Abstract
The polar cusps have traditionally been described as narrow funnel-shaped regions of magnetospheric magnetic field lines directly connected to magnetosheath ones, allowing the magnetosheath plasma to precipitate into the ionosphere. However, recent middle- to highaltitude observations (i.e., the Interball, Hawkeye, Polar, Image, and Cluster spacecraft) reported the cusps to encompass a broad area near local noon. The present paper focuses on a statistical study of the high-altitude cusp and surrounding magnetosheath regions as well as on some peculiarities of the cusp-magnetosheath transition. For a comparison of high- and lowaltitude cusp determination, we present a mapping of two-year Magion-4 (a part of the Interball project) observations of cusp-like plasma along model magnetic field lines (according to the Tsyganenko 96 model) down to the Earth’s surface. The footprint positions show a substantial latitudinal dependence on the dipole tilt angle. The dependence can be fitted by a line with a slope of 0.14° MLAT per 1° of tilt. In contrary to previously reported IMF or solar wind influences on the cusp shape or location, some differences exist: (1) a possible IMF BB X dependence of the cusp location, (2) a split cusp for B Y ≠ 0, and (3) a smaller cusp during periods of higher solar wind dynamic pressure. The conclusions following from the statistical analysis are confirmed by case studies which reveal the physical mechanisms leading to the observed phenomena. Results have shown that (1) reconnection near the cusp does not necessarily lead to observable precipitation, (2) the cusp precipitation in one hemisphere can be supplied from the conjugate hemisphere, and (3) the cusp geometry at a certain time depends on the IMF history.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aparicio, B., Thelin, B., and Lundin, R.: 1991. ‘The Polar Cusp from a Particle Point of View: A Statistical Study based on Viking data’, J. Geophys. Res. 96(A8), 14023–14031.
Cowley, S.W.H.: 1981. ‘Asymmetry Effects Associated with the X-Component of the IMF in a Magnetically Open Magnetosphere’, Planet. Space Sci. 29(8), 809–818.
Crooker, N. U.: 1979. ‘Dayside Merging and Cusp Geometry’, J. Geophys. Res. 84(NA3), 951–959.
Dungey, J. W.: 1961. ‘Interplanetary Field and Auroral Zones’, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6(2), 47.
Dungey, J. W.: 1963, Geophysics: The Earth’s Environment, Chapt. The structure of the exosphere or adventures in velocity space, Gordon and Breach, New York 526.
Eastman, T. E., Boardsen, S. A., Chen, S.-H., Fung, S. F., and Kessel, R. L.: 2000. ‘Configuration of High-latitude and High-altitude Boundary Layers’, J. Geophys. Res. 105(A10), 23221–23238.
Farrell, W. M., and Allen, J. A. V.: 1990. ‘Observations of the Earth’s Polar Cleft at Large Radial Distances with the Hawkeye 1 Magnetometer’, J. Geophys. Res. 95(A12), 20945–20958.
Fedorov, A., Budnik, E., and Sauvaud, J.-A.: 2002. ‘On the Origin of the High-latitude Boundary Layer’, Adv. Space Res. 30(12), 2763–2770.
Fedorov, A., Dubinin, E., Song, P., Budnick, E., Larson, P., and Sauvaud, J.-A.: 2000. ‘Characteristics of the Exterior Cusp for Steady Southward Interplanetary Magnetic Field: Interball Observations’, J. Geophys. Res. 105(A7), 15945–15957.
Fuselier, S. A., Petrinec, S. M., and Trattner, K. J.: 2000. ‘Stability of the High-latitude Reconnection Site for Steady Northward IMF’, Geophys Res. Lett. 27(4), 473–476.
Haerendel, G., Paschmann, G., Sckopke, N., and Rosenbauer, H.: 1978. ‘The Frontside Boundary Layer of the Magnetosphere and the Problem of Reconnection’, J. Geophys. Res. 83(NA7), 3195–3216.
Kessel, R. L., Chen, S. H., Green, J. L., Fung, S. F., Boardsen, S. A., Tan, L. C., Eastman, T. E., Craven, J. D., and Frank, L. A.: 1996. ‘Evidence of High-latitude Reconnecting during Northward IMF: Hawkeye Observations’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 23(5), 583–586.
Klimov, S., Romanov, S., Amata, E., Blecki, J., Buchner, J., Juchniewicz, J., Rustenbach, J., Triska, P., Woolliscroft, L. J. C., Savin, S., Afanasyev, Y., deAngelis, U., Auster, U., Bellucci, G., Best, A., Farnik, F., Formisano, V., Gough, P., Grard, R., Grushin, V., Haerendel, G., Ivchenko, V., Korepanov, V., Lehmann, H., Nikutowski, B., Nozdrachev, M., Orsini, S., Parrot, M., Petrukovich, A., Rauch, J. L., Sauer, K., Skalsky, A., Slominski, J., Trotignon, J. G., Vojta, J., and Wronowski, R.: 1997. ‘ASPI Experiment: Measurements of Fields and Waves Onboard the Interball-1 Spacecraft’, Ann. Geophys. 15(5), 514–527.
Le, G., Raeder, G., Russell, J., Lu, C. T., Petrinec, S. M., and Mozer, F. S.: 2001. ‘Polar Cusp and Vicinity Under Strongly Northward Interplanetary Magnetic Field on April 11, 1997: Observations and MHD Simulations’, J. Geophys. Res. 106(A10), 21083–21093.
Maynard, N. C., Weber, E. J., Weimer, D. R., Moen, J., Onsager, T., Heelis, R. A., and Egeland, A.: 1997. ‘How Wide in Magnetic Local Time is the Cusp? An Event Study’, J. Geophys. Res. 102(A3), 4765–4776.
Merka, J., Šafránková, J., and Němeček, Z.: 1999. ‘Interball Observations of the High-altitude Cusp-like Plasma: A Statistical Study’, Czech. J. Phys. 49(4a), 695–709.
Merka, J., Šafránková, J., and Němeček, Z.: 2002. ‘Cusp-like Plasma in High Altitudes: A Statistical Study of the Width and Location of the Cusp from Magion-4’, Ann. Geophys. 20, 311–320.
Merka, J., Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Savin, S., and Skalsky, A.: 2000. ‘High-altitude Cusp: INTERBALL Observation’, Adv. Space Res. 25(7/8), 1425–1434.
Newell, P. T., and Meng, C.-I.: 1987. ‘Cusp Width and Bz: Observations and Conceptual Model’, J. Geophys. Res. 92(A12), 13673–13678.
Newell, P. T., and Meng, C.-I.: 1989. ‘Dipole Tilt Angle Effects on the Latitude of the Cusp and Cleft/Low-latitude Boundary Layer’, J. Geophys. Res. 94(A6), 6949–6953.
Newell, P. T., and Meng, C.-I.: 1992. ‘Mapping the Dayside Ionosphere to the Magnetosphere according to Particle Precipitation Characteristics’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 19(6), 609–612.
Newell, P. T., and Meng, C.-I.: 1994. ‘Ionospheric Projections of Magnetospheric Regions under Low and High Solar Wind Pressure Conditions’, J. Geophys. Res. 99(A1), 273–286.
Newell, P. T., Meng, C.-I., Sibeck, D. G., and Lepping, R.: 1989. ‘Some Low-altitude Cusp Dependencies on the Interplanetary Magnetic Field’, J. Geophys. Res. 94(A7), 8921–8927.
Němeček, Z., Fedorov, A., Šafránková, J., and Zastenker, G.: 1997. ‘Structure of the Lowlatitude Magnetopause: MAGION-4 Observation’, Ann. Geophys. 15(5), 553–561.
Němeček, Z., Měrka, J., and Šafránková, J: 2000. ‘The Tilt Angle Control of the Outer Cusp Position’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27(1), 77–80.
Němeček, Z., Šafránková, J., Přech, L., Šimůnek, J., Sauvaud, J.-A., Fedorov, A., Stenuit, H., Fuselier, S. A., Savin, S., Zelenyi, L., and Berchem, J.: 2003, ‘Structure of the Outer Cusp and Sources of the Cusp Precipitation during Intervals of a Horizontal IMF’. J. Geophys. Res. 108(A12), 1420, doi: 10.1029/2003JA009916.
Onsager, T. G., Kletzing, C. A., Austin, J. B., and MacKiernan, H.: 1993. ‘Model of Magnetosheath Plasma in the Magnetosphere: Cusp and Mantle Particles at Low Altitudes.’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 20(6), 479–482.
Paschmann, G., Haerendel, G., Sckopke, N., and Rosenbauer, H.: 1978. ‘The Entry Layer’, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 40(3), 257–259.
Potemra, T. A., Erlandson, R. E., Zanetti, L. J., Arnoldy, R. L., Woch, J., and Friis-Christensen, E.: 1992. ‘The Dynamic Cusp’, J. Geophys. Res. 97(A3), 2835–2844.
Russell, C. T., Fedder, J. A., Slinker, S. P., Zhou, X.-W., Lee, G., Luhmann, J. G., Fenrich, F., Chandler, M. O., Moore, T. E., and Fuselier, S. A.: 1998. ‘Entry of the POLAR Spacecraft into the Polar Cusp under Northward IMF Conditions’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25(15), 3015–3018.
Šafránková, J., Merka, J., and Němeček, Z.: 2002. ‘Plasma Flow Across the Cusp-Magnetosheath Boundary under Northward IMF’, Adv. Space Res. 30(12), 2787–2792.
Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Sibeck, D. G., Přech, L., Merka, J., and Santolík, O.: 1998. ‘Two Point Observation of High-latitude Reconnection’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25(23), 4301–4304.
Šafránková, J., Zastenker, G., Němeček, Z., Fedorov, A., Simerský, M., and Přech, L.: 1997. ‘Small Scale Observation of the Magnetopause Motion: Preliminary Results of the INTERBALL Project’, Ann. Geophys. 15(5), 562–569.
Sandahl, I.: 2002. ‘Recent Cusp and Cleft Results from Interball’, Adv. Space Res. 30(7), 1711–1722.
Savin, S. P., Romanov, S. A., Fedorov, A. O., Zelenyi, L., Klimov, S. I., Yermolaev, Y. I., Budnik, E. Y., Nikolaeva, N. S., Russell, C. T., Zhou, X.-W., Urquhart, A. L., and Reiff, P. H.: 1998. ‘The Cusp/Magnetosheath Interface on May 29, 1996: Interball-1 and Polar Observations’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25(15), 2963–2966.
Savin, S. P., Zelenyi, L., Maynard, N., Sandahl, I., Kawano, H., Russell, C. T., Romanov, S., Amata, E., Avanov, L., Blecki, J., Buechner, J., Consolini, G., Gustafsson, G., Klimov, S., Marcucci, F., Němeček, Z., Nikutowski, B., Pickett, J., Rauch, J. L., Šafránková, J., Skalsky, A., Smirnov, V., Stasiewicz, K., Song, P., Trotignon, J. G., and Yermolaev, Y.: 2002. ‘Multispacecraft Tracing of Turbulent Boundary Layer’, Adv. Space Res. 30(12), 2821–2830.
Spreiter, J. R., Summers, A. L., and Alksne, A. Y.: 1966. ‘Hydromagnetic Flow Around the Magnetosphere’, Planet. Space Sci. 14, 223–253.
Tsyganenko, N. A., and Stern, D. P.: 1996. ‘A New-generation Global Magnetosphere Field Model based on Spacecraft Magnetometer Data’, ISTP Newsletter 6, 1–21.
Šimůnek, J., Němeček, Z., and Šafránková, J.: 2003. ‘Configuration of the Outer Cusp after an IMF Rotation’, Adv. Space Res. 31(5), 1395–1400.
Weiss, L. A., Reiff, P. H., Weber, E. J., Carlson, H. C., Lockwood, M., and Peterson, W. K.: 1995. ‘Flow-aligned Jets in the Magnetoshperic Cusp: Results from the Geospace Environment Modeling Pilot Program’, J. Geophys. Res. 100(A5), 7649–7659.
Woch, J., and Lundin, R.: 1992. ‘Signatures of Transient Boundary Layer Processes Observed with Viking’, J. Geophys. Res. 97(A2), 1431–1447.
Zhou, X.-W., Russell, C. T., and Le, G.: 2000. ‘Solar Wind Control of the Polar Cusp at High Altitude’, J. Geophys. Res. 105(A1), 245–251.
Zhou, X.-W., Russell, C. T., Le, G., Fuselier, S. A., and Scudder, J. D.: 1999. ‘The Polar Cusp Location and its Dependence on Dipole Tilt’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 26(3), 429–432.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Merka, J., Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Šimůnek, J. (2005). Magion-4 High-Altitude Cusp Study. In: Fritz, T.A., Fung, S.F. (eds) The Magnetospheric Cusps: Structure and Dynamics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3605-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3605-1_3
Received:
Accepted:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3438-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3605-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)