Skip to main content

Word-Formation in Natural Morphology

  • Chapter
Handbook of Word-Formation

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 64))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, Rolf H. and Schreuder, Robert. 1991. “War and peace: Morphemes and full forms in a non-interactive activation parallel route model.” Brain and Language 68, 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Laurie. 1996. “No phonetic iconicity in evaluative morphology.” Studia Linguistica 50, 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berko, Jean. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14. 150–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Andreas. 1988. “Is anything ‘more natural? Considerations on establishing a hierarchy of Naturalness Principles (NP).” Linguistische Studien A 188, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomer, Robert K. 1996. “Die pleonastischen Zusammensetzungen der deutschen Gegenwartssprache.” American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 8, 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert. 1992. “Compounding in Dutch.” Rivista di Linguistica 4, 37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert; Lehmann, Christian; and Mugdan, Joachim (eds.). 2000. Morphologie/Morphology I. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Eve; Hecht, Barbara; and Mulford, Randa C. 1986. “Coining complex compounds in English.” Linguistics 24, 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, Danielle. 1987. Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocco Galèas, Grazia. 1990. “Conversion as a morphological metaphor.” In: J. Méndez-Dosuna and C. Pensado (eds.), Naturalists at Krems. Salamanca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Salamanca, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocco Galèas, Grazia. 2003a. “The morphological technique of metaphoricity in English word-formation.” In: E. Mela Athanasopoulou (ed.), Selected Papers from the 15th International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University, School of English, 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocco Galèas, Grazia. 2003b. “Compound adjectives in English: the type lion-hearted and good-natured.” Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 32, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocco Galèas, Grazia and Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1992. “Trasparenza morfotattica e morfosemantica dei composti nominali più produttivi dell’italiano di oggi.” In: B. Moretti, D. Petrini and S. Bianconi (eds.), Atti del 25. Congresso Società di Linguistica Italiana. Roma: Bulzoni, 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Knop, Sabine. 1987. Metaphorische Komposita in Zeitungsüberschriften. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1982. “Zur semiotischen Begründung einer natürlichen Wortbildungslehre.” Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 8. 72–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1985a. “Typological aspects of Natural Morphology.” Wiener linguistische Gazette 36, 3–26 (reprinted in Acta Linguistica Hungarica 35, 1987, 51–70).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1985b. Morphonology. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1985c. “On the predictiveness of Natural Morphology.” Journal of Linguistics 21, 321–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1988a. „Zur Bedeutung der Sprachtypologie in der Natürlichen Morphologie.“ In: Albrecht, J. (ed.), Energeia und Ergon. Tübingen: Narr, Vol.3, 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1988b. „Preferences vs. strict universals in morphology: word based rules.“ In: M. Hammond and M. Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology. San Diego: Academic Press, 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1990. Semiotische Parameter einer textlinguistischen Natürlichkeitstheorie. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1994. “LSP ‘von aussen’: Reflections on the 9th European LSP symposium.” In: M. Brekke et al. (eds.), Applications and Implications of Current LSP Research. Bergen: Fagbogforlaget, 950–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1995. “Wealth and poverty of functional analyses, with special reference to functional deficiencies.” In: Sh. Miller and J. Mey (eds.), Form and Function in Language, Proceedings of the First Rasmus Rask Colloquium. Odense: Odense Univ. Press, 11–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1999. “On a semiotic theory of preferences in language.” In: M. Shapiro and M. Haley (eds.), Essays in Semiotic Analysis, The Peirce Semiotic Papers 4, 389–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2000a. “Naturalness.” In: G. Booij, C. Lehmann and J. Mugdan (eds.), Morphologie: ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung I. Berlin: de Gruyter, 288–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2000b. “Extragrammatical vs. marginal morphology.” In: U. Doleschal and A. M. Thornton (eds.), Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology. München: Lincom, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2002a. “Naturalness and functionalism.” In: K. Dziubalska-Kolaczyk and J. Weckwerth (eds.), Future Challenges for Natural Linguistics. München: Lincom. 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2002b. “Naturalness and morphological change.” In: B. D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. and Karpf, Annemarie. 1995. “The theoretical relevance of pre-and protomorphology in language acquisition.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1994. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. and Ladányi, Mária. 2000. “Productivity in Word Formation: a morphological approach.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47, 103–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U.; Mayerthaler, Willi; Panagl, Oswald; and Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1987. Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. and Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia. 1994. Morphopragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia. 2001. “Morphopragmatics of diminutives and augmentatives.” In: I. Kenesei and R. M. Harnish (eds.), Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felber, Helmut and Budin, Gerhard. 1989. Terminologie in Theorie und Praxis. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauenfelder, Uli H. and Schreuder, Robert. 1992. “Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: the role of productivity.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 165–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Christopher. 1992. Morphology and Mind. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, Roman. 1941. Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, John T. 1990. Morphology: Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilani-Schoch, Marianne. 1988. Introduction à la morphologie naturelle. Bern: Lang

    Google Scholar 

  • Koj, Leon. 1979. “The principle of transparency and semantic antinomies.” In: J. Pelc (ed.), Semiotics in Poland. Dordrecht: Reidel, 376–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libben, Gary. 1998. “Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: consequences for representation, processing and impairment.” Brain and Language 61, 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. “Compounding in English.” Rivista di Linguistica. 4, 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayerthaler, Willi. 1981. Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion (English translation: 1988. Morphological Naturalness. Ann Arbor: Karoma Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez Dosuna, Julián and Pensado, Carmen. 1990. “How unnatural is Spanish Víctor → Vict-ít-or? Infixed diminutives in Spanish.” In: Méndez Dosuna, J. and Pensado, C. (eds.), Naturalists at Krems. Salamanca: Acta Salmanticensia, Estudios Filologicos 227, 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Ralf. 1992. Compound Comprehension in Isolation and in Context. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Susan. 2001. “Copulative compounds: a closer look at the interface between syntax and morphology.” In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2000. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 279–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles S. 1965. Collected Papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag, Ingo. 2004. “Syntactic category information and the semantics of derivational morphological rules.” Folia Linguistica 38, 193–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, Franz. 1993. Spanische Wortbildungslehre. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, Franz. 2001. “Compositionality and paradigmatically determined allomorphy in Italian word-formation.” In: C. Schaner-Wolles, J. Rennison, and F. Neubarth (eds.), Naturally! Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier, 383–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke. 1980. Sprachverwendung, Sprachsystem, Ökonomie und Wandel. Tübingen: Niemeyer

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalise, Sergio. 1992. “Compounding in Italian.” Rivista di Linguistica 4, 175–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Bernd M. 1984. Prolegomena zuu einer einheitlichen Zeichentheorie. Stuttgart: Stauffenburg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiler, Hansjakob. 1991. “Die Prinzipien der deskriptiven und der etikettierenden Benennung.” In: H. Seiler (ed.), Linguistic Workshop 3, 2–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Howard J. 1979. Motivierte Komposita in der deutschen und englischen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Dorothy. 1977. “The adjacency constraint and the theory of morphology.” NELS 8, 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skalička, Vladimír. 1979. Typologische Studien. Braunschweig: Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stampe, David. 1973. “On Chapter Nine.” In: M. Kenstowicz and Ch. Kisseberth (eds.), Issues in Phonological Theory. The Hague: Mouton, 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Marle, Jaap. 1985. On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennemann, Theo. 1983. “Theories of linguistic preferences as a basis for linguistic explanations.” Folia linguistica historica 4, 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Max W. 1993. “On the hierarchy of naturalness principles in inflectional morphology.” Journal of Linguistics 29, 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijnen, Frank; Kempen, Masja; and Gillis, Steven. 2001. “Root infinitives in Dutch early child language: an effect of input.” Journal of Child Language 28, 629–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin. 1981. “Argument structure and morphology.” Linguistic Review 1, 81–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, Dieter. 1986. “Probleme der Wortstruktur.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 5, 209–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1984. Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1988a. “The structuralist heritage in Natural Morphology.” Linguistische Studien A 188, 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1988b. “Hermann Paul — Analogie und die Natürliche Morphologie.” Zeitschrift für Germanistik 5, 537–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1994. “Grammatisch initiierter Wandel.” In: Jeßing, B. (ed.), Sprachdynamik. Auf dem Weg zu einer Typologie sprachlichen Wandels. Bochum: Brockmeyer, Vol.1, 7–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwanenburg, Wiecher 1992a. “Compounding in French.” Rivista di Linguistica 4, 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwanenburg, Wiecher 1992b. “La composition dans les langues romanes et germaniques: essuie-glace / wind-shield wiper.” OTS Working Papers. OTS-WP-TL, 92–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, Arnold M. and Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1987. “Plain morphology and expressive morphology.” In: J. Aske, N. Beery, L. Michaelis and H. Filip (eds.), Proceedings of the 13 th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 330–340.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dressler, W.U. (2005). Word-Formation in Natural Morphology. In: Štekauer, P., Lieber, R. (eds) Handbook of Word-Formation. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 64. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics