Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

English Word-Formation Processes

Observations, Issues, and Thoughts on Future Research

  • Chapter
Handbook of Word-Formation

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 64))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, Valerie. 2001. Complex Words in English. Longman: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algeo, John. 1971. “The voguish uses of non.” American Speech 46, 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Margaret. 1978. Morphological Investigations. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Connecticut, Storrs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Mona. 1979. Noun Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation. University of Connecticut, Storrs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Edna. 1986. “A synchronic analysis of de- and un- in American English.” American Speech 61/3, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apresjan, Jurij. 1974. “Regular Polysemy.” Linguistics 142, 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. MIT Press: Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, Mark and Sungeun Cho. 2001. “The semantics of -ship suffixation.” Linguistic Inquiry 32, 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, Mark and Fuhrhop, Nanna. 2002. “Restricting Suffix Combinations in German and English: Closing Suffixes and the Monosuffix Constraint.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20/3, 451–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Chris. 1998. “Episodic -ee in English: A thematic role constraint on new word formation.” Language 74, 695–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Laurie. 1978. The Grammar of Nominal Compounding with special reference to Danish, English and French. Odense: Odense University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Laurie. 1987. “-ee by Gum!” American Speech 62, 315–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Laurie. 1993. “More-ee words.” American Speech 68, 222–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Laurie. 1998. “When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English?” English Language and Linguistics 2/1, 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Laurie. 2003. “English Prefixation — A Typological Shift?” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 50/1–2, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Laurie and Renouf, Antoinette. 2001. “A corpus-based study of compounding in English.” Journal of English Linguistics 29/2, 101–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, Robert. 1976. “Once more on the analysis of ed-adjectives.” Journal of Linguistics 12, 155–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, Robert. 1991. “Decompositional Composition: The Semantics of Scope Ambiguities and ‘Bracketing Paradoxes.’” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 195–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, Robert. 1993. “Simultaneous Dual Derivational Origin.” Language 69, 716–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme Morpheme Base Morphology. SUNY Press: Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, Manfred. 1988. “On the grammar of local prepositions.” In: M. Bierwisch, W. Motsch, and I. Zimmermann (eds.), Syntax, Semantik, und Lexikon: Rudolf Ruzicka zum 65. Geburtstag. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, Manfred. 1996. “How Much Space Gets Into Language?” In: P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 31–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert. 1986. “Form and meaning in morphology: the case of Dutch ‘Agent’ Nouns.” Linguistics 24, 503–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert. 1988. “The relation between inheritance and argument-linking: deverbal nouns in Dutch.” In: M. Everaert, A. Evers, R. Huybrechts, and M. Trommelen (eds.), Morphology and Modularity. Dordrecht: Foris, 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert. 1992. “Compounding in Dutch.” Rivista di Linguistica 4/1, 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert and Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. “On the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics in English and Dutch.” Linguistics 42/2, 327–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert and van Haaften, Ton. 1988. “On the external syntax of derived words: evidence from Dutch.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1988. Dordrecht: Foris, 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botha, Rudolf P. 1980. Word-based morphology and synthetic compounding. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics, No. 5, University of Stellenbosch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brekle, Herbert. 1970. Generative Satzsemantik und transformationelle Syntax im System der englischen Nominalkomposition. Munich: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan. 1982. “Polyadicity.” In: J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1970. “Remarks on Nominalization.” In: R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn, 184–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Eve and Clark, Herbert. 1979. “When nouns surface as verbs.” Language 55/4, 767–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, Bernard and Thompson, Sandra. 1985. “Lexical nominalization.” In: T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Volume III. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 349–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the Definition of Word. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: the Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Don, Jan. 1993. Morphological Conversion. OTS Dissertation series. University of Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabb, Nigel. 1988. “English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 527–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Bruce. 1976. The Verb-Particle Combination in English. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Jingqi; Roeper, Thomas; and Borer, Hagit. 2001. “The VP within process nominals: Evidence from adverbs and the VP anaphor do so.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19, 549–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giegerich, Heinz. 1999. Lexical Strata in English: Morphological causes, phonological effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giegerich, Heinz. 2004. “Compound or Phrase? English noun-plus-noun constructions and the stress criterion.” English Language and Linguistics 8/1, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorska, Elzbieta. 1984. “Moonless nights and smoke-free cities, or what can be without what? A cognitive study of privative adjectives in English.” Folia Linguistica 28/3–4, 413–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gracia, Lluisa and Azkarate, Miren. 1998. Prefixes, heads and word order. Ms. University of Girona and University of the Basque Country.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gracia, Lluisa and Lieber, Rochelle. 2000. “Sobre el prefijo ex-.” Paper presented at the Fourth Congress of General Linguistics, Cadiz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gussmann, Edmund. 1987. “The lexicon of English De-adjectival Verbs.” In: E. Gussmann (ed.), Rules and the Lexicon. Lublin: Catholic University Press, 79–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay. 2002. Prolegomena to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, Heidi and Noyer, Rolf. 2000. “Formal versus encyclopaedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalizations.” In: B. Peeters (ed.), The Lexcion-Encyclopedia Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 349–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 1996. “Word-class Changing inflection and Morphological Theory.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyvaert, Lisbiet. 2001. Deverbal-er suffixation as morphological equivalent of the clausal Subject-Finite unit. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Preprint 176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James. 1985. “On Semantics.” Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, Jack. 1985. Categorial Morphology. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, Jack. 1988. “Head-types in Morpho-Syntax.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1988. Dordrecht: Foris, 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence. 1989. Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; reprinted 2001 by CSLI: Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence. 2002. “Uncovering the Un-Word: A study in lexical pragmatics.” Sophia Linguistica 49, 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence. (Forthcoming). An Un-paper for the Un-Syntactician. Ms. Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, Richard. 1975. “Problems in the analysis of ed-adjectives.” Journal of Linguistics 11, 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1996. “The Architecture of the Linguistic-Spatial Interface.” In: P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, Otto. 1965. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part VI. Morphology. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastovsky, Dieter. 1969. “Wortbildung und Nullmorphem.” Linguistische Berichte 2, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettemann, Bernhard. 1988. Die Phonologie Morphologischer Prozesse im Amerikanischen Englisch. Tubingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyser, Samuel Jay and Roeper, Thomas. 1992. “Re: The Abstract Clitic Hypothesis.” Linguistic Inquiry 23, 89–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. “From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology.” In: H. van der Hulst and N. Smith, (eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations. Dordrecht: Foris, 131–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellmer, Goren. 2001. “Why weaken but not strongen on deadjectival verbs.” English Studies 2, 154–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, Barbara. 1996. “Multiple Geometric Representations of Objects in Languages and Language Learners.” In: P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 317–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, Robert. 1961. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehnert, Martin. 1971. Reverse Dictionary of Present-Day English. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, Adrienne. 1995. “Prefixes in English word-formation.” Folia Linguistica 29/1–2, 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Judith. 1978. The Syntax of Complex Nominals. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Beth. 1999. “Objecthood: an event structure perspective.” Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 35/1, 223–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Beth and Rappaport, Malka. 1988. “Non-event -er Nominals: A Probe into Argument Structure.” Linguistics 26, 1067–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Beth and Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. On the Organization of the Lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. [published by IULC, 1981 and Garland Press 1990.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, Rochelle. 1981. “Morphological conversion within a restrictive theory of the lexicon.” In: M. Moortgat, H. van der Hulst, and T. Hoekstra (eds.), The Scope of Lexical Rules. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 161–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, Rochelle. 1983. “Argument Linking and Compounds in English.” Linguistic Inquiry 14, 251–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing Morphology. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, Rochelle. 1998. “The Suffix -ize in English: Implications for Morphology.” In: S. G. Lapointe, D. K. Brentari, and P. M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 12–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, Rochelle and Baayen, Harald. 1997. “A Semantic Principle of Auxiliary Selection in Dutch.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15/4, 789–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, Rochelle and Baayen, Harald. 1999. “Nominalizations in a Calculus of Lexical Semantic Representations.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1998. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 175–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljung, Magnus. 1970. English denominal adjectives. Gothenburg Studies in English, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljung, Magnus. 1976. “-ed adjectives revisited.” Journal of Linguistics 12, 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahn, Lothar. 1971. Zur Morphologie und Semantik englischer Verben auf-IFY mit Berucksichtigung franzosischer und deutscher Entsprechungen. Tubingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, Hans. 1966. “On attributive and predicative derived adjectives and some problems related to the distinction.” Anglia 84, 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, Hans. 1966. “On the analysis of substantive compounds and suffixal derivatives not containing a verbal element.” Indogermanische Forschungen 70/1, 118–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, Hans. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word Formation. Munich: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynor, Natalie. 1979. “The morpheme un-.” American Speech 54, 310–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanan, K. P. 1986. The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1996. “Transfers of Meaning.” In: J. Pustejovsky and B. Boguraev (eds.), Lexical Semantics, the problem of polysemy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 109–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orgun, Cemil Orhan and Sprouse, Ronald. 1999. “From MPARSE to CONTROL: Deriving ungrammaticality.” Phonology 16/2, 191–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panther, Klaus and Thornburg, Linda. 1998. “The Polysemy of the Derivational -er Suffix in English.” Paper delivered at the Cognitive Morphology Workshop, Ghent, Belgium, July, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennanen, Esko. 1971. Conversion and Zero Derivation in English. Tampere: Acta Universitatis Tamperensis. Ser. A vol. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffelsiefen, Renate. 1996. Gaps in Word Formation. In: U. Kleinhenz (ed.), Interfaces in Phonology. Berlin: Academie Verlag, 194–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Levin, Beth. 1992. “-ER Nominals: implications for the theory of argument structure. In: T. Stowell and E. Wehrli (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 26, Syntax and the Lexicon. New York: Academic Press, 127–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Levin, Beth. 1998. “Building verb meanings.” In: M. Butt and W. Geuder (eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 97–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddle, Elizabeth. 1985. “A historical perspective on the productivity of the suffixes -ness and -ity.” In: J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Semantics Historical Word-Formation. Berlin. Mouton Publishers, 435–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, Thomas. 1988. “Compound Syntax and Head Movement.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1. Dordrecht: Foris, 187–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, Thomas. 1999. “Leftward Movement in Morphology.” In: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 34, 35–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, Thomas and van Hout, Angeliek. 1999. The impact of nominalization on passive,-able and middle: Burzio’s generalization and feature-movement in the lexicon. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, Thomas and Siegel, Muffy. 1978. “A Lexical Transformation for Verbal Compounds.” Linguistic Inquiry 9, 197–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romaine, Suzanne. 1983. “On the productivity of word formation rules and limits of variability in the lexicon.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 3, 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, Mary Ellen. 1999. “Bankers and blue-chippers: an account of -er formations in Present-day English.” English Language and Linguistics 3, 269–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Edgar. 1987. “Beobachtungen zur Pragmatik der verbbildenden Suffixe -en,-ify, und-ize im Englischen.” Sprachwissenschaft 12, 88–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Dorothy. 1974. Topics in English Morphology. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, John (ed.). The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotkin, Alan. 1990. “Adjectival -less and -free: A case of shifting institutional currency.” American Speech 65/1, 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Carlotta. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect (2nd edition). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southerland, Ronald. 1994. “Derivatives in pre-: a persuasive morphological resource?“ American Speech 69/2, 168–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Andrew. 1999. “Transpositions and Argument Structure.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1998. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 73–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproat, Richard. 1985. On deriving the lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Štekauer, Pavol. 1996. A Theory of Conversion in English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Štekauer, Pavol. 1998. An Onomasiological Theory of English Word-Formation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Steven. 1982. “On ‘relatedness paradoxes’ and related paradoxes.” Linguistic Inquiry 13, 694–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toman, Jindrich. 1983. Wortsyntax. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Andrea and Evans, Vyvyan. 2001. “Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over.” Language 77/4, 724–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Andrea and Evans, Vyvyan. 2004. The Semantics of English Prepositions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Marle, Jaap. 1985. On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walinska de Hackbeil, Hannah. 1986. The roots of phrase structure: The syntactic base of English morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Darrell. 1992. “English comparative compounds with OVER, UNDER, and OUT.” Proceedings of ESCOL 1992, 272–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin. 1981. “Argument Structure and Morphology.” Linguistic Review 1, 81–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin. 1981. “On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’.” Linguistic Inquiry 12/2, 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, Karl. 1964. Affixal Negation in English and Other Languages. Supplement to Word, Monograph No. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubizaretta, Maria Luisa. 1987. Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubizaretta, Maria Luisa and van Haaften, Ton. 1988. “English -ing and Dutch -en Nominal Constructions: A Case of Simultaneous Nominal and Verbal Projections.” In: M. Everaert, A. Evers, R. Huybrechts, and M. Trommelen (eds.), Morphology and Modularity. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 361–394.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English, University of New Hampshire, 95 Main Street, Durham, NH, 03824, USA

    Rochelle Lieber

Authors
  1. Rochelle Lieber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Prešov University, Prešov, Slovakia

    Pavol Štekauer

  2. University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA

    Rochelle Lieber

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lieber, R. (2005). English Word-Formation Processes. In: Štekauer, P., Lieber, R. (eds) Handbook of Word-Formation. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 64. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation