Abstract
The Kyoto Protocol (KP) requires signatories to reduce CO2-equivalent emissions by an average of 5.2% from 1990 levels by the commitment period 2008–2012. This constitutes only a small proportion of global greenhouse gas emissions. Importantly, countries can attain a significant portion of their targets by sequestering carbon in terrestrial ecosystems in lieu of emission reductions. Since carbon sink activities lead to ephemeral carbon storage, forest management and other activities that enhance carbon sinks enable countries to buy time as they develop emission reduction technologies. Although many countries are interested in sink activities because of their presumed low cost, the analysis in this paper suggests otherwise. While potentially a significant proportion of required CO2 emission reductions can be addressed using carbon sinks, it turns out that, once the opportunity cost of land and the ephemeral nature of sinks are taken into account, costs of carbon uptake could be substantial. Carbon uptake via forest activities varies substantially depending on location (tropical, Great Plains, etc.), activity (forest conservation, tree planting, management, etc.), and the assumptions and methods upon which the cost estimates are based. Once one eliminates forestry projects that should be pursued because of their biodiversity and other non-market benefits, or because of their commercial profitability, there remain few projects that can be justified purely on the grounds that they provide carbon uptake benefits.
Research funding from the BIOCAP/SSHRC joint initiative and the Canada Research Chairs Program is gratefully acknowledged. Subject to the usual proviso, the authors wish to thank David Boulter, Albert Berry and Shashi Kant for their insightful comments and suggestions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brown, S., Hall, C.A.S., Knabe, W., Raich, J., Trexler, M.C., & Woomer, P.L. (1993). Tropical forests: Their past, present, and potential future role in the terrestrial carbon budget, in terrestrial biospheric carbon fluxes. In J. Wisniewski, R.N. Sampson (Eds.), Quantification of sinks and sources of CO 2 . (pp.71–94) Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic.
Caspersen, J.P., Pacala, S.W., Jenkins, J.C., Hurtt, G.C., Moorcroft, P.R., & Birdsey, R.A. (2000). Contribution of land-use history to carbon accumulation in U.S. forests. Science, 290, 1148–1151.
Chomitz, K.M. (2000). Evaluating carbon offsets from forestry and energy projects: How do they compare? World Bank, Development Research Group (2000), Washington, DC. Retrieved June, 2003, from http://econ.worldbank.org.
Coward, H., & Weaver, A. (2003). Climate change in Canada. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Field, B., & Olewiler, N. (2002). Environmental economics (2nd Canadian ed.). Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Griss, P. (2002). Forest carbon management in Canada. Final Report of the Pollution Probe Forest Carbon Management Workshop Series, Pollution Probe, Canmore, AB.
Houghton, R.A. (1993). The role of the world’s forests in global warming. In K. Ramakrishna, G.M. Woodwell (Eds.), The World’s Forests for the Future: Their Use and Conservation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
IPCC (2000a). Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry. New York: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC (2000b). The Marrakesh Accords and the Marrakesh Declaration. Marrakesh, Morocco: COP7, IPCC. (Available online at: http://unfccc.int/cop7/documents/accords_draft.pdf).
Krcmar, E., Stennes, B., van Kooten, G.C., & Vertinsky, I. (2001) Carbon sequestration and land management under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 135, 616–629.
Krcmar, E., & van Kooten, G.C. (2003). Timber, carbon uptake and biodiversity tradeoffs in forest management: A compromise programming approach. FEPA Working Paper. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia.
Manley, J., van Kooten, G.C., & Smolak, T.M. (2004). How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of forest carbon sinks. REPA Working Paper. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria.
Marland, G., Fruit, K., & Sedjo, R. (2001). Accounting for sequestered carbon: The question of permanence. Environmental Science & Policy, 4(6), 259–268.
Obersteiner, M., Rametsteiner, E., & Nilsson, S. (2001). Cap Management for LULUCF Options. IIASA Interim Report Ir-01-011. Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA.
Papadopol, C.S. (2000). Impacts of climate warming on forests in Ontario: Options for adaptation and mitigation. The Forestry Chronicle, 76(1), 139–149.
Paustian, K., Andren, O., Janzen, H.H., Lal, R., Smith, P., Tian, G., Thiessen, H., van Noordwijk, M., & Woomer, P.L. (1997). Agricultural soils as a sink to mitigate CO2 emissions. Soil Use and Management, 13, 203–244.
Richards, K.R. (1997). The time value of carbon in bottom-up studies. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 27, S279–S292.
Richards, K.R., & Stokes, C. (2004). A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: A dozen years of research. Climatic Change (in press).
Sandor, R.L., & Skees, J.R. (1999). Creating a market for carbon emissions opportunities for U.S. farmers. Choices, First Quarter, 13–18.
Shaikh, S.L., Suchánek, P., Sun, L., & van Kooten, G.C. (2003). Does inclusion of landowners’ non-market values lower costs of creating carbon forest sinks? REPA Working Paper (2003-03). Victoria, BC: University of Victoria.
Sohngen, B., & Alig, R. (2000). Mitigation, adaptation and climate change: Results from recent research on U.S. timber markets. Environmental Science & Policy, 3, 235–248.
Suchánek, P. (2001). Farmers’ willingness to plant trees in the Canadian grain belt to mitigate climate change. M.Sc. Thesis. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
van Kooten, G.C. (2000). Economic dynamics of tree planting for carbon uptake on marginal agricultural lands. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48, 51–65.
van Kooten, G.C. (2003). Smoke and mirrors: The Kyoto protocol and beyond. Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politique, 29(4), 397–415.
van Kooten, G.C., & Bulte, E.H. (2000). The economics of nature: Managing biological assets. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
van Kooten, G.C., Thompson, W.A., & Vertinsky, I. (1993). Economics of reforestation in British Columbia when benefits of CO2 reduction are taken into account. In W.L. Adamowicz, W. White, W.E. Phillips (Eds.), Forestry and the Environment: Economic Perspectives (pp.227–247). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
van Kooten, G.C., Sedjo, R.A., & Bulte, E.H. (1999). Tropical deforestation: Issues and policies. In H. Folmer, T. Tietenberg (Eds.), The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics (pp.198–249). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
van Kooten, G.C., Krcmar-Nozic, E., Stennes, B., & van Gorkom, R. (1999). Economics of fossil fuel substitution and wood product sinks when trees are planted to sequester carbon on agricultural lands in Western Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29(11), 1669–1678.
van Kooten, G.C., Stennes, B. Krcmar-Nozic, E., & van Gorkom, R. (2000). Economics of afforestation for carbon sequestration in Western Canada. The Forestry Chronicle, 76(1), 165–172.
van Kooten, G.C., Shaikh, S.L., & Suchánek, P. (2002). Mitigating climate change by planting trees: The transaction costs trap. Land Economics, 78, 559–572.
Wallace, J.M., Christy, J.R., Gaffen, D., Grody, N.C., Hansen, J.E., Parker, D.E., Peterson, T.C., Santer, B.D., Spencer, R.W., Trenberth, K.E., & Wentz, F.J. (2000). Reconciling observations of global temperature change. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Watson, R.T., Zinyowera, M.C., Moss, R.H., & Dokken, D.J. (1996). Climate change 1995: Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: Scientific-technical analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Woomer, P.L., Palm, C.A., Alegre, J., Castilla, C., Cordeiro, D., Hairiah, K., Kotto-Same, J., Moukam, A., Risce, A., Rodrigues, V., & Van Noordwijk, M. (1999). Carbon dynamics in slash-and-burn systems and land use alternatives: Findings of the alternative to slash-and-burn programme. Working Paper. Nairobi, Kenya: Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van Cornelis Kooten, G., Eagle, A.J. (2005). Forest Carbon Sinks: A Temporary and Costly Alternative to Reducing Emissions for Climate Change Mitigation. In: Kant, S., Berry, R.A. (eds) Institutions, Sustainability, and Natural Resources. Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3519-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3519-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3479-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3519-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)