Skip to main content

Engaged Learning: Making Learning an Authentic Experience

  • Chapter
Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies

Abstract

This chapter attempts to make sense of engaged learning. Approaches such as problem-based learning should be advocated because it is an authentic form of learning encouraging students to be self-regulated and thus metacognitive towards their own thinking and behaviors. Contrary to passive forms of instruction where learners are not perceived to be active and engaged, neither reflective, we are highlighting alternative pedagogies which promote this sense of self-regulatory actions. We describe the engaged learning framework — focusing on both problem and process — which would be necessary for authenticity in learning experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B.J.S., Schwartz, D.L., Vye, N.J., Moore, A., Petrosino, T., Sech, L., Bransford, J., & the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 271–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2000). Process and product in Problem-Based Learning (PBL) research. In D.H. Evensen (Ed.) Problem-Based Learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 185–195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self assessment. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. & Feletti, G. (Eds.) (1997). The challenge of problem-based learning. Stirling: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredo, E. (1994). Reconstructing educational psychology: Situated cognition and Deweyan pragmatism. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1996). Psychological learning theory and the design of innovative environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Shauble & R. Glaser (Eds.). Contributions of instructional innovation to understanding learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. (2002). Qualitative approaches to investigating self-regulated learning: Contributions and challenges. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1964). Science as subject matter and as method. In R.D. Archambault (Ed.). John Dewey on Education: Selected writings (pp. 121–127). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D.C. (1998). Realising authentic science learning through the adaptation of science practice (pp. 317–331). In B.J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D., Gordin, D., & Pea, R. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3 & 4), 391–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R.A., & Conant, F.R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: The critique of functionalist reason. Vol 2. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo, C., & Evensen, D.H. (2000). Problem-Based Learning: Gaining insights on learning interactions. In D.H. Evensen (Ed.) Problem-Based Learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 4–8). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, D. (2002). Situated cognition and Problem based learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(4), 393–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with Technology: A constructivist perspective. NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B.F., Valdez, G., Nowakowski, J. & Rasmussen, C. (1995). Plugging in: Choosing and Using Educational Technology. Washington DC: Council for Educational Development and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myer, D.K., & Turner, J.C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F.M., & Wehlage, G.G. (April, 1993). Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, H., & Middleton, M.J. (2002). Turning the kaleidoscope: What we see when self-regulated learning is viewed with a qualitative lens. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S.G., & Paris, A.H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, H., & Middleton, M.J. (2002). Turning the kaleidoscope: What we see when self-regulated learning is viewed with a qualitative lens. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W-M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savery, J. & Duffy, T. (1998). Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In R. Fogarty (Ed.). Problem Based Learning: A collection of articles (pp. 73–92). IL: SkyLight Training and Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1999). Schools as knowledge-building organizations. In D. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Today’s children, tomorrow’s society: The developmental health and wealth of nations (pp. 274–289). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J., Marx, R.W., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepien, W., & Gallagher, S. (1998). Problem-Based Learning: As authentic as it gets. In R. Fogarty (Ed.). Problem Based Learning: A collection of articles (pp. 43–49). IL: SkyLight Training and Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D.H. Schunk & BJ. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational implications (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hung, D., Tan, S.C., Koh, T.S. (2006). Engaged Learning: Making Learning an Authentic Experience. In: Hung, D., Khine, M.S. (eds) Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3669-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics