Conference paper
Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures 2005

Abstract

This paper reports on a multi-disciplinary building design studio where a shared IFC (Industry Foundation Classes) building model was employed to support a collaborative design process in a studio-teaching environment. This project began with the premise that the efforts over the past decade of the International Alliance for Interoperability (IAI) to develop a genuinely operational building model schema has resulted in a mature technology that is now ready to be applied. This design studio experience sought to test that premise. The paper discusses the background to the idea of design collaboration based on a shared building model, placing this current work within that context. We look at both the nature of design decision-making, as well as the process opportunities afforded by close multi-disciplinary collaboration and rapid feedback from design analysis. Although the work was undertaken in a teaching context, the paper does not discuss the pedagogical issue, but rather concentrates on the operational issues that are encountered when working with a shared building model during a design process. The paper concludes with a statement of the lessons learnt and strategies to be adopted in future projects of this nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cheng, Nancy Yen-wen. 2003. Approaches to design collaboration research. Automation in Construction. 12(6): 715–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, Charles, and Tay Sheng Jeng. 1999. A database supporting evolutionary product model development for design, Automation in Construction, 8(3): 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Martin, and Calvin Kam. 2002. CIFE Technical Report Number 143: PM4D Final Report. Stanford: CIFE, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galle, Per. 1995. Towards integrated, ‘intelligent’, and compliant computer modeling of buildings. Automation in Construction 4(3): 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GeoPraxis. 2004. AEC Design Practice Study 2004-Final Report, Petaluma, CA: GeoPraxis. Internet. Available from http://www.geopraxis.com/; accessed 30 November 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfawy, Mahmoud R. and Thomas Froese. 2002. Modeling and Implementation of Smart AEC Objects: An IFC Perspective. In Proceedings of the CIB w78 conference: distributing knowledge in building. Aarhus School of Architecture, 12–14 June 2002. Internet. Available from http://www.cib-w78-2002.dk/papers/papers.htm; accessed 1 February 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAI — International Alliance for Interoperability. 2004. IAI International Home Page. Available from http://www.iai-international.org/iai_international/; accessed 28 November 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalay, Yehuda E. 1998. P3: Computational environment to support design collaboration. Automation in Construction 8(1): 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kam, Calvin and Martin Fischer. 2004. Capitalizing on early project decision-making opportunities to improve facility design, construction, and life-cycle performance—POP, PM4D, and decision dashboard approaches. Automation in Construction 13(1): 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Inhan, Thomas Liebich, and Tom Maver. 1997. Managing design data in an integrated CAAD environment: a product model approach. Automation in Construction 7(1): 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvan, Thomas. 2000. Collaborative design: what is it? Automation in Construction 9(4): 409–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Yan-Chuen, and J.D. Gilleard. 2002. Collaborative design: a process model for refurbishment. Automation in Construction 11(5): 535–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, Mary Lou, Pak-San Liew, and John S. Gero. 2003. An agent approach to data sharing in virtual worlds and CAD. In Proceedings of the 20th CIB W78 Conference on Information Technology in Construction. Waiheke Island, Auckland, New Zealand, 23–25 April 2003. Internet. Available from https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/w78/; accessed 1 January 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham, Nghia, and Anthony Dawson. 2003. Data rich digital architectural environments: Managing rich information flows in architectural practices of Australia. In Proceedings of the 20th CIB W78 Conference on Information Technology in Construction. Waiheke Island, Auckland, New Zealand, 23–25 April 2003. Internet. Available from https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/w78/; accessed 1 January 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Plume, J., Mitchell, J. (2005). A Multi-Disciplinary Design Studio using a Shared IFC Building Model. In: Martens, B., Brown, A. (eds) Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures 2005. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3698-1_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics