Abstract
After more than two decades of computers in education in Australian schools there is still confusion at all levels about why technology matters and widespread reluctance to move beyond the tokenistic use of computers in classrooms. Why? The reasons are probably many and varied but this chapter proffers the notion that the confusion and reluctance stems from the lack of a shared vision, at the school and classroom level, and the lack of pragmatic teaching frameworks that take into account the realities of teaching in the 21st century. In this chapter scenario planning will be applied to the conundrum that is, Information and Communication Technologies in Education (ICTE). The focal point selected will be how ICT’s impact on teaching and learning. The organizational mental models that exist range from, the use of ICT underpinned by constructivist theory, to the behaviorist view, that technology makes learning faster, easier and cheaper. Colliding forces and trends include; outcomes based curriculum, rapidly changing technology, and increasing accountability. Two themes are chosen. The first theme, not surprisingly, is the technology itself. We can choose to saturate teaching and learning with technology or not. The second theme is teaching and learning theory. The two themes are placed on a continuum, intersected, and positioned on a matrix. From the matrix scenarios are extracted and presented as vignettes. It will be argued that the scenario planning stages of establishing a focal point, identifying organizational mental models, and conducting an environmental scan can greatly assist schools in developing a shared vision, and that the teasing out of narratives can greatly assist in the development of realistic teaching methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Atkinson, R. (1968). Computerized instruction and the learning process. American Psychologist. 23, 225–239.
Brown, A. L., J. Bransford, et al. (1999). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
College of Marin (2002). Scenario Planning, College of Marin 835 College Ave Kentfield California. Accessed on 17.10.2002 at http://www.marin.cc.ca.us/scenario/what_exactly_is.htm.
Dede, C. (2002). Vignettes about the Future of Learning Technologies. Visions 2020. U.S. Department of Commerce. Washington DC: Technology Administration Office of Public Affairs.
Edwards, S. and G. Romeo (2003). Interlearn: an online teaching and learning system developed at Monash University. Paper presented at the E-Learn 2003 World Conference of E-Learning in corporate, government, healthcare & higher education, Arizona, USA.
Helfgott, D. and M. Westhaver (2003). Inspiration, Inspiration Software Inc.
Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: mindtools for critical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Merrill.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: engaging critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Merrill.
NCREL (2002). Engauge, North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Accessed on 17.10.2002 at http://www.ncrel.org/engauge/.
NCREL, N. C. R. E. L. and G. Metiri (2003). enGauge 21st Century Skills for 21st Century Learners: Literacy in the Digital Age. Naperville, Illinois: 85.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Brighton: Harvester.
Papert, S. (1992). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
Pausch, R. (2002). A Curmudgeon’s Vision for Technology in Education. Visions 2020. U.S. Department of Commerce. Washington DC: Technology Administration Office of Public Affairs.
Romeo, G. I. (2003). Technology matters but good teaching matters more. In Information and communication technology and the teacher of the future: IFIP TC3/WG3.1 & WG3.3 Working Conference on ICT and the Teacher of the Future, January 27–31, 2003, Melbourne, Australia. International Federation for Information Processing; 131. C. Dowling and K.-W. Lai. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 191–202.
Schwartz, P. and Australian Business Network. (1996). The Art of the Long View: Paths to Strategic Insight for Yourself and Your Company. St. Leonards, N.S.W: Australian Business Network.
Spender, D. and F. Stewart (2002). Embracing e-learning in Australian Schools. Melbourne, Commonwealth Bank. Accessed on 17.10.2002 at http://about.commbank.com.au/GAC_File_Metafile/0,1687,2003%255Fe%252Dlearning%255Freport,00.pdf.
Suppes, P. and M. Morningstar (1968). Computer-assisted instruction. Science, 16, 343–350.
Taylor, R. (1980). The Computer in the school: tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Teachers College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Romeo, G. (2006). Engage, Empower, Enable: Developing a Shared Vision for Technology in Education. In: Hung, D., Khine, M.S. (eds) Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3669-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3669-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3668-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3669-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)