Skip to main content

Modern Economic Theory and the Challenge of Embedded Tenure Institutions: African Attempts to Reform Local Forest Policies

  • Chapter
Institutions, Sustainability, and Natural Resources

Part of the book series: Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources ((SENR,volume 2))

Abstract

Customary tenure, mingled with state law and occasional private titling, continue predominantly to govern African rural and forest lands. This is in spite of evolutionist theories that predicted its demise and colonial and post-colonial policies that tried actively to accelerate it. The chapter develops an anthropological conceptualization of the institutions of embedded tenure. With examples from Africa and various parts of the world, we highlight the factors that account for the flexibility, adaptability and resilience of this type of system. Embedded tenure has been able to cope with economic stress and hostile policies because of the unique way in which it nests private entitlements into the commons, and both of them into collective property and long-lasting social institutions. Two philosophical principles giving rise to three constitutional rights and four appropriations regimes make up its structure, while dynamic access and transformation rules govern the interlocking and transmutations of appropriation regimes across space and time. This opens three specific paths of agricultural change as well profuse right delegation and land transaction procedures. These have helped the system adapt to changing economic, demographic and social conditions since at least the 19th century. Reductionist economic analyses of non-market systems, including property rights, kinship, common property and non-wage systems, contributed to relegating the most innovative aspects of these systems to the limbo of imperfect markets. More interested in ‘crafted’ institutions, the CPR literature also failed to see or emphasize the theoretical and policy implications of the nesting of appropriation regimes in embedded tenure. Other analyses have tended to overemphasize the controversial role of traditional authority at the expense of a deeper institutional analysis of the embedded system. The chapter highlights the numerous policy mistakes that can derive from these forms of reductionism. We conclude that, to disentangle African forest policies from the social costs and inefficiencies of the past, it is necessary to integrate the complexity and validity of embedded tenure institutions and their demonstrated ability to adapt to legal pluralism and commodity markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adesina, A.A., Nkamleu, G., & Mbila, D. (1998). Land and tree property rights and farmers’ investment in alley farming in Cameroon. For review, Land Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adeyoju, S.K. (1976). Land tenure and tropical forestry development. FAO committee on forest development in the tropics, 4th session. Rome 15–20 Nov, 36 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agbosu, L.K. (2000) Land law in Ghana: Contradiction between Anglo-American and customary tenure conceptions and practices. Working Paper 33, Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agondjo-Okawe, P.L. (1970). Les droits fonciers coutumiers au Gabon (Société Nkomi, Groupe Myene). Revue Juridique et Politique, Indépendance et Coopération, XXIV,4, 1135–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A.A., & H. Demsetz (1972). Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62, 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexandre, P. (1965). Protohistoire du groupe Béti-Fang. Essai de systématisation. Cahiers d’Études Africaines, 5, 503–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L.G. (1982). The share system in open-access and optimally regulated fisheries. Land Economics, 58(4), 435–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T.L., & HILL, P.J. (1984) Privatizing the commons: An improvement? Journal of Southern Economic Review, 51, 438–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • André, C., & Delville, P.L (1998) Changements fonciers et dynamiques agraires. Le Rwanda, 1900–1990. In P. L. Delville (Ed.), Quelles politiques foncières pour l’Afrique rurale. Réconcilier pratiques, légitimité et légalité (pp 157–182). Paris: Karthala — Coopération française,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelsen, A. (1997). The evolution of private property rights in traditional agriculture: Theories and a study from Indonesia. WP1997:6, Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anyangwe, C. (1984). Land tenure and interests in land in Cameroonian indigenous law. Cameroon Law Review, 27, 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J.E.M. (1991). Foresterie communautaire. Un examen de dix ans d’activité. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1983). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baak, B. (1982) Testing the impact of exclusive property rights: The case of enclosing common fields. In R.L. Ransom, R. Sutch, G.M. Walton (Eds.), Exploration in the new economic history (pp. 257–272). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahuchet, S. (1996). La mer et la forêt: Ethnoécologie des populations forestières et des pêcheurs du sud-Cameroun. In A. Froment, I. De Garine, C. Binam Bikoi, J.F. Loung (Eds), Anthropologie alimentaire et développement en Afrique intertropicale: Du biologique au social (pp. 145–154). Actes du colloque tenu à Yaoundé (1993). Paris: ORSTOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P.K., & Srinivasan, T.N. (1971). Crop sharing tenancy in agriculture. A theoretical and empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 61, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C., (1977). Alternative theories of sharecropping. Some tests using evidence from Northeast India. Journal of Development. Studies, 13(4), 317–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesbrouck, K. (2002). New perspectives on forest dynamics and the myth of ‘communities’: Reconsidering co-management in tropical rainforests in Cameroon. IDS bulletin, 33(1), 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigombe Logo, P. (2002). Économie politique de la performance de la fiscalité forestière décentralisée au Cameroun: Logique d’État et gestion locale en question. Washington: WRI, CIFOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Farvar, M.T., Nguinguiri, J.C., & Ndangang, V.A. (2000). Co-management of natural resources: Organising, negotiating and learning-by-doing. Kasparek Verlag, Heidelberg (Germany): GTZ and IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (1998). Cadastre, corruption, and the commons: The privatization and persistence of the commons in North-East Nepal. Paper presented at the International Association of Common Property Conference, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce J.W. (Ed.) (1988). A perspective on indigenous land tenure systems and land concentration. In R.E. Downs, S.P. Reyna (Eds), Land and Society t in Contemporary Africa (pp. 23–52). Hanover, London: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce J.W. (Ed.) (1998). Country profiles of land tenure: Africa, 1996. LTC Research Paper 130, Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J.L.F, & Nhira, C. (1993). Tenures in transition, tenures in conflict: Examples from the Zimbabwe social forest. Rural Sociology, 58(4), 626–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J.W., & Migot-Adhola, S.E. (Eds.) (1994) Searching for land tenure security in Africa. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J.W., Migot-Adhola, S.E. & Atherton J. (1994). The findings and their policy implications: Institutional adaptation or replacement. In J.W. Bruce, & S.E. Migot-Adhola (Eds.), Searching for land tenure security in Africa (pp.251–265). Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J.W., Subramanian, J., Knox, A., Bohrer, K., & Leisz, S. (1998a). Synthesis of trends and issues raised by land tenure country profiles of greater Horn of Africa countries. In J.W. Bruce (Ed.), Country profiles of land tenure: Africa, 1996 (pp. 137–200). LTC Research Paper 130, Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, E.J., Cloeck-Jenson, S., Knox, A., Subramanian, J., & Williams, M. (1998b) Land tenure country profiles, southern Africa, 1996. In J.W. Bruce (Ed.), Country profiles of land tenure: Africa, 1996 (pp. 201–282). LTC Research Paper 130, Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttoud, G. (1997). The influence of history in African forest policies: A comparison between Anglophone and Francophone countries. Commonwealth Forestry Review, 76(1), 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cernea, M. (Ed.) (1991). Putting people first. Sociological variables in rural development (2nd Edition). The World Bank, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S. (1968). Private property rights and sharecropping. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 1107–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S. (1969) The theory of share tenancy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilchinsky, G. (2004) Property rights and the efficiency of markets for environmental services. Chapater 7, in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V., & Bishop, R.C. (1975). ’Common property’ as a concept in natural resource policy. Natural Resources Journal, 15, 713–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. (1984). The new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 140, 229–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coquery-Vidrovitch, C. (1982). Le régime foncier rural en Afrique Noire. In E. Lebris, E. Le Roy, F. Leimdorfer (Eds.), Enjeux Fonciers en Afrique Noire (pp. 65–84). Paris: Karthala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, S.K., & Nugent, J.B. (1989). Transaction cost economics and contractual choice: Theory and evidence. In J.B. Nugent, M.K. Nabli (Eds), The new institutional economics and development. Theory and applications to Tunisia (pp. 34–79). Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, Tokyo: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L.E., & North, D.C (1971). Institutional change and American economic growth. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57, 347–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaw, M.C., & Oyono, R.P. (1998). Dynamique et representation des espaces forestiers au sud-Cameroun: Pour une relecture sociale des paysages. Arbres, Forêts et Communautés Rurales, 15–16, 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaw, M.C., & Njomkap, (1998). La Terre et le Droit: Une anthropologie institutionnelle de la tenure foncière et de la jurisprudence chez les peuples bantu et pygmées du Cameroun méridional forestier. Yaounde: Inades-Formation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaw, M.C., 1985-La pêche piroguière dans l’économie politique de l’Afrique de l’Ouest. Les formations sociales et les systèmes de production dans l’histoire. 45e congrès des américanistes, Bogota, 1–7 juillet, 38 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaw, M.C. (1989). Partage et appropriation: le système de part et la gestion des unités de pêche. Cahiers Sciences Humaines, 25(1–2), 67–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaw, M.C. (1994). La portée du partage. Les implications théoriques et épistémologiques du système de parts pour l’étude de l’altérité en économie. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, Laval University, Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaw, M.C. (1997). Si, Nda bot and Ayong: Shifting cultivation, land use and property rights in southern Cameroon. Rural Development Forestry Network Paper 21e.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaw, M.C. (2002). L’altérité des tenures forestières: les théories scientifiques et la gestion des biens communs. Informations et Commentaires, 121, 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle, A.A. (2001). From village land to “Native Reserve”: Changes in property rights in Sabah, Malaysia, 1950—1996. Human Ecology, 29(1), 69–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egbe, S. (1997). Forest tenure and access to forest resources in Cameroon. An overview. Forest Participation Series 6, International Institute for Environment and Development, IIED, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, K., Bohrer, K., Furth, R., Hobbs, M., Knox, A., Leisz, S., & Williams, M. (1998). Land tenure country profiles, West Africa 1996. In J.W. Bruce (Ed.), Country profiles of land tenure: Africa, 1996 (pp. 1–136). LTC Research Paper 130, Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, C.C., de Foresta, H., Sirait, M.T., & Tomich, T.P. n.d. A Policy breakthrough for Indonesian farmers in the Krui damar agroforests. Agroforestry today, in press (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.J. (1989). Indigenous systems of common property forest management in Nepal. Working Paper No. 18, East-West Center, Honolulu, Hawai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisiy, C. (1990). Peasant resistance to land law reform. XIV Congress of the European Society for Rural Sociology, July, Giessen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, P. (1983). Law, plurality and underdevelopment. In D. Sugarman (Ed.), Legality, ideology and the state (pp. 159–181). London, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaaten, O. (1981). Resource allocation and share-systems in fish harvesting firms. Resources paper 72, PRNE Resources Discussion Series. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortman, L., & Bruce, J. (1988). Whose tress? Proprietary dimensions of forestry. Boulder: Westwiew Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodland, R. (1991). Tropical deforestation. Solutions, ethics and religion. Environment Working Paper 43, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, H.S. (1953). An economic approach to the optimum utilization of fisheries resources. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 10, 442–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guigou, B., Lericolais, A., & Pontié, G. (1998). La gestion foncière en pays sereer siin (Sénégal). In L. Delville (Ed.), Quelles politiques foncières pour l’Afrique rurale? Réconcilier pratiques, légitimité et légalité (pp. 183–196). Paris: Karthala — Coopération française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guijt, I., & Meera, K.S. (Eds.) (1999). The myth of community. Gender issues in participatory development. London: Intermediate Technologies Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P. (1987). The greening of Africa. London: Paladin Grafton Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral hasard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, S.C. (1969). History, economics, and anthropology: The work of Karl Polanyi. History and Theory, 8(2), 165–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, S. (2000). A dynamic approach to forest regimes in developing economies. Ecological Economics, 32, 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, S. (2003). Economic theory of emerging forest property rights. Conference Proceedings (the XII World Forest Congress, Quebec City, Canada, September 21–28, 2003): C-People and Forests in Harmony, pp.207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, S., & Berry, R.A. (2001). A theoretical model of optimal forest resource regimes in developing economies. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 157(2), 331–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsenty, A. (1996). Marchandisation imparfaite de la terre en Côte d’Ivoire. In E. Le Roy, A. Karsenty, A. Bertrand (Eds.), La sécurisation foncière en Afrique (p. 22). Paris: Karthala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavigne Delville, P. (Ed.) (1998). Quelles politiques foncières pour l’Afrique rurale? Réconcilier pratiques, légitimité et légalité. Paris: Karthala — Coopération française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavigne Delville, P., Toulmin, C., Colin, J.P., Chauveau, J.P. (2001). L’accès à la terre par les procédures de lélégation foncière (Afrique de l’Ouest rurale): Modalités, dynamiques et enjeux. Paris: IIED, GRET, IRD RÉFO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawry, S., Stienbarger, D., & Jabbar, D. (1995). Land tenure and the adoption of alley farming in West Africa. pp. 464–471 In B.T. Kang, A.O. Osiname, A. Larbi (Eds.), Alley farming research and development: Proceedings of the international conference on alley farming, 14–18 September 1992, Ibadan, Nigeria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, R., & Longbottom, J. (2000). Land tenure lexicon: A glossary of terms from English and French speaking West Africa. London: IIED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplaideur, A. (1985). Les systèmes agricoles en zone forestièere: les paysans du Centre et du Sud Cameroun. Paris: CIRAD-IRAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, E., Karsenty, A., & Bertrand, A. (1996). La sécurisation foncière en Afrique: Pour une gestion viable des ressources renouvelables. Paris: Karthala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N., & van der Ploeg, J.D. (1994). Heterogeneity, actor and structure: Towards a reconstitution of the concept of structure. In D. Booth (Ed.), Rethinking social development. Theory, research and practice (pp. 62–89). Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. (1992). From paradigm lost to paradigm regained? The case for an actor-oriented sociology of development. In N. Long, A. Long, (Eds.), Battlefields of knowledge. The interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development (pp. 17–43). London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, F. (1994). Un-customary laws: Issues for research into land rights, Kenya. Paper prepared for the Conference on Gender and the Politics of Environmental Sustainability, Centre for Africa Studies, university of Edinburgh, 25–26 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject. Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlon, P. (1994). Indigenous land use systems and investments in soil fertility in Burkina Faso. In J.W. Bruce, S.E. Migot-Adhola (Eds.), Searching for land tenure security in Africa (pp. 41–69). Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCay, B. J. (2002). Emergence of institutions for the commons: Contexts, situations, and events. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E.U. Weber (Eds.), The Drama of the commons (pp.361–402). Wahsington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, L., Leach, M., Newell, P., Soones, I., Sivaramakrishnan, K. & Way, S.A. (1999). Exploring understandings of institutions and uncertainty: New Directions in natural resource management. IDS Discussion Paper 37, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melone, S. (1972). La parenté et la terre dans la stratégie du développement. Yaounde/Paris: Klinksienck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S.E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law and Society Review, 22, 869–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, G., de Foresta, H., & Levang, P. (1995). Stratégies agroforestières paysannes et développement durable: Les agroforêts à damar de Sumatra. Nature, Science et Société, 3(3), 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migot-Adhola, S.E., Bennet, G., Place, F., & Atsu, S. (1994). Land, security of tenure, and productivity in Ghana. In J.W. Bruce, S.E. Migot-Adhola (Eds.), Searching for land tenure security in Africa (pp. 97–118). Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mope Simo, J.A. (1998). Systèmes fonciers coutumiers et politiques foncières au Nord-Ouest Cameroun. Pp.81–102 In P. Lavigne, P. Delville, C. Toulmin, S. Traoré (Eds.), Gérer le foncier rural en Afrique de l’Ouest. Dynamiques foncières et interventions publiques. Paris/St. Louis (Sénégal): Karthala URED,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L.H. (1971) (1877). La société archaïque. Paris: Anthropos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisset, M., & Reveret, J.P. (1985). Les quota individuels dans l’agriculture et la pêche: une analyse critique. In agriculture et politiques agricoles: transformations économiques et sociales au Québec et en France. Co-edition L’Harmattan/Boréal Express.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabli, M.K., & Nugent J. B. (eds), (1989). The new institutional economics and economic development: An introduction. In J.B. Nugent & M.K. Nabli (Eds.), The new institutional economics and development. Theory and applications to Tunisia (pp 3–33). North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newberry, D.M.G. (1974). Cropsharing tenancy in agriculture: Comment. American Economic Review, 64(6), 1060–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngwasiri, N.F. (1984). The impact of the present land tenure reforms in Cameroon on the former West Cameroon. Cameroon Law Review, 27, 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C., & Thomas, R. (1973). The rise of the western world. A new economic history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. (1977). Non market forms of economic organization. The challenge of Karl Polanyi. Journal of European Economic History (Fall).

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, J., & Platteau, J.P. (1989). Contractual relationships and their rationale in marine fishing. Miméo, University of Southern California/Faculté Notre-Dame-de-la-Paix, Namur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1992). Crafting institutions for self-governing irrigation systems. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary r Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyono, P.R. (1998). Création et promotion des forêts communautaires au Cameroun. Aperçu général, contraintes socio-anthropologiques et alternatives théoriques. Yaoundé: WWF-CPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescay, M. (1998). Transformation des systèmes fonciers et « transition foncière » au Sud-Bénin. In Lavigne Delvigne, P. (Ed), Quelles politiques foncières pour l’Afrique rurale? Réconcilier pratiques, légitimité et légalité (pp 131–156). Paris: Karthala-Coopération française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Place, F., Roth, M., & Hazel, P. (1994). Land tenure security and agricultural performance in Africa: Overview of research methodology. In J.W. Bruce, S.E. Migot-Adholla, Searching for land tenure security in Africa (pp. 15–39). Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platteau, J.P. (1989). La contribution de la nouvelle économie institutionnelle pour l’analyse des relations contractuelles et des formes organisationnelles dans le secteur de la pêche maritime. In «La Recherche face à la pêche artisanale», Contributions Provisoires, Livre 2: 749–764. Montpellier: ORSTOM-IFREMER,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platteau, J.P. (1992a). Small-scale fisheries and the evolutionist theory of institutional development. In I. Tvedten, B. Hersoug, (Eds.), Fishing for development. Small-scale fisheries in Africa (pp. 91–114). Uppsala: The Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platteau, J.P. (1992b).-Formalization and privatization of land rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: A critique of current orthodoxies and structural adjustment programmes. Research Seminars in Rural Development Studies Institute of Social Studies, 50 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polaniyi, K. (1944). The origins of our time: The great transformation. New York: Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polaniyi, K. (1957). The Economy m as an instituted process. In K. Polaniyi, C.M. Arensberg, H.W. Pearson (Eds.), Trade and markets in the early empires. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi Levitt, K. (2003). The English experience in the life and work of Karl Polanyi. Paper for Conference Proceedings, Polanyian Perspectives on Instituted Economic Processes, Development and Transformation. ESRC, Center for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester, October 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J.N, Kaosa-Ard, A., Boone, T.E., Diaw, M.C., Edwards, K., Kadyschuk, S., Kaosa-Ard, M., Lang, T., Preechapanya, P., Rerkasem, K., & Rune, F. (2000). For whom and for what? Principles, criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management in Thailand. Study Report, The Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute/Chiang Mai Univ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A.F. (1980). On sharecropping. Man, 15(3), 411–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A.F. (1987). The dynamics of productive relationships. African share contracts in historical perspective. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robiglio, V., Mala, W.A., & Diaw, M.C. (2003). Mapping landscapes: Integrating GIS and social science methods to model human-nature relationships in Southern Cameroon. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 2(2), 171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau, D., & Edmunds, D. (1997). Women, men and trees: Gender, power and property in forest and agrarian landscapes. World Development, 25(8), 1351–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C.M. (1994). Property and persuasion: Essays on the history, theory, and rhetoric of ownership. Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoir, C. (1995). Les groupes socio-culturels. In C. Santoir, A. Bopda (Eds.). Atlas regional du sud Camreoun. MINREST/Institut national de cartographie (pp. 15–18). Paris: ORSTOM Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B.S. (1987). Law: A map of misreading. Toward a postmodern conception of law. Journal of Law and Society, 14(3), 279–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simukonda, H.P. (1992). Land tenure change on customary land as a strategy for agricultural and rural development: A critical analysis of its relevance in a Malawian case. Journal of Rural Developmen Hyderabad, 11(4), 377–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirait, M.T. (1997). Simplifying natural resources: A descriptive study of village land use planning Initiatives. In W. Kalimantan, M.A. Thesis, Ateneio de Manila University, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R. (1989). Tenancy contracts during transition: A study based on fieldwork in Uttar Pradesh (India). Journal. of Peasant Studies, 16(3), 339–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. (1974). Incentives and risk sharing in sharecropping. Review of Economic Studies, 41, 126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, J. (1998). Swaziland country profile. In J.W. Bruce (Ed.), Country profiles of land tenure: Africa, 1996 (pp. 161–165). LTC Research Paper 130, Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderlin, W. (2003). Ideology, social theory and the environment. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutinen, J. (1979). Fishermen remuneration systems and implications for fisheries development. Scottish Journal of political economy, 26(2), 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjouen, A.D. (1982). Droits domaniaux et techniques foncières en droit Camerounais (Étude d’une réforme législative). Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, R. & Wiseman, J. (Eds.) (1956). Proceeding of a round table organized by the International Economic Association. FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandergeest, P. (1996). Mapping nature: Territorialization of forest rights in Thailand. Society and Natural Resources, 9, 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vansina, J. (1982). The peoples of the forest. In D. Birmingham, P.M. Martin (Eds.), History of Central Africa (Vol. 1, pp. 75–117). Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vansina, J. (1990). Paths in the rainforests. Toward a history of political tradition in Equatorial Africa. Madison: The University of Wisconcin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdier, R. (1971). Evolution et réformes foncières de l’Afrique noire francophone. Journal of African Law, 15(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J., (1977). Structures agraires et évolution des milieux ruraux: Le cas de la région cacaoyère du Centre-sud Cameroon, Paris: ORSTOM,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, (1974). Land Reform. World Bank Development Series. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoeteweij, H. (1956). Fishermen’s remuneration. In R Turvey, J. Wiseman (Eds.), The economics of fisheries (pp. 18–41). Proceeding of a Round Table organized by the International Economic Association, FAO, Rome, September.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Diaw, M.C. (2005). Modern Economic Theory and the Challenge of Embedded Tenure Institutions: African Attempts to Reform Local Forest Policies. In: Kant, S., Berry, R.A. (eds) Institutions, Sustainability, and Natural Resources. Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3519-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics