Skip to main content

Evolution of Collective Practices in Design by Integration of New Methods

  • Conference paper
Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering

Abstract

This article explores the problem of the evolution of collective practices in f terms of design and offers the solution of doing this operation by integrating new methods. In order to guarantee the success of the integration of a new method, the process of change is viewed as evolving from being one that is imposed to one that is participatory. An experiment, carried out at Bourjois, a cosmetics company, illustrates this method through the integration of functional analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. V. Chanal, (1995), Le management de ll’innovation de produit industriel: Mise en œuvre dl’une démarche de diagnostic pour améliorer notre compréhension du processus. Thèse de doctorat de ll’Ecole Supérieure des Affaires. Université Pierre Mendès-France de Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Vadcard, (1996), Aide à la programmation de ll’utilisation des outils en conception de produit. Thèse de doctorat de ll’Ecole Nationale Supérieure dl’Arts et Métiers. No 96-33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Chauvet, (1995), Méthode de management: le guide, Les Editions dl’Organisation, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Guillevic, (1991), Distinction between two Types of Competences: Expertise Centred on the Means or the Goal, in Y. Queinnec & al., Designing of Everyone, Taylor & Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Bertrand, (2003), Actes de modéliser et appropriation du changement: leçons tirées dl’une recherche intervention, Actes du 5e congrès International de Génie Industriel, Québec, octobre 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Guillevic, (1992), La psychologie du travail, Paris, Nathan.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Mintzberg, (1989), Le management. Voyage au centre des organisations, Ch.6-14, Les Editions dl’Organisation, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Tushman, D. Nadler, (1986), Organizing for Innovation, California Management Review, Volume XXVIII.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Argyris, D. Schon, (2002), Apprentissage organisationnel. Théorie, méthode, pratique, Ch.1, DeBoeck University, Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Kotter, (1995), Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail, Harvard Business Review, March–April 1995, pp. 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Liu, (1997), Fondement et pratiques de la recherche action. Ll’Harmattan, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Claret, (1995), Proposition dl’une méthode dl’évaluation des processus de changement pilotés par des consultants, Thèse de doctorat de ll’Ecole Centrale de Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Sonntag, D. Oget, (2003), « la compétence collective. Condition théoriques requises et résistance du « facteur humain » », Actes du 5e congrès International de Génie Industriel, Québec, octobre 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Lewin, (1947), Frontiers in group Dynamics II, Human Relations, Vol.1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Combes, C. Verzat, (1999), La question de ll’organisation: le défi de ll’autonomie, Actes du 3e congrès International de Génie Industriel, Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Parise, (1997), Les processus dl’appropriation de ll’outil: Hypothèses sur le rôle du collectif de travail, Thèse de doctorat de ll’Université de Toulouse Le-Mirail. no TR 1015-1997-87.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Kotter, L. Schlesinger, (1979), Choosing strategy for change, Harvard Business Review, March–April 1979, pp.106–114.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Perrin, F., Millet, D., Aoussat, A. (2005). Evolution of Collective Practices in Design by Integration of New Methods. In: Bramley, A., Brissaud, D., Coutellier, D., McMahon, C. (eds) Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3482-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3482-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3481-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3482-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics