Skip to main content

Constraints on Productivity

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 64))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, Valerie. 1973. An Introduction to Modern English Word-Formation. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word-Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, Mark and Fuhrhop, Nanna. 2002. “Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: Closing suffixes and the monosuffix constraint.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20, 451–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, Mark and Sridhar, S. N. 1983. “Morphological levels in English and Kannada or Atarizing Reagan.” In: Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Chicago Linguistic Society, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, Harald and Schreuder, Robert. 2003. Morphological Structure in Language Processing. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Chris. 1998. “Episodic-ee in English: A thematic role constraint on new word formation.” Language 74, 695–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botha, Rudolf P. 1988. Form and Meaning in Word Formation. A Study of Afrikaans Reduplication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, Melissa. 1982. “Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development.” In: E. Wanner and L. R. Gleitman (eds.), Language Acquisition. The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 319–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1977. “Phono-morphological dissimilation.” In: W. U. Dressler and O. Pfeiffer (eds.), Phonologica 1976. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabb, Nigel. 1988. “English Suffixation is Constrained only by selectional restrictions.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6, 527–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giegerich, Heinz J. 1999. Lexical Strata in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, John. 1990. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Jennifer. 2002. “From speech perception to morphology: Affix-ordering revisited.” Language 78, 527–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Jennifer and Baayen, Harald. 2002. “Parsing and productivity.” In: G. E. Booij and J van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2001. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 203–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Jennifer and Plag, Ingo. (in press). “What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. “Lexical morphology and phonology.” In: Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanskin, 3–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krott, Andrea; Schreuder, Robert; and Baayen, Harald. 1999. “Complex words in complex words.” Linguistics 37, 905–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Beth and Rappaport, Malka. 1988. “Nonevent -er nominals: a probe into argument structure.” Linguistics 26, 1067–1083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, Rochelle. 1981. On the Organization of the Lexicon. Ph.D. MIT

    Google Scholar 

  • Malicka-Kleparska, Anna. 1985. “Parallel derivation and lexicalist morphology: The case of Polish diminutivization.” In: E. Gussmann (ed.), Phono-Morphology. Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw KUL, 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malicka-Kleparska, Anna. 1992. “Against phonological conditioning of WFRs.” In: J. Fisiak, Jacek and S. Puppel (eds.), Phonological Investigations. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 423–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marle, Jaap van. 1985. On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Productivity. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marle, Jaap van. 1986. “The Domain Hypothesis: The study of rival morphological processes.” Linguistics 24, 601–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menn, Lisa and Mac Whinney, Brian. 1984. “The Repeated Morph Constraint: Toward an explanation.” Language 60, 519–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag, Ingo. 1996. “Selectional restrictions in English suffixation revisited. A reply to Fabb (1988).” Linguistics 34, 769–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag, Ingo. 1998a. “Morphological haplology in a constraint-based morpho-phonology.” In: W. Kehrein and R. Wiese (eds.), Phonology and Morphology of the Germanic Languages. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 199–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag, Ingo. 1998b. “The polysemy of -ize derivatives: On the role of semantics in word formation”. In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1997. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 219–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag, Ingo. 2002 “The role of selectional restrictions, phonotactics and parsing in constraining suffix ordering in English.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 285–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, Frans. 1981. Morphologische (Ir-)Regularitäten. Aspekte der Wortstrukturtheorie. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffelsiefen, Renate. 1999. “Phonological constraints on English word formation.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1998. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 225–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, Franz. 1988. “Towards a theory of blocking: The case of Italian and German quality nouns.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1988. Dordrecht: Foris, 155–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, Franz. 1989. I nomi di qualità nell’italiano contemporaneo. Vienna: Braumüller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, Franz. 1993. Spanische Wortbildungslehre. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, Franz. 2000. “Produktivitätsbeschränkungen.” G. Booij, Ch. Lehmann, and J. Mugdan (eds.), Morphology. An International Handbbok on Inflection and Word-Formation. Volume 1. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 877–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, Franz. 2002. “Zum Problem der Suffixwahl im Bereich der Relationsadjektive zu spanischen Schriftstellernamen.” In: D. Kremer (ed.), Onomastik. Band V: Onomastik und Lexikographie, Deonomastik. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 115–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, Franz. 2003. “Semantic fragmentation in word-formation: The case of Spanish -azo.” In: R. Singh and S. Starosta (eds.), Explorations in Seamless Morphology. New Dehli/Thousand Oaks/London: SAGE, 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, Franz. 2004. “Studying restrictions on patterns of word-formation by means of the Internet.” Italian Journal of Linguistics 15, 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, Mary E. 1999. “Bankers and blue-chippers: An account of-er formations in Present-day English.” English Language and Linguistics 3, 269–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Dorothy. 1977. “The Adjacency Condition and the theory of morphology.” In: M. Stein (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst, Mass., 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Dorothy. 1979. Topics in English Morphology. New York: Garland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, Jeffrey L. and Snow, Catherine E. 1994 “The changing role of negative evidence in theories of language.” In: C. Gallaway and B. Richards (eds.), Input and Interaction in Language Acquistion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 38–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger, Joseph. 1981. “Morphological haplology”, Language 57, 791–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Steven L. 1982. “On relatedness paradoxes and related paradoxes”, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 694–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin. 1981. “On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’.” Linguistic Inquiry 12, 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, Moira. 1998. “Identity avoidance in phonology and morphology.” In: S. Lapointe, D. Brentari and P. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax. Stanford, Cal.: CSLI Publications, 216–246.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rainer, F. (2005). Constraints on Productivity. In: Štekauer, P., Lieber, R. (eds) Handbook of Word-Formation. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 64. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics