Skip to main content

Sustainable Forestry in a World of Specialization and Trade

  • Chapter
Institutions, Sustainability, and Natural Resources

Part of the book series: Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources ((SENR,volume 2))

Abstract

Since Adam Smith economists have recognize that specialization provides the basis for a modern economy since it promotes increased productivity, lower costs and intra regional and international trade. Industrial forestry seems to have recognized this economic reality and in the past fifty years has been moved from obtaining almost all of its industrial wood from the logging natural forests to the production of over one-third of society’s industrial wood production from a trees cropping regime of planting, growing and harvesting intensively managed forests. However, much of the modern environmental movement is opposed to specialization and stresses the concept of individual forest sustainability for a spectrum of outputs, an approach directly the opposite to that of economic specialization. This paper attempts to reconciled these conflicting approaches by recognizing the substantial differences in the outputs mix generated by different forests, referring to the commonly accepted Brundtland Commission definition of a sustainable system and applying this concept to the multiple outputs of the various forest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barney, G.O. (1982). The global 2000 report to the President. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, C.S. (1997). Preserving nature through intensive plantation management. Forestry Chronicle, 73, 553–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, C.S. (2000). Forestry in the new millennium: Creating a vision that fits. In R.A. Sedjo (Ed.), A vision for the U.S. Forest Service (pp. 83–96). Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowes, M., & Krutilla, J. (1989). The economics of public forestlands. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, M. (1979). Forest in the long sweep of American history. Science, 204(15), 1168–1174.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Faustmann, M. (1849). Calculation of the value which forest land and immature stands possess for forestry. Allgeneine Forst—und Jagd-Zeitung, Vol. 15. Reprinted in the Journal of Forest Economics, 1(1), 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedkiw, J. (2003). The forest management pathway to sustainability. Presented to the XII World Forestry Congress, September 25–29, 2004, Quebec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (1993). The state of the world’s forests. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2000). Forest Resources Assessment. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2001). The state of the world’s forest resources. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. (1994). The new face of forestry: Exploring a discontinuity and the need for a new vision. Pinchot Distinguished Lecture. Milford, PA: Gray Towers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y., & Ruttan, V.W. (1985). Agricultural development: An international perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, W.F., Newman, D.H., & Seldon, B.J. (1992). The economic benefits of forestry research. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, J. M. & Spalding, H. (1989) A Reconnaissance-level inventory of the amount of wilderness remaining in the world. Ambio, 18(4), 222–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, D.G. Jr. (2004, August 29). Demographic ‘Bomb’ May Only Go “Pop!” The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messier, C., Bigue, B., & Bernier, L. (2003). Using fast-growing plantation to promote forest ecosystem protection in Canada. Unasylva, 54(214/215), 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, W.V., & Miller, K.R. (1989). Keeping options alive: The scientific basis for conserving biodiversity. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J.F., & Tucker, R.P. (Eds.) (1988). World deforestation in the twentieth century. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo, R.A. (1983). The comparative economics of plantation forestry: A global assessment. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins Press for Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo, R.A. (1990). Economic wood supply: Choices for Canada’s forest industry. The Forestry Chronicle, 66(1), 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo, R.A. (1991). Toward a worldwide system of tradable forest protection and management obligations. RFF Discussion Paper ENR91-16, August 28, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo, R.A. (2003). Introduction. In R.A. Sedjo (Ed.), Economics of Forestry. Part of the T. Tietenber, W. Morrison (Eds.) series, International library of environmental economics and policy. Trowbridge, Wiltshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited, Cromwell Press,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo, R.A. (2004). “Challenges to Sustainable Forestry: Management and Economics.” 2004, in Forest Futures, Joe Bowersox III and Karen Abeese editors, pp. 68–83, Rowman & Littefield, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo, R.A., & Botkin, D. (1997). Using forest plantations to spare natural forests. Environment, 30(10), 14–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo, R.A., & Lyon, K.S. (1990). The long-term adequacy of the world timber supply. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo, R.A., Goetzl, A., & Moffat, S.O. (1998). Sustainability in temperate forests. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohngen, B., & Mendelsohn, R. (2003). An optimal control model of forest carbon sequestration. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(2), 448–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohngen, B., Mendelsohn R., & Sedjo, R. (1999). Forest management, conservation, and global timber markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.W. (1994). Ecosystem management: A national framework. Washington, D.C.: USDA Forest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1998). World Population Prospects 1998 Revision. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, D., & Ausubel, J. (2000). Restoring the forests. Foreign Affairs, 79(6), 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF, Russian Program Office (2004.) http://www.forest.ru/eng/old-growth/ (accessed September 13, 2004.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sedjo, R.A. (2005). Sustainable Forestry in a World of Specialization and Trade. In: Kant, S., Berry, R.A. (eds) Institutions, Sustainability, and Natural Resources. Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3519-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics