This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Typological Studies in Language, Vol. 9. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and natural language use. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fillmore, Charles J.; Kay, Paul; and O’Connor, Mary Kay. 1988. “Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone.” Language 64, 501–538.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hinton, Leanne; Nichols, Johanna; and Ohala, John J. (eds.) 1994. Sound symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive grammar: Vol. I, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991a. Foundations of Cognitive grammar: Vol. II, Descriptive application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991b. Concept, image, and symbol: the cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2000. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Moore, Terence, and Carling, Christine. 1982. Language understanding: Towards a post-Chomskyan linguistics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. “On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories.” In: T. E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, 111–144. New York: Academic Press.
Reddy, Michael J. 1979. “The Conduit metaphor — A case of frame conflict in our language about language.” In: A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 284–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rhodes, Richard A., and Lawler, John M. 1981. “Athematic metaphors.” CLS 17, 318–342.
Sereno, Joan A., and Jongman, Allard. 1997. “Processing of English inflectional morphology.” Memory and Cognition 25, 425–37.
Taylor, John R. 2002. Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tuggy, David. 1985. “The inflectional/derivational distinction.” Workpapers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics at UND 29, 209–222. Grand Forks, ND: SIL.
Tuggy, David. 1992. “The affix-stem distinction; A Cognitive grammar analysis of data from Orizaba Nahuatl.” Cognitive Linguistics 3/3, 237–300.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tuggy, D. (2005). Cognitive Approach to Word-Formation. In: Štekauer, P., Lieber, R. (eds) Handbook of Word-Formation. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 64. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3595-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3596-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)