Advertisement

Consumer Needs Regarding Dietetic Products for Pregnant and Lactating Women and for Baby Foods

Focus Group Meeting
  • Monique Raats
  • Kaisa Poutanen
  • Maria Almeida
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 569)

Abstract

This meeting discussed the regulation, marketing and communication needs of these products from a consumer point of view. It was agreed, that clear and consistent messages are needed from health professionals, public authorities, industry and also the media. There is also a need to better understand the context in which choices of products are made. Research into these topics is reviewed in this paper, but it is obvious that more research into consumer and health professional behaviour is needed. This will allow best practices for communication of the use of dietetic foods for the important consumer group of lactating mothers and young parents.

Keywords

Food Choice Infant Feeding Baby Food Lactate Mother Protection Motivation Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson AA, Guthrie CA, Alder EM, Forsyth S, Howie PW, Williams FLR. Rattling the plate—reasons and rationales for early weaning Health Educ Res 2001; 16:471–479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bleakney GM, McErlain S. Infant feeding guidelines: an evaluation of their effect on health professionals’ knowledge and attitudes. J Hum Nut Diet 1996; (9): 437–450.Google Scholar
  3. Fewtrell MS, Lucas A, Morgan JB. Factors associated with weaning in full term and preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88(4):F296–F301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fishbein M. Predicting, understanding and changing socially relevant behaviors: lessons learned. In: McGarty C, Haslam SA, editors. The message of social psychology, Oxford: Blackwell; 1997, p. 77–91.Google Scholar
  5. Foote K, Marriott L. Weaning in infancy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88:488–492.Google Scholar
  6. Freed GL, Clark SJ, Lohr JA, Sorenson JR. Paediatrician involvement in breast feeding promotion: a national study of residents and practitioners. Pediatr 1995; 96: 490–494.Google Scholar
  7. Hobbie C, Baker S, Bayer C. (2000). Parental understanding of basic infant nutrition: misinformed feeding choices. J Pediatr Health Care 2000; 14:26–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hyde L. Knowledge of basic infant nutrition amongst community health professionals. Matern Child Nurs J 1994; 19:27–32.Google Scholar
  9. Jeffrey RW. Risk behaviors and health: contrasting individual and population perspectives. Am Psychol 1989;44:1194–202.Google Scholar
  10. Henderson L, Kitzinger J, Green J. Representing infant feeding: content analysis of British media portrayals of bottle feeding and breast feeding. BMJ 2000;321:1196–1198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lanigan JA, Bishop J, Kimber AC, Morgan J. Systematic review concerning the age of introduction of complementary foods to the healthy full-term infant. Eur J Clin Nutr 2001; 55(5):309–320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Morgan J, Lucas A, Fewtrell MS. Does weaning influence growth and health up to 18 months? Arch Dis Child. In pressGoogle Scholar
  13. Morgan J, Taylor A, Fewtrell MS. Meat consumption during weaning is positively associated with psychomotor outcome in children under 22 months of age. Arch Dis Child 2003; 88:837Google Scholar
  14. Morgan JB, Kimber AC, Redfern AM, Stordy BJ. Healthy eating for infants — mothers’ attitudes. Acta Paediatr 1995; 84:512–515.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy EA, Parker S, Phipps C. Competing agendas in infant feeding. Br Food J 1998; 100(3):128–132.Google Scholar
  16. Murphy EA, Parker S, Phipps C. Motherhood, morality, and infant feeding, in Williams, L. and Germov, J. (eds), The Social Appetite: An Introduction to the Sociology of Food and Nutrition, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1999. pp. 242–258.Google Scholar
  17. Nestle M, Wing R, Birch L, DiSogra L, Drewnowski A, Middleton S, Sigman-Grant M, Sobal J, Winston M, Economos C. Behavioral and social influences on food choice. Nutr Rev 1998; 56(5):S50–S64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Raats MM, Thorpe L, Hurren C, Elliott K. Changing Preconceptions. Volume 2. The HEA Folic Acid Campaign 1995–1998. Research Report. London: Health Education Authority; 1998. p. 94.Google Scholar
  19. Rogers RW. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In: Cacioppo J, Petty R, editors. Social Psychophysiology, New York: Guilford; 1983. p. 153–76.Google Scholar
  20. Urala N, Arvola, A and Lähteenmäki L. Strength of health-related claims and their perceived advantage. Int J Food Sci Technol 2003; 38:815.Google Scholar
  21. Urala N, Lähteenmäki L. Attitudes behind consumers’ willingness to buy functional foods. Food Qual Pref in pressGoogle Scholar
  22. Werk L, Alpert J. Solid feeding guidelines. Lancet 1998; 352:1569.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams A, Pinnington LL. Nurses’ knowledge of current guidelines for infant feeding and weaning. Journal of Hum Nutr Dietet 2003; 16(2): 73–80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monique Raats
    • 1
  • Kaisa Poutanen
    • 2
  • Maria Almeida
    • 3
  1. 1.Consumer Behaviour and Health Research CentreUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK
  2. 2.Food and Health Research InstituteUniversity of Kuopio, MeditekniaKuopioFinland
  3. 3.Molecular Medicine InstituteUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations