Skip to main content

Three Waves of Education Reform: Internal, Interface, and Future

  • Chapter
New Paradigm for Re-engineering Education
  • 1213 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6. References

  • Beare, H., & Slaughter, R. (1993). Education for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackledge, D., & Hunt, B. (1985). Sociological interpretations of education. Sydney: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogan, C. E., & English, M. J. (1994). Benchmarking for best practices. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L. H. (1993). Total quality management for schools. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubb, S. (2001). Performance management: Monitoring teaching in the primary school. UK: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, N. C., & Torres, C. A. (Eds.). (2000). Globalization and education: Critical perspectives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (1995a). Function and effectiveness of education (3rd ed.). Hong Kong: Wide Angle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (1995b). School education quality: Conceptualization, monitoring, & enhancement. In P. K. Siu & P. Tam (eds.), Quality in education: Insights from different perspectives (pp. 123–147). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (1996a). School effectiveness and school-based improvement: A mechanism for development. London, UK: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (1996b). The improvement of school management: Theory, change and practice. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (1997a). Monitoring school effectiveness: Conceptual and practical dilemmas in developing a framework. Eugene, OR: ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) (No. EA 028359). Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (USA). (In H. Meng, Y. Zhou, & Y. Fang (Eds.), School based indicators of effectiveness: Experiences and practices in APEC members (pp. 197–206). China: Guangxi Normal University Press.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (1997b). A framework of indicators of education quality in Hong Kong primary schools: Development and application. Eugene, OR: ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) (No. EA 028358). Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (USA). (In H. Meng, Y. Zhou, & Y. Fang (Eds.), School based indicators of effectiveness: Experiences and practices in APEC members (pp. 207–250). China: Guangxi Normal University Press.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (1998). The pursuit of a new knowledge base for teacher education and development in the new century. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education and Development, 1(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (2000a). A CMI-triplization paradigm for reforming education in the new millennium. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(4), 156–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (2000b). Educational change and development in Hong Kong: Effectiveness, quality, and relevance. In T. Townsend & Y. C. Cheng (Eds.), Educational change and development in the Asia-Pacific region: Challenges for the future (pp.17–56). The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (2001a, January 5–9). Educational relevance, quality and effectiveness: Paradigm shifts. Invited keynote speech presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (2001b, February 14–16). Towards the third wave of education reforms in Hong Kong. Keynote speech presented at the International Forum on Education Reforms in the Asia-Pacific Region, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y.C. (2003a). Trends in education reforms in the Asia-Pacific Region. In Keeves, J. & Watanabe, R. (chief editors). The handbook on educational research in the Asia-Pacific Region. (section 1, pp. 3–16) Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y.C. (2003b). Challenges and research into education reforms in the Asia-Pacific Region. In Keeves, J. & Watanabe, R. (chief editors). The handbook on educational research in the Asia-Pacific Region. (section 8, pp.1315–1330) Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C., Chow, K. W., & Tsui, K. T. (Eds.). (2000). School curriculum change and development in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C., & Tam, W. M. (1997). Multi-models of quality in education. Quality Assurance in Education, 5(1), 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C., & Townsend, T. (2000). Educational change and development in the Asia-Pacific region: Trends and issues. In T. Townsend & Y. C. Cheng (Eds.), Educational change and development in the Asia-Pacific region: Challenges for the future (pp. 317–344) The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C., & Walker, A. D. (1997). Multi-functions of school-based teacher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 11(2), 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coniam, D., Falvey, P., Bodycott, P., Crew, V., & Sze, P. M. M. (2000). Establishing English language benchmarks for primary teachers of English language: A report to ACTEQ. Hong Kong: Advisory Committee of Teacher Education and Qualification.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, A. J. (1999). Market education: The unknown history. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuttance, P. (1994). Monitoring education quality through performance indicators for school practice. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(2), 101–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalin, P., & Rust, V. D. (1996). Towards schooling for the twenty-first Century. New York: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daun, H. (2001). Educational restructuring in the context of globalization and national policy. US: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, N., Sachs, J., Distant, G., Logan, L., & Tom, C. (1993, January). Planning in primary schools: A national study in Australian schools. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Norrkoping, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. R. (1999). Calling academia to account: Rights and responsibilities. Buckingham, Great Britain: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, A. V. (1951). Quality control: Principles, practice, and administration. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidler, B., & Atton, T. (1999). Poorly performing staff in schools and how to manage them: Capability, competence and motivation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. C. (1994). Measuring up to the Baldrige. New York: American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind: What all students should understand. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, S. (1992). The Baldrige quality system. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, C. D. (2001). Holding sacred ground: The impact of standardization. Educational Leadership, 58(4), 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz, M. E., & Duffy, M. C. (2001). Assessment and accountability systems in the 50 States, 1999–2000. CPRE Research Report Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. S., & Gaunt, H. J. (1994). Total quality management for schools. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H., & Hopkins, D. (1991). The empowered school. UK: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headington, R. (2000). Monitoring, assessment, recording, reporting and accountability: Meeting the standards. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D. E. (Ed.). (2001). The states and public higher education policy: Affordable, access, and accountability. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N., & Lund, H. S. (Eds.). (2000). Benchmarking for higher education. Buckingham, England: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. A., Aitken, R., & Jantzi, D. (2001). Making schools smarter: A system for monitoring school and district progress. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J. E. C. (1999). Schools must speak for themselves: The case for school self-evaluation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J. E. C. (2000). Self-evaluation in European schools: A story of change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, P., & Hextall, I. (2000). Reconstructing teaching: Standards, performance and accountability. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medley, D. M. (1982). Teacher effectiveness. In H. E. Mitzel et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational research (5th ed., pp. 1894–1903). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C., & Morris, G. (1999). Good teaching and learning: Pupils and teachers speak. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murgatroyd, S., & Morgan, C. (1993). Total quality management and the school. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmuck, R. A., & Runkel, P. J. (1985). The handbook of organization development in schools (3rd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H., Armstrong, M. & Brown, S. (Eds). (1999). Benchmarking and threshold standards in higher education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromquist, N. P. & Monkman, K. (2000). Globalization and education: Integration and contestation across cultures. Lanham, Md. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, B. S. & Lovell, J. H. (Eds). (2000). The portfolio standard: How students can show us what they know and are able to do. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenner, A. R., & Detoro, I. J. (1992). Total quality management. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2005). Three Waves of Education Reform: Internal, Interface, and Future. In: New Paradigm for Re-engineering Education. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3620-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics