Abstract
In environmental economics, numerical simulation using random draws is the method most commonly used to estimate joint probabilities of individual choices in discrete-choice, random-parameters models. This paper compares simulation to another method of estimation, Gaussian quadrature, on the basis of speed and accuracy. The comparison is done using stated preference data consisting of the answers to choice questions for fishing in Green Bay, a large bay on Lake Michigan. Each sampled individual chose between a pair of Green Bay scenarios with different fishing conditions. Quadrature is found to be as accurate as simulation based on random draws, but Gaussian quadrature attains stability in estimated parameters considerably faster.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Breffle, W.S., Morey, E., Waldman, D. (2005). Gaussian Quadrature Versus Simulation for the Estimation of Random Parameters. In: Scarpa, R., Alberini, A. (eds) Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3684-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3684-1_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3683-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3684-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)