Skip to main content

Can Stock-Specific Sustainability Constraints be Justified?

  • Chapter
Book cover Economics, Sustainability, and Natural Resources

Part of the book series: Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources ((SENR,volume 1))

Abstract

We show that the Suppes-Sen grading principle leads to stock-specific sustainability constraints in a class of resource models, provided that the resource is renewable or utility is derived directly from the resource stock. Decreasing the resource stock is not compatible with Suppes-Sen maximality, unless a smaller stock leads to higher natural growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asheim, G.B., Buchholz, W., & Tungodden, B. (2001). Justifying sustainability. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41, 252–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (1996). An axiomatic approach to sustainable development. Social Choice and Welfare 13, 231–257.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G.M. (1998). Valuing the future: Economic theory and sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G.M. (2001). Optimality or sustainability. Columbia University (paper presented at the EAERE 2001 Conference).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krautkraemer, J.A. (1985). Optimal growth, resource amenities and the preservation of natural environments. Review of Economic Studies, 52, 153–170.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, T. (2005). Intergenerational equity and the forest management problem. Chapter 7 of this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzey, J.C.V., & Toman, M.A. (2002). Progress and problems in the economics of sustainability. In T. Tietenberg, H. Folmer, (Eds.), The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2002/2003. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1966). Some formal models of grading principles. Synthese, 6, 284–306.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Asheim, G.B., Buchholz, W. (2005). Can Stock-Specific Sustainability Constraints be Justified?. In: Kant, S., Berry, R.A. (eds) Economics, Sustainability, and Natural Resources. Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3518-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics